References
- Amar, R., J. Eagan, and J. Stasko. 2005. “Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization.” IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005, October 23–25 2005. 111–117. Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A. IEEE.
- Arntz, M., T. Gregory, and U. Zierahn. 2016. “The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries.” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en.
- Battista, G.D., P. Eades, R. Tamassia, and I.G. Tollis. 1998. Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Bostock, M., V. Ogievetsky, and J. Heer. 2011. “D3: Data-Driven Documents.” IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics (Proc. InfoVis). Available at: http://vis.stanford.edu/papers/d3/ (accessed April 2017).
- Briscoe, G. and C. Mulligan. 2014. “Digital Innovation”: The Hackathon Phenomenon. Creative works London Working Paper. Queen Mary University of London. Available at: http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/7682 (accessed December 2017).
- Burt, R.S. 1984. “Network items in the general social survey.” Social Networks 6: 293–339. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(84)90007-8.
- European Commission. 2013. ESCO – European Classification of Skills/Competences, Qualifications and Occupations – The first public release. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=7676 (accessed April 2017).
- European Commission. 2017a. Description of the European Big Data Hackathon. Eurostat. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/system/files/european_big_data_hackathon_-_description.pdf (accessed December 2017).
- European Commission. 2017b. European Big Data Hackathon. Eurostat. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/EU-BD-Hackathon_en. (accessed December 2017).
- European Commission. 2017c. Hackathon Data Catalogue. Eurostat. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/content/hackathon-data-catalogue_en (accessed December 2017).
- European Commission. 2017d. Panel of evaluators. Eurostat. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/content/panel-evaluators_en (accessed December 2017).
- Frey, C.B. and M.A. Osborne. 2016. “The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114: 254–280. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.
- Frey, C.B. and M.A. Osborne. 2018. Automation and the Future of Work – Understanding the Numbers. Available at: https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/opinion/view/404. (accessed April 2018).
- Ghoniem, M., J.D. Fekete, and P. Castagliola. 2005. “On the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations: a controlled experiment and statistical analysis.” Information Visualization 4(2): 114–135. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500092.
- Hardy, W., D. Autor, and D. Acemoglu. 2016. “Occupation classifications crosswalks – from O*NET- SOC to ISCO.” [Online]. Available at: http://ibs.org.pl/en/resources/occupation-classifications-crosswalks-from-onet-soc-to-isco/. (accessed April 2017).
- Hu, Y. 2005. “Efficient, high-quality force-directed graph drawing.” Mathematica Journal 10(1): 37–71. Available at: http://www.mathematica-journal.com/issue/v10i1/graph_draw.html (accessed October 2018).
- Huai, Y., A. Chauhan, A. Gates, G. Hagleitner, E.N. Hanson, O. O’Malley, J. Pandey, Y. Yuan, R. Lee, and X. Zhang. 2014. “Major technical advancements in apache hive.” In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, June 2014: 1235–1246. New York. NY, U.S.A., ACM.
- International Labour Organization. 2008. ISCO – International Standard Classification of Occupations. Switzerland Geneva: International Labour Office. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/index.htm (accessed April 2017).
- Jones, C. 1997. The Year 2000 Software Problem: Quantifying the Costs and Assessing the Consequences. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=267961 (accessed December 2017).
- Kandel, S., J. Heer, C. Plaisant, J. Kennedy, F. van Ham, N.H. Riche, C. Weaver, B. Lee, D. Brodbeck, and P. Buono. 2011. “Research directions in data wrangling: Visualizations and transformations for usable and credible data.” Information Visualization 10(4) : 271–288. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473871611415994.
- LeCun, Y., Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton. 2015. “Deep learning.” Nature 521(7553): 436–444. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.
- Lerman, R.I. and S.R. Schmidt. 2005. Trends and challenges for work in the 21st century. Future Work, US Dept. of Labor, The Urban Institute, Washington DC. Available at: https://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/history/herman/reports/futurework/report.htm (accessed April 2017).
- Merluzzi, J. and R.S. Burt. 2013. “How many names are enough? Identifying network effects with the least set of listed contacts.” Social Networks 35(3): 331–337. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.03.004.
- Mitchell, T. and E. Brynjolfsson. 2017. “Track how technology is transforming work.” Nature 544(7650): 290. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/544290a.
- Mogensen, K.A., K. Brown, A.D. Baedkel, K. Gu, M. Fert-Malka, N.T. Hemmingsen, L. Borgstrom-Hansen, C.S. Petersen, and O. Denysenko. 2014. Trends for Tomorrow. Member’s Report 4/2014. Copenhagen Institute for Futures Studies. Available at: https://cifs.dk/publications/members-reports/ (accessed October 2018).
- Opik, R. 2017a. “The prototype.” Available at: https://rainopik.github.io/eubdhackmegatrend/ (accessed October 2018).
- Opik, R. 2017b. “The source code of the prototype.” Available at: https://github.com/rainopik/eubdhack-megatrend/ (accessed October 2018).
- Peixoto, T.P. 2014. “The graph-tool python library.” figshare. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1164194.
- Smith, G. 2010. PostgreSQL 9.0: High Performance. Packt Publishing Ltd.
- Stasko, J. 2014. “Value-driven evaluation of visualizations.” In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization. (pp. 46–53). ACM.
- Thusoo, A., J.S. Sarma, N. Jain, Z. Shao, P. Chakka, S. Anthony, H. Liu, P. Wyckoff, and R. Murthy. 2009. “Hive: a warehousing solution over a map-reduce framework.” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 2(2): 1626–1629. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14778/1687553.1687609.
- West, D.B. 2001. Introduction to Graph Theory. New York: Prentice Hall.
- Wieling, M., and L. Borghans. 2001. “Descrepancies between supply and demand and adjustment processes in the labour market.” Labour 15(1): 33–56. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00154.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2010. Standard Occupational Classification. Washington DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/soc/. (accessed April 2018).
- U.S. Department of Labor/Employment and Training Administration. 2010. The O*NETSOC Taxonomy. Available at: https://www.onetcenter.org/taxonomy.html (accessed December 2017).
- Zukin, S. and M. Papadantonakis. 2017. “Hackathons as Co-optation Ritual: Socializing Workers and Institutionalizing Innovation in the ‘New’ Economy.” In Precarious Work. (pp. 157–181). Emerald Publishing Limited.