Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Evolution of the Initially Recruited SHARE Panel Sample Over the First Six Waves

Journal of Official Statistics
Volume 36 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion Research). 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys (9th ed.). AAPOR. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed August 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Banks, J., M. Alastair, and J.P. Smith. 2011. “Attrition and Health in Ageing Studies: Evidence from ELSA and HRS.” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 2: 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v2i2.115.10.14301/llcs.v2i2.115387299924376472
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bergmann, M., T. Kneip, G. De Luca, and A. Scherpenzeel. 2019. Survey Participation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Wave 1–7. SHARE Working Paper Series 31-2017. Munich, Germany: Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy. Available at: http://www.share-project.org/uploads/tx_sharepublications/WP_Series_41_2019_Bergmann_et_al.pdf (accessed February 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bianchi, A. and S. Biffignandi. 2017. “Representativeness in Panel Surveys.” Mathematical Population Studies 24: 126 – 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2016.1271650.10.1080/08898480.2016.1271650
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bianchi, A. and S. Biffignandi. 2019. “Social Indicators to Explain Response in Longitudinal Studies.” Social Indicators Research 141: 931–957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1874-7.10.1007/s11205-018-1874-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Binder, D. 1998. “Longitudinal Surveys: Why Are These Surveys Different from All Other Surveys?” Survey Methodology 24: 101–108. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/12-001-X19980024347 (accessed June 2020).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Börsch-Supan, A., M. Brandt, C. Hunkler, T. Kneip, J. Korbmacher, F. Malter, B. Schaan, S. Stuck, and S. Zuber. 2013. “Data Resource Profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).” International Journal of Epidemiology 42: 992–1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt088.10.1093/ije/dyt088378099723778574
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Börsch-Supan, A. 2017. Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 1. Release version: 6.0.0. SHARE-ERIC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w1.600.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Bristle, J., M. Celidoni, C. Dal Bianco, and G. Weber. 2019. “The Contributions of Paradata and Features of Respondents, Interviewers and Survey Agencies to Panel Co-Operation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 182: 3–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12391.10.1111/rssa.12391670606131439985
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Buck, N., J. Burton, H. Laurie, P. Lynn, and S.C.N. Uhrig. 2006. Quality Profile: British Household Panel. Survey Version 2.0: Waves 1 to 13: 1991–2003. Colchester, UK: University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. De Luca, G., C. Rossetti, and F. Malter. 2013. “Sample Design and Weighting Strategies in SHARE Wave 5.” In SHARE Wave 5: Innovations & Methodology, edited by F. Malter and A. Börsch-Supan, 75–84. Munich, Germany: Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Eurostat. 2004–2015. Available at: “https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/population-demo-graphy-migration-projections/population-projections-/database (accessed June 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Fitzgerald, J., P. Gottschalk, and R. Moffitt. 1998. “An Analysis of Sample Attrition in Panel Data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics.” The Journal of Human Resources 33: 251–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/146433.10.2307/146433
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Leon, D.A. 2011. “Trends in European life expectancy: a salutary view.” International Journal of Epidemiology 40: 271–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr061.10.1093/ije/dyr06121415000
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Lepkowski, J.M. and M.P. Couper. 2002. “Nonresponse in the Second Wave of Longitudinal Household Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R. J.A. Little, 259–272. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Lugtig, P. 2014. “Panel Attrition.” Sociological Methods & Research 43: 699–723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113520305.10.1177/0049124113520305
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Luiten, A. and B. Schouten. 2013. “Tailored fieldwork design to increase representative household survey response: an experiment in the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176: 169–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Lynn, P. 2009. “Methods for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 1–19. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Lynn, P. and P. Lugtig. 2017. “Total Survey Error for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Total Survey Error in Practice, edited by P.P. Biemer, E. De Leeuw, S. Eckman, B. Edwards, F. Kreuter, L.E. Lyberg, N.C. Tucker, and B.T. West, 279–298. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119041702.ch13
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Mood, C. 2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do what We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do about It.” European Sociological Review 26: 67–82.10.1093/esr/jcp006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Moore, J.C., G.B. Durrant, and P.W. F. Smith. 2016. “Data Set Representativeness during Data Collection in Three UK Social Surveys: Generalizability and the Effects of Auxiliary Covariate Choice.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society): 229–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12256.10.1111/rssa.12256
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Myrskylä, M., J.R. Goldstein, and Y.A. Cheng. 2013. “New Cohort Fertility Forecasts for the Developed World: Rises, Falls, and Reversals.” Population and Development Review 39: 31–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00572.x.10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00572.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Olsen, R.J. 2018. “Respondent Attrition Versus Data Attrition and Their Reduction.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research, edited by D.L. Vannette and J.A. Krosnick, 155–158. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_20
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. RISQ. 2015. Representative Indicators for Survey Quality-Tools. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. Available at: https://www.cmist.manchester.ac.uk/research/-projects/representative-indicators-for-survey-quality/tools/ (accessed August 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Roberts, C., C. Vandenplas, and M.E. Stähli. 2014. “Evaluating the Impact of Response Enhancement Methods on the Risk of Nonresponse Bias and Survey Costs.” Survey Research Methods 8: 67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2014.v8i2.5459.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Schoeni, R.F., F. Stafford, K.A. McGonagle, and P. Andreski. 2013. “Response Rates in National Panel Surveys.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 60–87.10.1177/0002716212456363355514023358122
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Schouten, B., J. Bethlehem, K. Beullens, Ø. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, A. Luiten, Ka. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response through R-Indicators and Partial R-Indicators.” International Statistical Review 80: 382–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 1–24. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/indicators-for-monitoring-and-improving-representativeness-of-response.pdf (accessed May 2020).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. SHARE-ERIC. 2018. SHARE Publications: Journal Articles.Available at: http://www.share-project.org/share-publications/journalarticles00.html (accessed August 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Smith, P., P. Lynn, and D. Elliot. 2009. “Sample Design for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by M. Groves, G. Kalton, J.N. Rao, N. Schwarz, C. Skinner, and P. Lynn, 21–33. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Watson, D. 2003. “Sample Attrition between Waves 1 and 5 in the European Community Household Panel.” European Sociological Review 19: 361–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.4.361.10.1093/esr/19.4.361
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2009. “Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 157–181. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch10
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2019. “Chasing Hard-to-Get Cases in Panel Surveys: Is it Worth it?” methods, data, analyses 13: 199–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2018.03.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7367
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 507 - 527
Submitted on: Aug 1, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2020
Published on: Jul 24, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
R-indicator,
wave nonresponse,
mortality- and non-morality-related attrition,
panel sample composition
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics

© 2020 Sabine Friedel, Tim Birkenbach, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 36 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)Next article