Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Data Smearing: An Approach to Disclosure Limitation for Tabular Data

Journal of Official Statistics
Volume 30 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. Cox, L. 1995. “Network Models for Complementary Cell Suppression.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 1453-1462.10.1080/01621459.1995.10476652
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Evans, T., L. Zayatz, and J. Slanta. 1998. “Using Noise for Disclosure Limitation of Establishment Tabular Data.” Journal of Official Statistics 14: 537-551.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Fuller, W. 1993. “Masking Procedures for Microdata Disclosure Limitation.” Journal of Official Statistics 9: 383-406.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Graham, P., J. Young, and R. Penny. 2009. “Multiply Imputed Synthetic Data: Evaluation of Hierarchical Bayesian Imputation Models.” Journal of Official Statistics 25: 245-268.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Holan, S., D. Toth, M. Ferreira, and A. Karr. 2010. “Bayesian Multiscale Multiple Imputation With Implications for Data Confidentiality.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 105: 564-577.10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08629
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Lambert, D. 1993. “Measures of Disclosure Risk and Harm.” Journal of Official Statistics 9: 313-331.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Reiter, J. 2002. “Satisfying Disclosure Restrictions with Synthetic Data Sets.” Journal of Official Statistics 18: 531-544.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Reiter, J. 2004. “New approaches to data dissemination: A glimpse into the future (?).” Chance 17: 12-16.10.1080/09332480.2004.10554907
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Reiter, J. and T. Raghunathan. 2007. “The Multiple Adaptations of Multiple Imputation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 102: 1462-1471.10.1198/016214507000000932
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Rubin, D. 1993. “Discussion: Statistical disclosure limitation.” Journal of Official Statistics 9: 462-468.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Wasserman, L. and S. Zhou. 2010. “A statistical framework for differential privacy.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 105: 375-389.10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08651
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Yang, M., S. Pramanik, A. Mushtaq, F. Scheuren, M. Buso, S. Butani, and D. Hiles. 2012. “Evaluation of Three Disclosure Limitation Models for the QCEW Program.” In Proceedings, Joint Statistical Meeting, American Statistical Association. San Diego, July 28-August 2. 4217-4229.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0050 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7367
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 839 - 857
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2012
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2014
Published on: Dec 11, 2014
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Cell suppression,
contingency tables,
synthetic data,
confidentiality,
multiple imputation,
nearest neighbor
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics

© 2014 Daniell Toth, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 30 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)Next article