Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Zipf's Law and the Evolution of Musical Lyrics: A Comparative Analysis of the 1960s, 1990s and the Present Cover

Zipf's Law and the Evolution of Musical Lyrics: A Comparative Analysis of the 1960s, 1990s and the Present

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Ausloos, M., Nedic, O., Fronczak, A.,&Fronczak, P. (2015). Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf's law. Scientometrics, 106(1), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1508.05624
  2. Boroda, M.G.,&Polikarpov, A.A. (1988). The Zipf-Mandelbrot law and units of different text levels. Musikometrika, 1, 127–158. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cs/0406015
  3. Cepeda, R. (Ed.) (2004). And it don’t stop: the best American hip-hop journalism of the last 25 years. Macmillan. Available at:https://archive.org/details/anditdontstopbes00ceped
  4. Charlton, K. (2003). Rock Music Styles. McGraw-Hill Humanities, Social Sciences & World Languages. Available at: https://archive.org/details/rockmusicstylesh0000char_04ed
  5. Gao, J. (2023). R-Squared – How much variation is explained? Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843231186398
  6. Haro, M., Serrà, J., Herrera, P.,& Corral, Á. (2012). Zipf's Law in Short-Time Timbral Codings of Speech, Music, and Environmental Sound Signals. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e33993–e33993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033993
  7. Lap, Y.C.,& Kao, B. (1999). A study on musical features for melody databases. International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 724–733. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48309-8_67
  8. Lech, M.E., Lehmann, S.,&Juul, J.L. (2024). Is it getting harder to make a hit? Evidence from 65 years of US music chart history. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.07574
  9. Lerdahl, F.,& Jackendoff, R. (1996). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, Mass.: Mit Press. Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S.,& Chen, L. (2002). The Importance of the Normality Assumption in Large
  10. Public Health Data Sets. Annual Review of Public Health, 23(1), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546
  11. Macdonald, I. (2008). Revolution in the head: the Beatles’ records and the sixties. London: Random House.
  12. Manaris, B., Vaughan, D., Wagner, C.C., Antonio, J.,& Davis, R.H. (2003). Evolutionary Music and the Zipf-
  13. Mandelbrot Law: Developing Fitness Functions for Pleasant Music. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36605-9_48
  14. Mandelbrot, B.B. (1977). The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman and Company.
  15. Martinson, K.,& P. Zieliński (2019). Statistical Properties of Tonal and Atonal Pieces of Music. Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement, 13(4), p.815. https://doi.org/10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.13.823
  16. Mathews, A. (2024). The Future of Music is in AI; Thanks To Spotify. [online] AIM Research | Artificial Intelligence Market Insights. Available at: https://aimresearch.co/market-industry/the-future-of-musicis-in-ai-thanks-to-spotify
  17. Patel, A.D. (2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 674–681.
  18. Perotti, J.I.,&Billoni, O.V. (2020). On the emergence of Zipf's law in music. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 549, 124309.
  19. Reed, W.J. (2001). The Pareto, Zipf and other power laws. Economics Letters, 74(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(01)00524-9
  20. Reynolds, S. (2011). Retromania: Pop culture's addiction to its own past. Macmillan. Available at: https://archive.org/details/retromaniapopcul0000reyn
  21. Voss, R.F.,& Clarke, C.J. (1975). 1/f noise in music and speech. Nature, 258, 317–318.
  22. Wald, E. (2011). How the Beatles destroyed rock ‘n’ roll: an alternative history of American popular music. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Zanette, D.H. (2006). Zipf's law and the creation of musical context. Musicae Scientiae, 10(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/102986490601000101
  24. Zanette, D.H. (2008). Music, Complexity, Information. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.0807.0565
  25. Zipf, G.K. (1929). Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 40, 1–95. Available at: https://scispace.com/pdf/relative-frequency-as-a-determinant-of-phonetic-change-1isfubt996.pdf
  26. Zipf, G.K. (1932). Selected studies of the principle of relative frequency in language. Harvard University Press. Available at:https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2407800_3/component/file_2459540/content
  27. Zipf, G.K. (1935). The Psycho-Biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Houghton Mifflin Company. Available at: https://iqla.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Zipf_1935_1965_Psycho-Biology_Language.pdf
  28. Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Addison-Wesley Press. Available at: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.90211/page/n7/mode/2up
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 130
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Camelia-Maria Dan, Cristina-Rodica Boboc, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.