Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Representativeness of Online Time Use Surveys. Effects of Individual Time Use Patterns and Survey Design on the Timing of Survey Dropout Cover

The Representativeness of Online Time Use Surveys. Effects of Individual Time Use Patterns and Survey Design on the Timing of Survey Dropout

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Abraham, K.G., A. Maitland, and S.M. Bianchi. 2006. “Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey: Who Is Missing from the Data and How Much Does It Matter?” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 676–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl037.10.1093/poq/nfl037
  2. Bethlehem, J. 2009. “The Rise of Survey Sampling.” Statistics Netherlands. Discussion Paper (09015). Available at: https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/imported/documents/2009/07/2009-15-x10-pub.pdf?la=nl-nl&hash=B75A64DF0877B7FD089E796FCFE81145 (accessed August 2020).
  3. Boström, G., J. Hallqvist, B.J.A. Haglund, A. Romelsjö, L. Svanström, and F. Diderichsen. 1993. “Socioeconomic Differences in Smoking in an Urban Swedish Population. The Bias Introduced by Non-Participation in a Mailed Questionnaire.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 21(2): 77–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/140349489302100204.10.1177/140349489302100204
  4. Connelly, N.A., T.L. Brown, and D.J. Decker. 2003. “Factors Affecting Response Rates to Natural Resource – Focused Mail Surveys: Empirical Evidence of Declining Rates Over Time.” Society & Natural Resources 16(6): 541–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309152.10.1080/08941920309152
  5. Couper, M.P., A. Kapteyn, M. Schonlau, and J. Winter. 2007. “Noncoverage and Nonresponse in an Internet Survey.” Social Science Research 36(1): 131–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.10.002.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.10.002
  6. Cull, W.L., K.G.O. Connor, S. Sharp, and S.S. Tang. 2005. “Methods Response Rates and Response Bias for 50 Surveys of Pediatricians.” HSR: Health Services Research 40(1): 213–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00350.x.10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00350.x
  7. Curtin, R., S. Presser, and E. Singer. 2000. “The Effects of Response Rate Changes on the Index of Consumer Sentiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(4): 413–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/318638.10.1086/318638
  8. Dillman, D.A., G. Phelps, R. Tortora, K. Swift, J. Kohrell, J. Berck, and B.L. Messer. 2009. “Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet.” Social Science Research, 38(1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007
  9. Etter, J.-F., and T.V. Perneger. 1997. “Analysis of Non-Response Bias in a Mailed Health Survey.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50(10): 1123–1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00166-2.10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00166-2
  10. Goyder, J. 1986. “Surveys on Surveys: Limitations and Potentialities.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50(1): 27–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/268957.10.1086/268957
  11. Goyder, J., K. Warriner, and S. Miller. 2002. “Evaluating Socio-Economic Status (SES) Bias in Survey Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 18(1): 1–11. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/evaluating-socio-economic-status-ses-bias-in-survey-nonresponse.pdf (accessed September 2020).
  12. Groves, R.M., and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York (NY): John Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.3.699.10.1525/aa.1999.101.3.699
  13. Hill, A., J. Roberts, P. Ewings, and D. Gunnell. 1997. “Non-Response Bias in a Lifestyle Survey.” Journal of Public Health 19(2): 203–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024610.10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a0246109243437
  14. Hochschild, A., and A. Machung. 2003. The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. New York (NY): Penguin.
  15. Johnson, T.P., and J.S. Wislar. 2012. “Response Rates and Nonresponse Errors in Surveys.” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 307(17): 1805–1806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.3532.10.1001/jama.2012.353222550194
  16. Knulst, W., and A. van den Broek. 1998. “Do Time-Use Surveys Succeed in Measuring ‘Busyness’? Some Observations of the Dutch Case.” Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure 21(2): 563–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.1998.10753671.10.1080/07053436.1998.10753671
  17. Kwak, N., and B. Radler. 2002. “A Comparison Between Mail and Web Surveys: Response Pattern, Respondent Profile, and Data Quality.” Journal of Official Statistics 18(2): 257–273. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/a-comparison-between-mail-and-web-surveys-response-pattern-respondent-profile-and-data-quality.pdf (accessed September 2020).
  18. Marcus, B., M. Bosnjak, S. Lindner, S. Pilischenko, and A. Schutz. 2007. “Compensating for Low Topic Interest and Long Surveys: A Field Experiment on Nonresponse in Web Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review 25(3): 372–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307297606.10.1177/0894439307297606
  19. Minnen, J., I. Glorieux, T.P. van Tienoven, D. Weenas, J. Deyaert, S. van den Bogaert, and S. Rymenants. 2014. “Modular Online Time Use Survey (MOTUS) – Translating an existing method in the 21st century.” Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 11(1), 73–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13085/eIJTUR.11.1.73-93.10.13085/eIJTUR.11.1.73-93
  20. Moore, D.L., and J. Tarnai. 2001. “Evaluating Nonresponse Error in Mail Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 197–212. New York (NY): Wiley.
  21. Pääkkönen, H. 1998. “Are Busy People Under- or over-Represented in National Time Budget Surveys?” Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure 21(2): 573–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.1998.10753672.10.1080/07053436.1998.10753672
  22. Porter, S.R., and M.E. Whitcomb. 2005. “Non-Response in Student Surveys: The Role of Demographics, Engagement and Personality.” Research in Higher Education 46(2): 127–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1597-2.10.1007/s11162-004-1597-2
  23. Savage, M., and R. Burrows. 2009. “Some Further Reflections on the Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.” Sociology 43(4): 762–772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509105420.10.1177/0038038509105420
  24. Sax, L.J., S.K. Gilmartin, and A.N. Bryant. 2003. “Assessing Response Rate and Nonreponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys.” Research in Higher Education 44(4): 409–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024232915870.10.1023/A:1024232915870
  25. Singer, E., R.M. Groves, and A.D. Corning. 1999. “Differential Incentives: Beliefs About Practices, Perceptions of Equity, and Effects on Survey Participation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63(2): 251–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/297714.10.1086/297714
  26. Singer, E., J. van Hoewyk, and M.P. Maher. 2000. “Experiments with Incentives in Telephone Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(2): 171–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/317761.10.1086/31776110984332
  27. Singer, J.D., and J.B. Willett. 2003. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis. Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001
  28. Smith, C., and D. Nutbeam. 1990. “Assessing Non-Response Bias: A Case Study from the 1985 Welsh Heart Health Survey.” Health Education Research 5(3): 381–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/5.3.381.10.1093/her/5.3.381
  29. Smith, W.G. 2008. “Does Gender Influence Online Survey Participation? A Record-Linkage Analysis of University Faculty Online Survey Response Behavior.” Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501717.pdf (accessed August 2020).
  30. Szalai, A. 1966. “Trends in Comparative Time-Budget Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 9(9): 3–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426600900901.10.1177/000276426600900901
  31. Van Ingen, E., I. Stoop, and K. Breedveld. 2008. “Nonresponse in the Dutch Time Use Survey: Strategies for Response Enhancement and Bias Reduction.” Field Methods 21(1): 69–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08323099.10.1177/1525822X08323099
  32. Van Kenhove, P., K. Wijnen, and K. de Wulf. 2000. “The Influence of Topic Involvement on Mail-Survey Response Behavior.” Psychology & Marketing 19(3): 293–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1053.10.1002/mar.1053
  33. Wallace, D. 1954. “A Case For- and Against- Mail Questionnaires.” Public Opinion Quarterly 18(1): 40–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266484.10.1086/266484
  34. Zuzanek, J. 1998. “Non-Response in Time-Use Surveys: Do the Two Ends Meet?” Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure 21(2): 547–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.1998.10753668.10.1080/07053436.1998.10753668
Language: English
Page range: 887 - 906
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2019
|
Accepted on: Aug 1, 2020
|
Published on: Dec 10, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Petrus te Braak, Joeri Minnen, Ignace Glorieux, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.