Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Transitioning a Survey to Self-Administration using Adaptive, Responsive, and Tailored (ART) Design Principles and Data Visualization Cover

Transitioning a Survey to Self-Administration using Adaptive, Responsive, and Tailored (ART) Design Principles and Data Visualization

By: Joe Murphy,  Paul Biemer and  Chip Berry  
Open Access
|Sep 2018

References

  1. AAPOR (The American Association for Public Opinion Research). 2015. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 8th edition. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: AAPOR.
  2. Amaya, A., P. Biemer, and D. Kinyon. 2017. “Total Error in a Big Data World with Applications to the Residential Energy Consumption Survey.” Presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
  3. Biemer, P. 2010. “Total Survey Error: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 817–848. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq058.10.1093/poq/nfq058
  4. Biemer, P., K.H. Harris, B. Burke, K. Considine, C. Halpern, and C. Suchindran. 2017a. “Transitioning an In-Person Longitudinal Survey to a Mixed-Mode, Two-Phase Survey Design: Preliminary Results.” Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. New Orleans, LA.
  5. Biemer, P., J. Murphy, S. Zimmer, C. Berry, G. Deng, and K. Lewis. 2017b. “Using Bonus Monetary Incentives to Encourage Web Response in Mixed-Mode Household Surveys.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx015.10.1093/jssam/smx015
  6. Breyfogle, F. 2003. Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Camoes, J. 2008. How to Create a Thematic Map in Excel. Available at: http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/how-to-create-thematic-map-excel/ (accessed November 26, 2017).
  8. Chun, A.Y., B. Schouten, and J. Wagner. 2017. “JOS Special Issue on Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design: Looking Back to See Forward – Editorial.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(3): 571–577. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2017-0027.10.1515/JOS-2017-0027
  9. Cleveland, W. 1993. Visualizing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
  10. Cramér, H. 1946. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400883868
  11. Dillman, D., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, and Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 4th Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781394260645
  12. Dillman, D.A. and M.L. Edwards. 2016. “Designing a Mixed-Mode Survey.” In Wolfe, Christof, Joye, Dominique, Smith, Tom W. and Fu, Yang-chih, Sage Handbook of Survey Methodology. Sage Publications Wolf, Joye, Smith and Fu. Thousand Oaks. CA, 255–268.
  13. Duprey, M., J. Murphy, P. Biemer, and R. Chew. 2017. “Veni, Vidi, Vici: Interactive Data Visualizations for Adaptive Total Design.” Presented at the 5th Workshop on Adaptive and Responsive Survey Design. Ann Arbor, MI.
  14. Eddy, W.F. and Marton, K., Editors. 2012. Effective Tracking of Building Energy Use: Improving the Commercial Buildings and Residential Energy Consumption Surveys. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
  15. Edgar, J., J. Murphy, and M. Keating. 2016. “Comparing Traditional and Crowdsourcing Methods for Pretesting Survey Questions.” SAGE Open 6(4): 1–14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016671770.10.1177/2158244016671770
  16. Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.10.1002/0471725277
  17. Groves, R. and S. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 169(3): 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x
  18. Hardin, M., D. Horn, R. Perez, and L. Williams. 2012. “Which Chart or Graph is Right for You? Telling Impactful Stories with Data.” Tableau Software. Available at: http://theathenaforum.org/sites/default/files/WHich%20chart%20is%20right%20for%20you.pdf (accessed November 26, 2017).
  19. Hornbaek, K. and E. Frokjaer. 2003. “Reading Patterns and Usability in Visualizations of Electronic Documents.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 10(2): 119–149. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/772047.772050.10.1145/772047.772050
  20. Howden, L., S. Joestl, and R. Cohen. 2015. Improving Response Rates using a Mixed-Mode Approach: Results from the National Health Care Interview Survey. Presented at the 2015 FedCASIC Conference. Available at: https://www.census.gov/fedcasic/fc2015/ppt/27_howden.pdf (accessed November 21, 2017).
  21. Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
  22. Laflamme, F. and J. Wagner. 2016. “Responsive and Adaptive Designs.” In The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology, edited by C. Wolf, D. Joye, T. Smith, and Y. Fu. Los Angeles: Sage.10.4135/9781473957893.n26
  23. Link, M. and A. Mokdad. 2005. “Alternative Modes for Health Surveillance Surveys: an Experiment with Web, Mail, and Telephone.” Epidemiology 16: 701–704. Doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000172138.67080.7f.10.1097/01.ede.0000172138.67080.7f16135951
  24. Luiten, A. and B. Schouten. 2013. “Tailored Fieldwork Design to Increase Representative Household Survey Response: an Experiment in the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 176: 169–189. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x
  25. Morganstein, D.R. and D.A. Marker. 1997. “Continuous Quality Improvement in Statistical Agencies.” In Survey Measurement and Process Quality, edited by L.E. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E.D. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin. (pp. 475–500). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Murphy, J., D. Mayclin, A. Richards, and D. Roe. 2016. “A Multi-method Approach to Survey Pretesting.” In 2015 FCSM Research Conference Proceedings. Available at: https://fcsm.sites.usa.gov/files/2016/03/D3_Murphy_2015FCSM.pdf. (accessed November 26, 2017).
  27. Murphy, J., P. Biemer, M. Duprey, and R. Chew. 2017. “Interactive Adaptive Total Design Reports for Near Real-Time Survey Monitoring.” Presented at the 2017 Conference of the European Survey Research Association. Lisbon, Portugal.
  28. Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indictators of Representativeness of Survey Nonresponse.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.
  29. Schouten, B., A. Peytchev, and J. Wagner. 2017. Adaptive Survey Design. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781315153964
  30. Tufte, E. 2001. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (2nd ed.). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. ISBN 0-9613921-4-2.
  31. U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. American Community Survey (ACS) 2014 Data Release New and Noteable. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/news/data-releases/2014/release.html#par_textimage_12. (accessed November 21, 2017).
  32. Zimmer, S., P. Biemer, P. Kott, and C. Berry. 2016. “Testing a Model-Directed, Mixed Mode Protocol in the RECS Pilot Study.” In 2015 FCSM Research Conference Proceedings. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sitesusa/wp-content/uploads/sites/242/2016/03/G2_Zimmer_2015FCSM.pdf. (accessed November 26, 2017).
Language: English
Page range: 625 - 648
Submitted on: Mar 1, 2016
|
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2018
|
Published on: Sep 1, 2018
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Joe Murphy, Paul Biemer, Chip Berry, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.