Have a personal or library account? Click to login

References

  1. AAPOR. 2016. Standard Definitions’ Final Dispositions of Cases Coded and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Revision 2016. Available at: www.aapor.org/Standards-Ethics/-Standard-Definitions-(1).aspx (accessed April 2020).
  2. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2013. “The Nonresponse Challenge to Surveys and Statistics.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212456815.10.1177/0002716212456815
  3. Beullens, K., G. Loosveldt, C. Vandenplas, and I. Stoop. 2018. “Response Rates in The European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2018-00003.
  4. Blom, A.G., E.D. de Leeuw, and J. Hox. 2011. “Interviewer Effects on Nonresponse in the European Social Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 359–377. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/interviewer-effects-on-nonresponse-in-the-european-social-survey.pdf (accessed April 2020).
  5. Brick, J.M. 2013. “Unit Nonresponse and Weighting Adjustments: A Critical Review.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 329–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0026.10.2478/jos-2013-0026
  6. Brick, M.J. and D. Williams. 2013. “Explaining rising response rates in cross-sectional surveys.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 645: 36–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212456834.10.1177/0002716212456834
  7. Campanelli, P.C., P. Sturgis, and S. Purden. 1997. Can You Hear Me Knocking? An Investigation into the Impact of Interviewers on Survey Response Rates. London: SCPR. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312910100_Can_you_hear_me_knocking_and_investigation_into_the_impact_of_interviewers_on_survey_response_rates (accessed April 2020).
  8. De Leeuw, E., and W. de Heer. 2002. Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison. In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, R.J.A. Little, 41–54. New York: Wiley.
  9. Dillman, D.A. (forthcoming). “Towards Survey Response Rate Theories that no longer pass each other like strangers in the night.” To appear in: Brenner, Philip (Ed). Understanding Survey Methodology: Sociological Theory and Applications. Springer books.
  10. Dillman, D.A., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.
  11. Groves, R.M., R.B. Cialdin, and M.P. Couper. 1992. “Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(4): 475–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/269338.10.1086/269338
  12. Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118490082.10.1002/9781118490082
  13. Groves, R.M., D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, (Eds.) 2002. Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley.
  14. Groves, R.M., E. Singer, and A. Corning. 2000. “Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation. Description and an Illustration.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 299–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/317990.10.1086/31799011114270
  15. Hox, J.J., E.D. de Leeuw, and H. Vorst. 1995. “Survey Participation as Reasoned Action; A Behavioral Paradigm for Survey Nonresponse?” Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique (BMS) 48: 52–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/075910639504800109.10.1177/075910639504800109
  16. Japec, L. 2008. Interviewer Error and Interviewer Burden. In J.M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J.M. Brick, E.D. de Leeuw, L. Japec, P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Link, and R.L. Sangster (Eds.), Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology: 187–211. Hoboken: Wiley.
  17. JOS. 1999. “Special Issue on Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 15(2). available at: https://www.scb.se/en/documentation/statististical-methods/journal-of-official-statistics-jos/ (accessed April 2020).
  18. JOS. 2001. “Special Issue on Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 17(2). Available at: https://www.scb.se/en/documentation/statististical-methods/journal-of-official-statistics-jos/ (accessed April 2020).
  19. JOS. 2011. “Special Issue on Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(4). Available at: https://www.scb.se/en/documentation/statististical-methods/journal-of-official-statistics-jos/ (accessed April 2020).
  20. JOS. 2017. “Special Issue on Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design: Looking Back to See Forward.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(3). Available at: https://www.scb.se/en/-documentation/statististical-methods/journal-of-official-statistics-jos/ (accessed April 2020).10.1515/jos-2017-0027
  21. JOS. 2018. “Special Section on Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design.” Journal of Official Statistics 34(3). Available at: https://www.scb.se/en/documentation/statististical-methods/journal-of-official-statistics-jos/ (accessed April 2020).
  22. Koch, A. and R. Porst. 1998. Nonresponse in Survey Research. ZUMA SPEZIAL, Volume 4, Mannheim: ZUMA. Available at: https://www.gesis.org/en/services/publications/archive/zuma-and-za-publications/zuma-nachrichten-spezial (accessed April 2020).
  23. Kreuter, F. ed. 2013. Improving Surveys with Paradata: Analytic Uses of Process Information. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869.10.1002/9781118596869
  24. Laaksonen, S. 1996. International perspectives on Nonresponse. Helsinki, Statistics Finland. Available at: https://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/176203/xtut_219_dig.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed April 2020).
  25. Loosveldt G. and D. Joye. 2016. Defining and Assessing Survey Climate In: C. Wolf, D. Joye, T.W. Smith, & Y. Fu (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology: 67–76. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893.n6.10.4135/9781473957893.n6
  26. Morton-Williams, J. 1993. Interviewer Approaches. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
  27. Singer, E. 2011. Towards a Cost-Benefit Theory of Survey Participation: Evidence, Further Test, and Implications. Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 379–392. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/toward-abenefit-cost-theory-of-survey-participation-evidence-further-tests-and-implications.pdf (accessed June 2020).
  28. Schouten, B., A. Peytchev, and J. Wagner. 2017. Adaptive Survey Design. Series on Statistics Handbooks. Chapman & Hall/CRC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315153964.10.1201/9781315153964
  29. Stoop, I.A.L. 2005. The Hunt for the Last Respondent. The Hague, Social and Cultural Planning Office.
  30. Stoop, I.A.L. 2016. Unit Nonresponse. In: C. Wolf, D. Joye, T.W. Smith, & Y. Fu (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology: 409–424. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893.n27.10.4135/9781473957893.n27
  31. Stoop, I., J. Billiet, A. Koch, and R. Fitzgerald. 2010. Improving Survey Response. Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons. Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470688335.10.1002/9780470688335
Language: English
Page range: 463 - 468
Published on: Jul 24, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 Edith de Leeuw, Annemieke Luiten, Ineke Stoop, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.