Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring Mechanisms of Recruitment and Recruitment Cooperation in Respondent Driven Sampling Cover

Exploring Mechanisms of Recruitment and Recruitment Cooperation in Respondent Driven Sampling

Journal of Official Statistics
Volume 36 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)
By: Sunghee Lee,  Ai Rene Ong and  Michael Elliott  
Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Abramovitz, D., E.M. Volz, S.A. Strathdee, T.L. Patterson, A. Vera, and S.D. Frost. 2009. “Using Respondent Driven Sampling in a hidden Population at Risk of HIV Infection: Who Do HIV-positive Recruiters Recruit?” Sexually Transmitted Diseases 36(12): 750–756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181b0f311.10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181b0f311278810319704394
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2016. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 9th edition. AAPOR. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed September 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bostwick, W.B., T.L. Hughes, and B. Everett. 2015. “Health behavior, status, and outcomes among a community-based sample of lesbian and bisexual women.” LGBT Health 2(2): 121–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0074.10.1089/lgbt.2014.0074493278026790117
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. CDC. 2015. National HIV Behavioral Surveillance: Injection Drug Use – Round 4 (NHBS-IDU4): Operations Manual. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics/systems/nhbs/NHBS-IDU4-Operations-Manual-2015.pdf (accessed April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Gile, K.J. and M.S. Handcock. 2010. “Respondent-driven sampling: an assessment of current methodology.” Sociological Methodology 40(1): 286 – 327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01223.x.10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01223.x343733622969167
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Gile, K.J. and M.S. Handcock. 2015. “Network model-assisted inference from respondent-driven sampling data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, (Statistics in Society) 178(3): 619–639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12091.10.1111/rssa.12091466907426640328
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Gile, K.J., L.G. Johnston, and M.J. Salganik. 2015. “Diagnostics for respondent-driven sampling.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 178(1): 241–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12059.10.1111/rssa.12059487713627226702
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471725277
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118490082
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Hafeez, S. 2012. A review of the proposed STROBE-RDS reporting checklist as an effective tool for assessing the reporting quality of RDS studies from the developing world. London, UK: LSHTM.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Hathaway, A.D., E. Hyshka, P.G. Erickson, M. Asbridge, S. Brochu, M.M. Cousineau, C. Duff, and D. Marsh. 2010. “Whither RDS? An investigation of respondent driven sampling as a method of recruiting mainstream marijuana users.” Harm Reduction Journal 7(1): 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-7-15.10.1186/1477-7517-7-15290922520618944
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Heckathorn, D.D. 1997. “Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations.” Social Problems 44: 174–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3096941.10.2307/3096941
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Heckathorn, D.D. and C.J. Cameron. 2017. “Network sampling: From snowball and multiplicity to respondent-driven sampling.” Annual Review of Sociology 43: 101–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053556.10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053556
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Kalsbeek, W.D. 2003. “Sampling minority groups in health surveys.” Statistics in Medicine 22: 1527–1549.10.1002/sim.151012704614
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Kalton, G. and D.W. Anderson. 1986. “Sampling rare populations.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 149(1): 65–82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2981886.10.2307/2981886
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Kalton, G. and I. Flores-Cervantes. 2003. “Weighting methods.” Journal of Official Statistics 19(2): 81–97. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41-fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/weighting-methods.pdf (accessed February 2020).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Lee, S. 2009. “Understanding respondent driven sampling from a total survey error perspective.” Survey Practice 2(6) 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2009-0029.10.29115/SP-2009-0029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Lee, S., A.R. Ong, and M. Elliott. 2018. “Two applications of respondent driven sampling: Ethnic minorities and illicit substance users.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Improving Health Research for Small Populations. National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Washington, DC, U.S.A. January 2018. Available at: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_185285.pdf (accessed September 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Lee, S., Z.T. Suzer-Gurtekin, J. Wagner, and R. Valliant. 2017. “Total survey error and respondent driven sampling: Focus on nonresponse and measurement errors in the recruitment process and the network size reports and implications for inferences.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(2): 335–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0017.10.1515/jos-2017-0017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Lee, S., Z.T. Suzer-Gurtekin, J. Wagner, and R. Valliant. 2012. “Exploring error properties of respondent driven sampling.” Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meeting, San Diego, CA, U.S.A. July 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Lee, S., J. Wagner, R. Valliant, and S. Heeringa. 2014. “Recent developments of sampling hard-to-reach populations: an assessment.” In Hard to Survey Populations, edited by R. Tourangeau, B. Edwards, T. Johnson, and K. Wolter: 424–444. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139381635.025
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Li, J., T.W. Valente, H.S. Shin, M. Weeks, A. Zelenev, G. Moothi, H. Mosher, R. Heimer, E. Robles, G. Palmer, and C. Obidoa. 2017. “Overlooked threats to respondent driven sampling estimators: peer recruitment reality, degree measures, and random selection assumption.” AIDS and Behavior 22(7): 2340–2359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1827-1.10.1007/s10461-017-1827-1574530728660381
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Lu, X., L. Bengtsson, T. Britton, M. Camitz, B.J. Kim, A. Thorson, and F. Liljeros. 2012. “The sensitivity of respondent-driven sampling.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 175(1): 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.00711.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.00711.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Luthra, R. 2011. “RDS for Migration Studies? A Review and Invitation to Discuss.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Design, Implementation, and Analysis: An Exploration of Respondent Driven Sampling, London, UK.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Martin, K., T.P. Johnson, and T.L. Hughes. 2015. “Using respondent driven sampling to recruit sexual minority women.” Survey Practice 8(2): 273. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066809/ (accessed April 2020).10.29115/SP-2015-0004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. McCreesh, N., A. Copas, J. Seeley, L.G. Johnston, P. Sonnenberg, R.J. Hayes, S.D.W. Frost, and R.G. White. 2013. “Respondent driven sampling: determinants of recruitment and a method to improve point estimation.” PLoS ONE 8(10): e78402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078402.10.1371/journal.pone.0078402381496424205221
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Selvaraj, V., K. Boopathi, P. Paranjape, and S. Mehendale. 2016. “A single weighting approach to analyze respondent-driven sampling data.” The Indian Journal of Medical Research 144(3): 447–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.198665.10.4103/0971-5916.198665532085128139544
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Schouten, B., A. Peytchev, and J. Wagner. 2017. Adaptive Survey Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.10.1201/9781315153964
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Shadish, W.R. and T.D. Cook. 1999. “Design rules: More steps towards a complete theory of quasi-experimentation.” Statistical Science 294–300.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Singer, E. 2002. “The use of incentives to reduce nonresponse in household surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 163–178. New York, NY: Wiley. 163–177
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Stein, M.L., V. Buskens, P.G.M. van der Heijden, J.E. van Steenbergen, A. Wong, M.C.J. Bootsma, and M.E.E. Kretzschmar. 2018. “A stochastic simulation model to study respondent-driven recruitment.” PLoS One 13(11): e0207507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207507.10.1371/journal.pone.0207507623741330440047
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Strömdahl, S., X. Lu, L. Bengtsson, F. Liljeros, and A. Thorson. 2015. “Implementation of Web-based respondent driven sampling among men who have sex with men in Sweden.” PLoS ONE 10(10): e0138599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138599.10.1371/journal.pone.0138599459133326426802
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Tomas, A. and K.J. Gile. 2011. “The effect of differential recruitment, non-response and non-recruitment on estimators for respondent-driven sampling.” Electronic Journal of Statistics 5: 899–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/11-EJS630.10.1214/11-EJS630
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Tucker, C., M.P. Cohen, A. KewalRamani, and S. Eyster. 2015. “Surveying the District of Columbia GLBT community using respondent-driven sampling.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 2015. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/AnnualMeetingProceedings/2015/A3-3-Tucker.pdf (accessed September 2019).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Verdery, A.M., M.G. Merli, J. Moody, J. Smith, and J.C. Fisher. 2015. “Respondent-driven sampling estimators under real and theoretical recruitment conditions of female sex workers in China.” Epidemiology 26(5): 661–665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000335.10.1097/EDE.0000000000000335461753926214337
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Volz, E. and D.D. Heckathorn. 2008. “Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling.” Journal of Official Statistics 24(1): 79–97. DOI: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/probability-based-estimation-theory-for-respondent-driven-sampling.pdf (accessed May 2020).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Wagner, J. and S. Lee. 2014. “Sampling rare populations.” In Handbook of Health Survey Methods, edited by T.P. Johnson, 77–104. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.10.1002/9781118594629.ch4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. White, R.G., A.J. Hakim, M.J. Salganik, M.W. Spiller, L.G. Johnston, L. Kerr, C. Kendall, A. Drake, D. Wilson, K. Orroth, M. Egger, and W. Hladik. 2015. “Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statement.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 68(12): 1463–1471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.002.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.002466930326112433
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. World Health Organization and UNAIDS. 2013. Introduction to HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infection surveillance: Module 4: Introduction to Respondent Driven Sampling. Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: http://applications.emro.who.int/dsaf/EMRPUB_2013_EN_1539.pdf (accessed June 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7367
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 339 - 360
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2018
|
Accepted on: Nov 1, 2019
|
Published on: Jun 15, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Respondent driven sampling,
sampling hard-to-reach population,
nonresponse error
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics

© 2020 Sunghee Lee, Ai Rene Ong, Michael Elliott, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 36 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)Next article