Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Predicting Days to Respondent Contact in Cross-Sectional Surveys Using a Bayesian Approach Cover

Predicting Days to Respondent Contact in Cross-Sectional Surveys Using a Bayesian Approach

Journal of Official Statistics
Volume 39 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)
By: Stephanie Coffey and  Michael R. Elliott  
Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. Bates, N., J. Dahlhamer, P. Phipps, A, Safir, and L. Tan. 2010. “Assessing Contact History Paradata Quality Across Several Federal Surveys,” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association 2010 Joint Statistical Meeting, Vancouver, Canada. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/v2010f.html (accessed July 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Biemer, P., P. Chen, and K. Wang. 2013. “Using Level-Of-Effort Paradata in Non-Response Adjustments with Application to Field Surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A176: 147–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01058.x.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Biffignandi, S., and J. Bethlehem. 2021. Web Surveys and Other Modes of Data Collection. In Handbook of Web Surveys. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119371717.ch6.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Calinescu, M., S. Bhulai, and B. Schouten. 2013. “Optimal Resource Allocation in Survey Designs,” European Journal of Operations Research 226: 115–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Census Bureau. 2008. A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2008/acs/ACSGeneralHandbook.pdf (accessed October 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Census Bureau. 2016. Planning Database Documentation. Available at: https://www.census.gov/research/data/planning_database/2016/docs/PDB_Block_Group_2016-07-28a.pdf (accessed July 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Chesnut, J. 2013. “Model-based mode of data collection: switching from internet to mail in the American Communities Survey.” 2013 American Communities Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memo Series #ACS-13RER, 18, 1–17. Available at: https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2013/acs/2013_Chesnut_01.html (accessed July 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Christy, J. 2014. “Use of Response Propensity Scores to Direct CAPI Field Activity.” In Proceedings of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, May 15–18, Anaheim, CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01058.x.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Coffey, S., B. Reist, and P.V. Miller. 2019. “Interventions On-Call: Dynamic Adaptive Design in the 2015 National Survey of College Graduates,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8: 726–747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz026.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Couper, M.P. 2000. “Usability Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Survey Instruments,” Social Science Computer Review 18: 384–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930061800402.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Couper, M.P. 2017. “Birth and Diffusion of the Concept of Paradata” Advances in Social Research 18: 14–26. Available at: https://jasr.or.jp/english/JASR_Birth%20and%20-Diffusion%20of%20the%20Concept%20of%20Paradata.pdf (accessed October 2020).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Durrant, G.B., and F. Steele. 2009. “Multilevel Modelling of Refusal and Non-Contact in Household Surveys: Evidence from Six UK Government Surveys,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A172: 361–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00565.x.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Edwards, B., H. Sun, and R. Hubbard. 2020. “Behavior change techniques for reducing interviewer contributions to total survey error.” In Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective: 77–90. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Feng, C.X. 2021. “A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data,” Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications 8: 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40488-021-00121-4.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Groves, R.M., and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys, New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Groves, R.M., and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Designing for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A169: 439–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Hobbs, B.P., B.P. Carlin, S.J. Mandrekar, and D.J. Sargent. 2011. “Hierarchical commensurate and power prior models for adaptive incorporation of historical information in clinical trials.” Biometrics 67: 1047–1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01564.x.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Ibrahim, J.G., and M.H. Chen. 2000. “Power prior distributions for regression models.” Statistical Science 15: 46–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009212673.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Jackson, M.T., C.B. McPhee, and P.J. Lavrakas. 2020. “Using Response Propensity Modeling to Allocate Noncontingent Incentives in an Address-Based Sample: Evidence from a National Experiment,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8: 385–411, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz007.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Laflamme, F., and M. Karaganis. 2010. “Implementation of Responsive Collection Design for CATI Surveys at Statistics Canada.” In Proceedings of the Q2010, 3–6 May, Helsinki, Finland. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Francois-Laflamme-3/publication/228583181_Implementation_of_Responsive_Collection_Design_for_CATI_Surveys_at_Statistics_Canada/links/5436b2120cf2dc341db46d70/Implementationof-Responsive-Collection-Design-for-CATI-Surveys-at-Statistics-Canada.pdf (accessed July 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Luiten, A., J. Hox, and E. de Leeuw. 2020. “Survey Nonresponse Trends and Fieldwork Effort in the 21st Century: Results of an International Study across Countries and Surveys,” Journal of Official Statistics 36(3): 469–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/-JOS-2020-0025.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Ma, L., M. Yan, and J. Weng. 2015. “Modeling Traffic Crash Rates of Road Segments through a Lognormal Hurdle Framework with Flexible Scale Parameter,” Journal of Advanced Transportation 49: 928–940.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Mittereder, F., and B.T. West. 2021. “A Dynamic Survival Modeling Apporach to the Prediction of Web Survey Breakoff.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 10: 945–978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Mneimneh, Z., L. Lyberg, S. Sharma, M. Vyas, D.B. Sathe, F. Malter, and Y. Altwaijri. 2018. “Case Studies on Monitoring Interviewer Behavior in International and Multinational Surveys.” In Advances in Comparative Survey Methods. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884997.ch35.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Mullahy, J. 1986. “Specification and Testing of some Modified Count Data Models,” Journal of Econometrics 33: 341–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90002-3.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics. 2018. National Health Interview Survey: Survey Description. Technical Report. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHIS/2017/srvydesc.pdf (accessed July 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Peytchev, A., J. Rosen, S. Riley, J. Murphy, and M. Lindblad. 2010. “Reduction of Nonresponse Bias through Case Prioritization.” Survey Research Methods 4: 21–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.3037.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Peytchev A. 2014. Models and Interventions in adaptive and responsive survey designs. DC-AAPOR Panel on Adaptive Survey Design. Washington D.C. Available at: http://dc-aapor.org/ModelsInterventionsPeytchev.pdf (accessed July 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Peytchev, A., D. Pratt, and M. Duprey. 2020. “Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design: Use of Bias Propensity During Data Collection to Reduce Nonresponse Bias,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 10: 131–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smaa013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Roberts, C., C. Vandenplas, and M.E. Stahli. 2014. “Evaluating the Impact of Response Enhancement Methods on the Risk of Nonresponse Bias and Survey Costs.” Survey Research Methods 8: 67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2014.v8i2.5459.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Rose, C., S. Martin, K. Wannemuehler, and B. Plikaytis. 2006. “On the Use of Zero-Inflated and Hurdle Models for Modeling Vaccine Adverse Event Count Data,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 16: 463–481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400600719384.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 39: 29–58. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2009001/article/10887-eng.pdf?st=Ox4bRwqM.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response,” Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 231–253. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/indicators-for-monitoring-and-improving-representativeness-of-response.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Schouten, B., N. Mushkudiani, N. Shlomo, G. Durrant, P. Lundquist, and J. Wagner. 2018. “A Bayesian Analysis of Design Parameters in Survey Data Collection,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 6: 431–464: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smy012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Smithson, M., and E. Merkle. 2013. “Chapter 5: Count Variables,” In Generalized Linear Models for Categorical and Continuous Limited Dependent Variables. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. Print.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Sun, J. 2006. The Statistical Analysis of Interval-Censored Failure Time Data New York: Springer.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Tolliver, K., J. Fields, S. Coffey, and A. Nagle. 2019. “Combating Attrition Bias Using Case Prioritization in the Survey of Income and Program Participation.” In Proceedings from the 2019 AAPOR Conference, Toronto, Ontario, USA. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2019/files/1199523.pdf (accessed July 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Wagner, J., and T.E. Raghunathan. 2010. “A New Stopping Rule for Surveys.” Statistics in Medicine 29: 1014–1024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3834.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Wagner, J., and F. Hubbard. 2014. “Producing Unbiased Estimates of Propensity Models during Data Collection,” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2: 323–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smu009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Wagner, J., B.T. West, N. Kirgis, J.M. Lepkowski, W.G. Axinn, and S.K. Ndiaye. 2012. “Use of Paradata in a Responsive Design Framework to Manage a Field Data Collection.” Journal of Official Statistics 28: 477–499. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/f6bcee6f397c4fd68db6452fc9643e68/use-of-paradata-in-a-responsive-design-framework-to-manage-a-field-data-collection.pdf (accessed July 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Walejko, G., and J. Wagner. 2018. “A Study of Interviewer Compliance in 2013 and 2014 Census Test Adaptive Designs” Journal of Official Statistics 34(3): 649–670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0031.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Walsh, R., and J. Coombs. 2013. “Case Reassignment: When making contact is a two-person job.” In Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Boston, MA, USA: 3690–3700. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296847275_Case_Reassignment_When_making_contact_is_a_two-person_job (accessed July 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. West, B.T., and R.M. Groves. 2013. “The PAIP Score: A Propensity-Adjusted Interviewer Performance Indicator,” Public Opinion Quarterly 77: 352–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. West, B.T., and F. Kreuter. 2013. “Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Interviewer Observations: Evidence from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG).” Public Opinion Quarterly 77: 522–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. West, B.T., J. Wagner, S. Coffey, and M.R. Elliott. 2021. “Deriving Priors for Bayesian Prediction of Daily Response Propensity in Responsive Survey Design: Historical Data Analysis vs. Literature Review.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 11: 367–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab036.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Williams, D., and J.M. Brick. 2018. “Trends in U.S Face-to-Face Household Survey Nonresponse and Level of Effort.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 6: 186–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2023-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7367
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 325 - 349
Submitted on: Apr 1, 2022
|
Accepted on: Jan 1, 2023
|
Published on: Sep 7, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Adaptive design,
hurdle models,
national health interview survey
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics

© 2023 Stephanie Coffey, Michael R. Elliott, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 39 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)Next article