Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Trends in Establishment Survey Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from the 2001-2017 IAB Establishment Panel Cover

Trends in Establishment Survey Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from the 2001-2017 IAB Establishment Panel

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion research). 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. AAPOR.
  2. Bavdaz, M., D. Giesen, D.L. Moore, P.A. Smith, and J. Jones. 2019. “Qualitative Testing for Official Establishment Survey Questionnaires”. Survey Research Methods 13(3): 267–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v13i3.7366.
  3. Beckler, D.G., and K. Ott. 2006. “Indirect Monetary Incentives with a Complex Agricultural Establishment Survey”. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methodology Section, 2741–2748. Alexandria, VA, USA. American Statistical Association. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.511.9782&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed November 2021).
  4. Beullens, K., G. Loosveldt, C. Vandenplas, and I. Stoop. 2018. “Response Rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field: 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2018-00003.
  5. Brick, J.M., and R. Tourangeau. 2017. “Responsive Survey Designs for Reducing Nonresponse Bias.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(3): 735–752. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2017-0034.10.1515/jos-2017-0034
  6. Brick, J.M., and D. Williams. 2013. “Explaining Rising Nonresponse Rates in Cross-sectional Surveys.” In The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 36–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212456834.10.1177/0002716212456834
  7. Brixy, U., S. Kohaut, and C. Schnabel. 2007. “Do Newly Founded Firms Pay Lower Wages? First Evidence from Germany.” Small Business Economics 29(1-2): 161–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0015-x.10.1007/s11187-006-0015-x
  8. Christianson, A., and R.D. Tortora. 1995. “Issues in Surveying Businesses: An International Survey.” In Business Survey Methods, 235–256. New York: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118150504.ch14.10.1002/9781118150504.ch14
  9. D’Aurizio, L., and G. Papadia. 2019. “Using Administrative Data to Evaluate Sampling Bias in a Business Panel Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 35(1): 67–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0004.10.2478/jos-2019-0004
  10. Davis, W.R., and N. Pihama. 2009. “Survey Response as Organisational Behaviour: An Analysis of the Annual Enterprise Survey 2003-2007.” New Zealand Association of Economists Conference 2009: 1–16. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zeland Association of Economists. Available at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/eispapers/826/ (accessed November 2021).
  11. De Leeuw, E., and W. de Heer. 2002. “Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 41–54. New York: Wiley.
  12. Dillman, D.A., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781394260645
  13. Earp, M., D. Toth, P. Phipps, and C. Oslund. 2018. “Assessing Nonresponse in a Longitudinal Establishment Survey Using Regression Trees.” Journal of Official Statistics 34(2): 463–481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0021.10.2478/jos-2018-0021
  14. Ellguth, P., S. Kohaut, and I. Möller. 2013. “The IAB Establishment Panel – Methodological Essentials and Data Quality.” Journal for Labour Market Research 47: 27–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-013-0151-0.10.1007/s12651-013-0151-0
  15. Ellguth, P., and S. Kohaut. 2019. “A Note on the Decline of Collective Bargaining Coverage: The Role of Structural Change.” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 239(1): 39–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2017-0163.10.1515/jbnst-2017-0163
  16. Eurofound. 2015. Third European Company Survey – Overview Report: Workplace Practices – Patterns, Performance and Well-Being. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1502en_0.pdf (accessed November 2021).
  17. Fischer, G., F. Janik, D. Müller, and A. Schmucker. 2008. “The IAB Establishment Panel – from Sample to Survey to Projection.” FDZ Methodenreport 01/2008: Nuremberg. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/reader/6561380 (accessed November 2021).
  18. Fisher, S., J. Bosley, K. Goldenberg, W. Mockovak, and C. Tucker. 2003. “A Qualitative Study of Nonresponse Factors Affecting BLS Establishment Surveys: Results.” Presented at the Annual Joint Statistical Meetings, San Francisco, CA. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2003/pdf/st030230.pdf (accessed November 1st 2021).
  19. Groves, R.M. 2006. “Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 646–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033.10.1093/poq/nfl033
  20. Groves, R.M., and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118490082
  21. Groves, R.M., and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 167–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011.10.1093/poq/nfn011
  22. Henze, p. 2014. “Structural Change and Wage Inequality: Evidence from German Micro Data.” Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Working Paper 204. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2422471.10.2139/ssrn.2422471
  23. Janik, F. 2011. “Unit Non-response in Establishments Surveyed for the First Time in the IAB Establishment Panel.” FDZ Methodenreport 04/2011: Nuremberg. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228956272_Unit_non-response_in_establishments_surveyed_for_the_first_time_in_the_IAB_Establishment_Panel (accessed November 2021).
  24. Janik, F., and S. Kohaut. 2012 “Why Don’t They Answer? Unit Non-response in the IAB Establishment Panel.” Quality & Quantity 46: 917–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9436-y.10.1007/s11135-011-9436-y
  25. Jobber, D., H. Mirza, and K.H. Wee. 1991. “Incentives and Response Rates to Cross-national Business Surveys: A Logit Model Analysis.” Journal of International Business Studies 22: 711–721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490852.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490852
  26. Kohler, U., and F. Kreuter. 2012. Datenanalyse mit Stata: Allgemeine Konzepte der Datenanalyse und ihre praktische Anwendung. München: Oldenbourg.
  27. Luiten, A., J Hox, and E. de Leeuw. 2020. “Survey Nonresponse Trends and Fieldwork Effort in the 21st Century: Results of an International Study across Countries and Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 36(3): 469–487. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/JOS-2020-0025.10.2478/jos-2020-0025
  28. Luo, A., and G.D. White. 2005. “Exploring a New Establishment Survey Incentive to Improve Response Rates.” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methodology Section, May 12-15, 2005. 3915–3918. Miami Beach, Florida. American Statistical Association. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.528.9845&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed November 2021).
  29. Mullins, J.P. 2016. “One Hundred Years of Current Employment Statistics – an Overview of Survey Advancements.” Monthly Labor Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2016.39.10.21916/mlr.2016.39
  30. Paxson, M.C., D.A. Dillman, and J. Tarnai. 1995. “Improving Response to Business Mail Surveys.” In Business Survey Methods, edited by B.G. Cox, D.A. Binder, B.N. Chinnappa, A. Christianson, M.J. Colledge, and P.S. Kott, 303-316. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781118150504.ch17
  31. Petroni, R., R. Sigman, D. Willimack, S. Cohen, and C. Tucker. 2004 “Response Rates and Nonresponse in Establishment Surveys–BLS and Census Bureau.” Presented to the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee, 1–50. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.485.5983&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed November 2021).
  32. Phipps, P., and D. Toth. 2012. “Analyzing Establishment Nonresponse Using an Interpretable Regression Tree Model with Linked Administrative Data.” The Annals of Applied Statistics 6(2): 772–794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/11-AOAS521.10.1214/11-AOAS521
  33. Sakshaug, J.W., and M. Huber. 2016. “An Evaluation of Panel Nonresponse and Linkage Consent Bias in a Survey of Employees in Germany.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 4(1): 71–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smv034.10.1093/jssam/smv034
  34. Sakshaug, J.W., S. Hülle, A. Schmucker, and S. Liebig. 2019a. “Panel Survey Recruitment With or Without Interviewers? – Implications for Nonresponse Bias, Panel Consent Bias, and Total Recruitment Bias.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8(3): 540–565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz012.10.1093/jssam/smz012
  35. Sakshaug, J.W., B. Vicari, and M.P. Couper. 2019b. “Paper, E-mail, or Both? Effects of Contact Mode on Participation in a Web Survey of Establishments.” Social Science Computer Review 37(6): 750–765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318805160.10.1177/0894439318805160
  36. Schmucker, A., A. Ganzer, J. Stegmaier, and S. Wolter. 2018. “Establishment History Panel 1975-2017.” FDZ Datenreport 09/2018: Nuremberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5164/IAB.FDZD.1809.en.v1.
  37. Seiler, C. 2010. “Dynamic Modelling of Nonresponse in Business Surveys.” Ifo Working Paper No. 93. Munich: ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/73706/1/IfoWorkingPaper-93.pdf (accessed November 2021).
  38. StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
  39. Sudman, S., D.K. Willimack, E. Nichols, and T.L. Mesenbourg. 2000. “Exploratory Research at the U.S. Census Bureau on the Survey Response Process in Large Companies.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 17-21, 2000: 327–337. Buffalo, New York. American Statistical Association.
  40. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., J. Leiter, and S. Thompson. 1995. “Item Nonresponse in Organizational Surveys.” Sociological Methodology 25: 77–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/271062.10.2307/271062
  41. Wagner, J. 2012. “Average Wage, Qualification of the Workforce and Export Performance in German Enterprises: Evidence from KombiFiD Data.” Journal for Labour Market Research 45: 161–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-012-0106-x.10.1007/s12651-012-0106-x
  42. Willimack, D.K., E. Nichols, and S. Sudman. 2002. “Understanding Unit and Item Nonresponse in Business Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 213–227. New York: Wiley.
  43. Willimack, D.K., and E. Nichols. 2010. “A Hybrid Response Process Model for Business Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 26 (1): 3–24. Available at: https://www.scb.se/-contentassets/f6bcee6f397c4fd68db6452fc9643e68/a-hybrid-response-process-model-for-business-surveys.pdf%20 (accessed November 2021).
  44. Willimack, D.K., and G. Snijkers. 2013. “The Business Context and Its Implications for the Survey Response Process.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 39–82. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118447895.ch02
Language: English
Page range: 931 - 953
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2020
|
Accepted on: Mar 1, 2021
|
Published on: Dec 26, 2021
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Corinna König, Joseph W. Sakshaug, Jens Stegmaier, Susanne Kohaut, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.