Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Probing for Informal Work Activity Cover
Open Access
|Sep 2019

References

  1. Abraham, K.G., J.C. Haltiwanger, K. Sandusky, and J.R. Spletzer. 2018. “Measuring the Gig Economy: Current Knowledge and Open Issues.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 24950. August. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w24950.10.3386/w24950
  2. Abraham, K.G. and S.N. Houseman. 2018. “Making Ends Meet: The Role of Informal Work in Supplementing Americans’ Income.” Upjohn Institute, unpublished working paper. December. Available at: https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2019/preliminary/paper/QreAaS2h (accessed July 2019).10.17848/wp19-315
  3. Allard, M.D. and A.E. Polivka. 2018. “Measuring Labor Market Activity Today: Are the Words Work and Job Too Limiting for Surveys?” Monthly Labor Review. November. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2018/article/pdf/measuring-labor-market-activity-today.htm (accessed April 2019).
  4. Belli, R.F., N. Schwarz, E. Singer, and J. Talarico. 2000. “Decomposition Can Harm the Accuracy of Behavioural Frequency Reports.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 14: 295–308. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200007/08)14:4<295::AID-ACP646>3.0.CO;2-1.10.1002/1099-0720(200007/08)14:4<;295::AID-ACP646>3.0.CO;2-1
  5. Blair, E. and S. Burton. 1987. “Cognitive Processes Used by Survey Respondents to Answer Behavioral Frequency Questions.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(2): 280–288. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/209112.10.1086/209112
  6. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 2017. Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2016. Washington, D.C: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/2016-report-economic-well-being-us-households-201705.pdf (accessed May 2019).
  7. Bower, G.H. and S.G. Gilligan. 1979. “Remembering Information Related to One’s Self.” Journal of Research in Personality 13: 420–432. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(79)90005-9.10.1016/0092-6566(79)90005-9
  8. Bracha, A. and M.A. Burke. 2018. “The Ups and Downs of the Gig Economy, 2015–2017.” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper 18–12. October. Available at: https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/research-department-working-paper/2018/the-ups-and-downs-of-the-gig-economy-2015-2017.aspx (accessed May 2019).
  9. Bracha, A. and M. A. Burke. 2019. “How Big is the Gig?” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, unpublished working paper. January.
  10. Brown, N.R., L.J. Rips, and S.K. Shevell. 1985. “The Subjective Dates of Natural Events in Very-Long-Term Memory.” Cognitive Psychology 17(2): 139 – 177. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90006-4.10.1016/0010-0285(85)90006-4
  11. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Undated. “Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey: Frequently Asked Questions.” Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cps/faq.htm (accessed June 2018).
  12. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2018. “Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, May 2017.” Available at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/conemp.pdf (accessed June 2018).
  13. Cohany, S.R. 1996. “Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements.” Monthly Labor Review. October: 31–45. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/mlr/1996/10/art4full.pdf (accessed May 2019).
  14. Dashen, M. 2000. “The Effects of Retention Intervals on Self- and Proxy Reports of Purchases.” Memory 8(3): 129–143. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/096582100387560.10.1080/096582100387560
  15. Fowler, F.J., Jr. 1992. “How Unclear Terms Affect Survey Data.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(2): 218–231. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/269312.10.1086/269312
  16. Katz, L.F. and A.B. Krueger. 2019a. “Understanding Trends in Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States.” NBER Working Paper No. 25425. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w25425.10.3386/w25425
  17. Katz, L.F. and A.B. Krueger. 2019b. “The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015.” ILR Review 72(2): 382–416. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0019793918820008.10.1177/0019793918820008
  18. Kojetin, B.A. and L.A. Miller. 1993. “The Intrahousehold Communications Study: Estimating the Accuracy of Proxy Responses at the Dyadic Level.” Paper presented at the 48th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Charles, Illinois. May. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/papers/1993_188.pdf (accessed May 2019).
  19. Kuiper, N.A. and T.B. Rogers. 1979. “Encoding of Personal Information: Self-Other Differences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(4): 499–514. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.499.10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.499
  20. Martin, E. 2006. “Survey Questionnaire Construction.” U.S. Census Bureau Research Report Series, Survey Methodology #2006-13. Available at: https://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/rsm2006-13.pdf. (accessed May 2019).
  21. Martin, E. and A.E. Polivka. 1995. “Diagnostics for Redesigning Survey Questionnaires: Measuring Work in the Current Population Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59(4): 547–567. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/269493.10.1086/269493
  22. Menon, G. 1997. “Are the Parts Better than the Whole? The Effects of Decompositional Questions on Judgments of Frequent Behaviors.” Journal of Marketing Research 34(3): 335–346. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224379703400303.10.1177/002224379703400303
  23. Phillips, J.M., B.A. Bickart, and G. Menon. 2006. “Reporting About Others’ Behavior: The Role of Judgment Strategy, Knowledge, and Regularity.” September. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=946247 (accessed April 2019).10.2139/ssrn.946247
  24. Polivka, A.E. 1996. “A Profile of Contingent Workers.” Monthly Labor Review. October: 10–21. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1996/article/profile-of-contingent-workers.htm (accessed May 2019).
  25. Robles, B. and M. McGee. 2016. Exploring Online and Offline Informal Work: Findings from the Enterprising and Informal Work Activities (EIWA) Survey. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2016.089.10.17016/FEDS.2016.089
  26. Schober, M.F. and F.G. Conrad. 1997. “Does Conversational Interviewing Reduce Survey Measurement Error?” Public Opinion Quarterly 61(4): 576–602. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/297818.10.1086/297818
  27. Schober, M.F., A.L. Suessbrick, and F.G. Conrad. 2018. “When Do Misunderstandings Matter? Evidence from Survey Interviews about Smoking.” Topics in Cognitive Science 10(2): 452–484. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12330.10.1111/tops.1233029630774
  28. Schwarz, N. 1999. “Self-Reports: How the Questions Shape the Answers.” American Psychologist 54(2): 93–105. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93.10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93
  29. Schwarz, N. and T. Wellens. 1997. “Cognitive Dynamics of Proxy Responding: The Diverging Perspectives of Actors and Observers.” Journal of Official Statistics 13(2): 159–179. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1.1.39.5355.
  30. Sudman, S. and N.M. Bradburn. 1973. “Effects of Time and Memory Factors on Response in Surveys.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 68: 805–815. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2284504.10.2307/2284504
  31. Sudman, S., N.M. Bradburn, and N. Schwarz. 1996. Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  32. Tourangeau, R. 2000. “Remembering What Happened: Memory Errors and Survey Report.” In The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice, edited by A.A. Stone, C.A. Bachrach, J.B. Jobe, H.S. Kurtzman, and V.S. Cain, 29–47. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  33. Tourangeau, R., F.G. Conrad, M.P. Couper, and C. Ye. 2014. “The Effects of Providing Examples in Survey Questions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78(1): 100–125. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft083.10.1093/poq/nft083
  34. Tourangeau, R., L.J. Rips, and K. Rasinski. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819322
  35. U.S. Census Bureau. 2006. Design and Methodology: Current Population Survey, Technical Paper No. 66. Washington DC. Available at: https://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/tp-66.pdf (accessed July 2019).
Language: English
Page range: 487 - 508
Submitted on: Aug 1, 2018
|
Accepted on: May 1, 2019
|
Published on: Sep 9, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Katharine G. Abraham, Ashley Amaya, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.