Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Action Structure of Recruitment Calls and Its Analytic Implications: The Case of Disfluencies

Journal of Official Statistics
Volume 36 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Arnold, J.E., C.L.H. Kam, and M.K. Tanenhaus. 2007. “If You Say Thee uh You Are Describing Something Hard: The On-Line Attribution of Disfluency During Reference Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(5): 914–930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914.10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.914
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Arnold, J.E., M.K. Tanenhaus, R.J. Altmann, and M. Fagnano. 2004. “The Old and Thee, uh, New: Disfluency and Reference Resolution.” Psychological Science 15(9): 578–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Barr, D.J. and M. Seyfeddinipur. 2010. “The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency.” Language and Cognitive Processes 25(4): 441–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903047122.10.1080/01690960903047122
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Boomer, D.S. 1965. “Hesitation and Grammatical Encoding.” Language and Speech 8(3): 148–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002383096500800302.10.1177/002383096500800302
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bortfeld, H., S.D. Leon, J.E. Bloom, M.F. Schober, and S.E. Brennan. 2001. “Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender.” Language and Speech 44(2): 123–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00238309010440020101.10.1177/00238309010440020101
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Brennan, S.E. and M.F. Schober. 2001. “How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech.” Journal of Memory and Language 44: 274–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2753.10.1006/jmla.2000.2753
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Chamberlain, G. 1980. “Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data.” The Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 225–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297110.10.2307/2297110
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Christenfeld, N. 1995. “Does it hurt to say um?” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 19(3): 171–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02175503.10.1007/BF02175503
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Clark, H.H. and J.E. Fox Tree. 2002. “Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.” Cognition 84(1): 73–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3.10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Conrad, F.G., J.S. Broome, J.R. Benkí, F. Kreuter, R.M. Groves, D. Vannette, and C. McClain. 2013. “Interviewer speech and the success of survey invitations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176(1): 191–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01064.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01064.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Dijkstra, W. and J. Smit. 2002. “Persuading Reluctant Recipients in Telephone Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.A. Little, 121–134. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Draisma, S. and W. Dijkstra. 2004. “Response Latency and (Para)linguistic Expression as Indicators of Response Error.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J.M. Rothgeb, M.P. Couper, J.T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 131–148. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1002/0471654728.ch7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Draisma, S., Y. Ongena, and W. Dijkstra. 2005. “Qualified Answers and Other Doubt Expressions as Indicators of Cognitive Problems in a Health Survey.” American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, Miami Beach, FL, May 2005. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2005f.html (accessed June 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Fox Tree, J.E. 2002. “Interpreting Pauses and Ums at Turn Exchanges.” Discourse Processes 34(1): 37–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3401_2.10.1207/S15326950DP3401_2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Fox Tree, J.E. 2007. “Folk notions of um and uh, you know, and like.” Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 23(3): 297–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.012.10.1515/TEXT.2007.012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Garbarski, D., N.C. Schaeffer, and J. Dykema. 2011. “Are Interactional Behaviors Exhibited When the Self-Reported Health Question Is Asked Associated with Health Status?“ Social Science Research 40(4): 1025–1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.002.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.002317377721927518
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1996. “Contact-Level Influences on Cooperation in Face-to-Face Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 12(1): 63–83. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/contact-level-influences-on-cooperation-in-face-to-face-surveys.pdf (accessed June 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Groves, R.M. and K. McGonagle. 2001. “A Theory-Guided Interviewer Training Protocol Regarding Survey Participation.” Journal of Official Statistics 17(2): 249–266. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/a-theory-guided-interviewer-training-protocol-regardingsurvey-participation.pdf (accessed June 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Groves, R.M., B.C. O’Hare, D. Gould-Smith, J.R. Benkí, and P. Maher. 2008. “Telephone Interviewer Voice Characteristics and the Survey Participation Decision.” In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by J.M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J.M. Brick, E.D. De Leeuw, L. Japec, P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Link, and R.L. Sangster, 385–400. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470173404.ch18
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Hauser, R.M. 2005. “Survey Response in the Long Run: The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.” Field Methods 17(1): 3–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1525822X04272452.10.1177/1525822X04272452
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. and H. van den Bergh. 2002. “Effects of Introductions in Large-Scale Telephone Survey Interviews.” In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer, and J. van der Zouwen, 205–218. New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Mathiowetz, N.A. 1999. “Respondent Uncertainty as Indicator of Response Quality.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 11(3): 289–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.3.289.10.1093/ijpor/11.3.289
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Maynard, D.W., J. Freese, and N.C. Schaeffer. 2010. “Calling for Participation: Requests, Blocking Moves, and Rational (Inter)action in Survey Introductions.” American Sociological Review 75(5): 791–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0003122410379582.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Maynard, D.W. and N.C. Schaeffer. 1997. “Keeping the Gate: Declinations of the Request to Participate in a Telephone Survey Interview.” Sociological Methods & Research 26(1): 34–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124197026001002.10.1177/0049124197026001002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Maynard, D.W., H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaffer, and J. van der Zouwen. 2002. Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer, and J. van der Zouwen. New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Morton-Williams, J. 1993. Interviewer Approaches. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth Publishing.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Oksenberg, L. and C.F. Cannell. 1988. “Effects of Interviewer Vocal Characteristics on Nonresponse.” In Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by R.M. Groves, P.P. Biemer, L.E. Lyberg, J.T. Massey, W.L. Nicholls II, and J. Waksberg, 257–272. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Schaeffer, N.C. forthcoming. “Interaction before and during the survey interview: Insights from conversation analysis.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Schaeffer, N.C. and J. Dykema. 2011. “Response 1 to Fowler’s Chapter: Coding the Behavior of Interviewers and Respondents to Evaluate Survey Questions.” In Question Evaluation Methods: Contributing to the Science of Data Quality, edited by J. Madans, K. Miller, A. Maitland, and G. Willis, 23–39. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118037003.ch3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Schaeffer, N.C., D. Garbarski, J. Freese, and D.W. Maynard. 2013. “An Interactional Model of the Call for Participation in the Survey Interview: Actions and Reactions in the Survey Recruitment Call.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77(1): 323–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft006.10.1093/poq/nft006407289424976648
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Schaeffer, N.C. and D.W. Maynard. 2002. “Occasions for Intervention: Interactional Resources for Comprehension in Standardized Survey Interviews.” In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer, and J. van der Zouwen, 261–280. New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Schaeffer, N.C., B.H. Min, T. Purnell, D. Garbarski, and J. Dykema. 2018. “Greeting and Response: Predicting Participation from the Call Opening?” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1(1): 122–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx014.10.1093/jssam/smx014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Schegloff, E. 2010. “Some Other “Uh(m)”s.” Discourse Processes 47(2): 130–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903223380.10.1080/01638530903223380
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Schober, M.F. and J.E. Bloom. 2004. “Discourse Cues that Respondents Have Misunderstood Survey Questions.” Discourse Processes 38(3): 287–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3803_1.10.1207/s15326950dp3803_1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Schober, M.F., F.G. Conrad, W. Dijkstra, and Y.P. Ongena. 2012. “Disfluencies and Gaze Aversion in Unreliable Responses to Survey Questions.” Journal of Official Statistics 28(4): 555–582. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/disfluencies-and-gaze-aversion-in-unreliable-responses-to-survey-questions.pdf (accessed June 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Sharf, D.J. and M.E. Lehman. 1984. “Relationship between the speech characteristics and effectiveness of telephone interviewers.” Journal of Phonetics 12(3): 219–228. Abstract: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-22253-001 (accessed June 2019).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30878-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Shriberg, E. 1996. “Disfluencies in Switchboard.” Proceedings, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP ’96), Vol. Addendum, 11–14. Philadelphia, PA, October 3–6, 1996. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.16.5822&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed June 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Smith, V.L. and H.H. Clark. 1993. “On the Course of Answering Questions.” Journal of Memory and Language 32(1): 25–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1002.10.1006/jmla.1993.1002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Sturgis, P. and P. Campanelli. 1998. “The Scope for Reducing Refusals in Household Surveys: An Investigation Based on Transcripts of Tape-Recorded Doorstep Interactions.” Journal of the Market Research Society 40(2): 121–139. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/214805239/fulltextPDF/7DBB4A59542349A9PQ/1?accountid=465 (accessed June 2019).10.1177/147078539804000207
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Van der Vaart, W., Y. Ongena, A. Hoogendoorn, and W. Dijkstra. 2006. “Do Interviewers’ Voice Characteristics Influence Cooperation Rates in Telephone Surveys?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18(4): 488–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh117.10.1093/ijpor/edh117
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7367
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 529 - 559
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2018
Accepted on: Oct 1, 2019
Published on: Jul 24, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Participation,
nonresponse,
disfluencies,
recruitment,
survey introduction,
interviewer-respondent interaction
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics

© 2020 Bo Hee Min, Nora Cate Schaeffer, Dana Garbarski, Jennifer Dykema, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 36 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)Next article