References
- Austin, P.C., and D.S. Small. 2014. “The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study.” Statistics in Medicine 33(24) : 4306–4319. Wiley Online Library. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6276.10.1002/sim.6276426011525087884
- Ballabio, S., A. Carra, S. Casacci, D. Ferrazza, F. Verrecchia, A. Vitalini, and L.C. Viviano. 2018. “Local decisions and new guidelines of the Official Statistics.” In Proceedings of Q2018 European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, June 2018, Cracovia, Poland.
- Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of nonresponse in household surveys. Wiley Series in Survey Methodology. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470891056.10.1002/9780470891056
- Buelens, B., and J.A. van den Brakel. 2014. “Measurement error calibration in mixed-mode Sample Surveys.” Sociological methods and Research 44(3) : 391–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114532444.10.1177/0049124114532444
- Buelens, B., J.A. van den Brakel, and B. Schouten. 2018. “Current methodologies to deal with mode effects and mode bias in multi-mode designs.” MIMOD Deliverable 1 – WP2. Available at: https://www.istat.it/en/research-activity/international-research-activity/essnet-and-grants (accessed May 2021).
- De Leeuw, E.D. 2005. “To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 21(2) : 233–255. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/-ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/to-mix-or-not-to-mix-data-collection-modes-in-surveys.pdf (accessed May 2021).
- Efron, B. 1979. “Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife.” The Annals of Statistics 7(1) : 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344552.10.1214/aos/1176344552
- Efron, B., and R. Tibshirani. 1986. “Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy.” Statistical Science 1(1) : 54–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013815.10.1214/ss/1177013815
- Eurostat. 2014. ESS Guidelines for the Implementation of the ESS Quality and Performance Indicators (QPI). Luxembourg ESTAT / D4/LA D (2014). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/64157/4373903/02-ESS-Quality-and-performance-Indicators-2014.pdf/5c996003-b770-4a7c-9c2f-bf733e6b1f31 (accessed May 2021).
- Garofalo, G. 2014. “Il Progetto ARCHIMEDE obiettivi e risultati sperimentali.” Istat Working Paper. Available at: https://www.istat.it/it/files/2014/11/IWP-n.-9-2014.pdf (accessed February 2015).
- Hox, J., E.D. de Leeuw, and T. Klausch. 2015. “Mixed Mode Research: Issues in Design and Analysis.” In Total Survey Error in Practice, edited by P.P. Biemer et al.: 511–530. New York: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119041702.ch23.10.1002/9781119041702.ch23
- ISTAT (2019). “Aspetti metodologici dellindagine. Aspetti della vita quotidiana Periodo di riferimento: anno 2017”. Rome: ISTAT. Available at: https://www.istat.it/microdata/download.php?id=/import/fs/pub/wwwarmida/60/2017/01/Nota.pdf (accessed May 2021).
- Martin, P., and P. Lynn. 2011. “The effects of mixed mode survey designs on simple and complex analyses.” ISER Working Paper Series 2011–28. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/iserwp/2011-28.html (accessed May 2021).
- Rosenbaum, P.R., and D.B. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70: 41–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
- Rust, K.F., and J.N.K. Rao. 1996. “Variance estimation for complex surveys using replication techniques.” In Statistical methods in medical research 5(3) : 283–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F096228029600500305.10.1177/0962280296005003058931197
- Schouten, B.F., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the representativeness of survey response.” In Survey Methodology 35(1) : 101–113. Available at: Indicators for the representativeness of survey response (statcan.gc.ca).
- Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativity of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 231–253. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/indicators-for-monitoring-and-improving-representativeness-of-response.pdf (accessed May 2021).
- Tourangeau, R., and T. Yan. 2007. “Sensitive questions in surveys.” Psychological Bulletin 133(5) : 859–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.85917723033
- Vandenplas, C., G. Loosveldt, and J.T.A. Vannieuwenhuyze. 2016. “Assessing the use of mode preference as a covariate for the estimation of measurement effects between modes. A sequential mixed mode experiment.” Methods, data, analyses (mda) 10(2) : 119–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2016.011.
- Vannieuwenhuyze, J.T A., G. Loosveldt, and G. Molenberghs. 2010. “A Method for Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-mode Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5) : 1027–1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq059.10.1093/poq/nfq059
- Wolter, K.M. 2007. Introduction to variance estimation. Statistical for Social and Behavioral Science. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.