Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Business Data Collection: Toward Electronic Data Interchange. Experiences in Portugal, Canada, Sweden, and the Netherlands with EDI Cover

Business Data Collection: Toward Electronic Data Interchange. Experiences in Portugal, Canada, Sweden, and the Netherlands with EDI

Journal of Official Statistics
Volume 34 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)
By: Gert Buiten,  Ger Snijkers,  Paulo Saraiva,  Johan Erikson,  Anna-Greta Erikson and  Alice Born  
Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. Baker, R., J.M. Brick, N.A. Bates, M. Battaglia, M.P. Couper, J.A. Dever, K.J. Gile, and R. Tourangeau 2013. “Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2013(I): 90–143. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt00810.1093/jssam/smt008
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Bakker, B.F.M. and P.J.H. Daas 2012. “Methodological Challenges in Register-Based Research.” Statistica Neerlandica (special issue) 66(1): 2–7. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00505.x10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00505.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bavdaz, M. 2010. “Sources of Measurement Errors in Business Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 16(1): 25–42.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bharosa N., R. van Wijk, N. de Winne, and M. Janssen (eds) 2015. Challenging the Chain. Governing the automated exchange and processing of business information. Amsterdam: IOS Press, Available at: www.iospress.nl/book/challenging-the-chain/ (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Biemer, P.P. and L.E. Lyberg. 2003. Introduction to Survey Quality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/0471458740
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Born, A. 2016. “Harmonizing Financial Information from Businesses at Statistics Canada.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys: Statistics (ICESV) Switzerland, 20-23 June 2016, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/146_ices15Final00226.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Buiten, G., R. Boom, M. Roos, and G. Snijkers 2016. “Issues in Automated Financial Data Collection in The Netherlands”. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys: Statistics (ICESV) Switzerland, 20-23 June 2016, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/148_ices15Final00209.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Clayton, R.L., M.A. Searson, and Ch. D. Manning. 2000. “Electronic Data Collection in Selected BLS Establishment Programs.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Establishment Surveys (ICESII), Montreal, 18-21 June 2000, 439–448. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2000/proceedings/S08.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Couper, M.P., R.P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C.Z.F. Clark, J. Martin, W.L. Nicholls II, and J.M. O’Reilly. 1998. Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection. New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Couper, M.P. and W.L. Nicholls II. 1998. The History and Development of Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection Methods. Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection, edited by M.P. Couper, R.P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C.Z.F. Clarck, J. Martin, W.L. Nicholls II, and J.M. O’Reilly, 1–21. New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Daas, P., M. Puts, B. Buelens, and P. van den Hurk. 2015. “Big Data as a Source for Official Statistics.” Journal of Official Statistics 31(2): 249–262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2015-0016.10.1515/jos-2015-0016
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Daas, P., S. Ossen, M. Tennekes, L.-C. Zhang, C. Hendriks, K. Foldal Haugen, A. Bernardi, F. Cerroni, T. Laitila, A. Wallgren, and B. Wallgren 2011. List of Quality Groups and Indicators Identified for Administrative Data Sources. Luxembourg: Eurostat (BLUE-ETS deliverable 4.1).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. De Bolster, G.W. and K.J. Metz. 1997. The TELER-EDISENT project. Netherlands Official Statistics (Special issue on EDI: The State of the Dutch Art): 12 (autumn), 51–59. Voorburg/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Di Consiglio, L., M. Karlberg, M. Skaliotis, and I. Xirouchakis. 2016. “Overview of Big-Data Research in European Statistics Agencies.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys: Statistics (ICESV) Switzerland, 20-23 June 2016, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/187_ices15Final00346.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Erikson, A.-G., J. Erikson, and C. Hertzman 2016. “Automated Data Collection and Reuse of Concepts in Order to Minimise the Burden.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys: Statistics (ICESV) Switzerland, 20-23 June, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/147_ices15Final00184.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Erikson, J. and L. Nordberg. 2000. “Use of Administrative Data as Substitutes for Survey Data for Small Enterprises in the Swedish Annual Structural Business Statistics.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Establishment Surveys (ICESII), Buffalo, NY, 17-21 June 2000, 813–820. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2000/proceedings/S28.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. European Commission 2016. European Standards for the 21st Century. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/16980 (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Eurostat. 2010. Business registers: Recommendations manual. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/statmanuals/files/KS-32-10-216-EN-C-EN.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Eurostat, 2017. Smart Statistics. Paper discussed at the Joint Dime/ITDG plenary sessions, 14-15 February 2017. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Groves, R.M. 2011. “Three Eras of Survey Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5): 861–871. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr057.10.1093/poq/nfr057
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Groves, R.M. 2013. Official Statistics and “Big Data”. Paper presented at the 2013 European Conference for New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics (NTTS), Brussels, 5-7 March 2013. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2009. Survey Methodology, 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Hansen, J.V. and N.C. Hill. 1989. “Control and Audit of Electronic Data Interchange.” MIS Quarterly 13(4): 403–414. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol13/iss4/2/ (accessed 19 April 2018).10.2307/248724
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Haraldsen, G. 2013. “Quality Issues in Business Surveys.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 83–125. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch03
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Haraldsen, G., J. Jones, D. Giesen, and L.-Ch. Zhang 2013. “Understanding and Coping with Response Burden.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 219–252. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch06
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Haraldsen, G., G. Snijkers, M. Roos, A. Sundvoll, T. Vik, and H.-P. Stax. 2011. Utilizing Web Technology in Business Data Collection: Some Norwegian, Dutch and Danish Experiences, Paper presented at the 2011 European Conference for New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics (NTTS), Brussels, 22-24 February 2011. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Johnson, N. 2016. “One hundred years of Current Employment Statistics Data collection.” Monthly Labor Review: January 2016. Washington DC: US Bureau of Labor Statistics.10.21916/mlr.2016.2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Lunter. L. 1997. EDIsent after the pilot phase (in Dutch: EDIsent na de pilot fase). Report. Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Martineau, P. 2012. Use of the Chart of Accounts in determining the content of Statistics Canada business surveys. Internal document. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Pereira, H.J. 2011. “Simplified Business Information (IES) – Is coordination between public entities really possible.” In Proceedings of the International BLUE-ETS Conference on Burden and Motivation in Official Business Surveys Heerlen, 22-23 March 2011, 177–188. Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands. Available at: https://www.blue-ets.istat.it/index.php?id=78&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=25&cHash=75a34e2a1c989b918ff346a3911c90fc (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Ravindra, D. 2016. “Challenges and Benefits of Producing Business Statistics within a Highly Centralized Model.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys (ICESV), 20-23 June 2016. Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2016/proceedings/153_ices15Final00050.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Reid, G., F. Zabala, and A. Holmberg 2017. “Extending TSE to Administrative Data: A Quality Framework and Case Study from Stats NZ.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(2): 477–511, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-002310.1515/jos-2017-0023
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Saraiva, P. 2016a. Integrated Survey Management System: Statistics Portugal Experience. Presentation at the Fifth International Conference of Establishment Surveys (ICESV), 20-23 June 2016, Geneva, Switzerland. Statistics Switzerland.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Saraiva, P. 2016b. The Experience of Statistics Portugal in the Appropriation of Administrative Data for Statistical Purposes. Invited presentation (in Portuguese) at the 3rd National Conference of Producers and users of Statistics, Geographical and Environmental Information (INFOPLAN). IBGE, December 5-9, 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Saraiva, P. 2016c. Integrating Data Collection: Wins and Challenges. Presentation at the UNECE Workshop on Statistical Data Collection, ‘Visions on Future Surveying’, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague, 1-5 October 2016. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Saraiva, P. and A. Moreira. 2016. Motivating Respondents: the Importance of Personalised Feedback. Presentation at the UNECE Workshop on Statistical Data Collection, ‘Visions on Future Surveying’, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague, 1-5 October 2016. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Smith, P. and P. Phipps. 2014. Preface. Journal of Official Statistics (Special Issue on Establishment Surveys) 30(4): 575–577. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-003810.2478/jos-2014-0038
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Snijkers, G. 2016. “Achieving Quality in Organizational Surveys: An Holistic Approach.” In Methodische Probleme in der empirischen Organisationsforschung, edited by S. Liebig and W. Matiaske, 33–59. Wiesbaden: Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-08713-5_3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Snijkers, G., R. Göttgens, and H. Hermans. 2011. Data Collection and Data Sharing at Statistics Netherlands: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, Paper presented at the 59th Plenary Session of the Conference of European Statisticians (CES): United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Geneva, June 14–16. Geneva: UNECE Available at: www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/2011/20.e.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Snijkers, G., G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack. 2013. Designing and Conducting Business Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Snijkers, G. and J. Jones. 2013. “Business Survey Communication.” Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 359–430. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch09
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Snijkers, G., M. Roos, T. Hooijmans, Th. van Kasteren, M. Storms, V. de Haan, and G. Buiten. 2014. Reference Chart of Accounts (RCSFI): a case study – toward a quality framework (in Dutch: Referentie Grootboekschema (RGS): een casestudie – aanzet tot een kwaliteitskader). Report. Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Srinivasan, V. 2017. The Intelligent Enterprise in the Era of Big Data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118834725
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Statistics Canada 2015. Integrated Business Statistics Program Overview. Catalogue No. 68-515-X. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/68-515-x/2015001/mi-rs-eng.htm.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Thomas, R. and P. McSharry 2015. Big Data Revolution: What Farmers, Doctors and Insurance Agents Tell Us about Discovering Big Data Patterns. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Torres van Grinsven, V., I. Bolko, and M. Bavdaz. 2014. “In Search of Motivation for Business Survey Response Task.” Journal of Official Statistics, 30(4): 579–606. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-003910.2478/jos-2014-0039
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. UNECE 1995. Guidelines for the Modelling of Statistical Data and Metadata. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/metadatamodeling.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. UNECE. 2000. Terminology on Statistical Metadata. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/coded_files/UNECE_TERMINOLOGY_STAT_METADATA_2000_EN.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. UNECE. 2007. Register-based statistics in the Nordic countries: review of best practices with focus on population and social statistics. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/Register_based_statistics_in_Nordic_countries.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. UNECE. 2011. Using Administrative and Secondary Sources for Official Statistics: A Handbook of Principles and Practices. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/Using_Administrative_Sources_Final_for_web.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Wallgren, A. and B. Wallgren 2007. Register-Based Statistics – Administrative Data for Statistical Purposes. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9780470061350
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Willimack, D.K. and G. Snijkers. 2013. “The Business Context and its Implications for the Business Response Process.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 39–82. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9781118447895.ch02
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Ypma, W.F.H., A.J. Willeboordse, and W.J. Keller. 1997, EDI in the collection of statistical data: an introduction. Netherlands Official Statistics (Special issue on EDI: The State of the Dutch Art) 12 (autumn): 7–15. Voorburg/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Zhang. L.-C. 2012. “Topics of Statistical Theory for Register-Based Statistics and Data Integration.” Statistica Neerlandica, 66(1): 41–63. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7367
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 419 - 443
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2016
|
Accepted on: Jan 1, 2018
|
Published on: Jun 7, 2018
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Economic statistics,
business information chain,
reference chart of accounts,
integrated data system,
standardisation, harmonisation,
S2S,
XBRL/SBR
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics

© 2018 Gert Buiten, Ger Snijkers, Paulo Saraiva, Johan Erikson, Anna-Greta Erikson, Alice Born, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 34 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)Next article