Challenges of Academic Ethos: The Scientific Community’s Response to the Ostracism of Russian Scientists Following the Invasion of Ukraine
By:
References
- Buss, D. M. (1990). The Evolution of Anxiety and Social Exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 196–201.
- Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J., & Grigoroudis, E. (2021). Helix Trilogy: The Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Innovation Helices from a Theory, Policy, and Practice Set of Perspectives. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2272–301.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “‘Mode 2’” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123. www.elsevier.nlrlocatereconbase.
- Forsdyke, S. (2000). Exile, Ostracism, and the Athenian Democracy. Classical Antiquity, 19(2), 232–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011121.
- Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.
- Grosskopf, S., & Marmeyer, C. (2021). Learning from Multi-paradigmatic Sensitivity in Cross-cultural Management? Empirical and Theoretical Considerations. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 21(2), 181–202.
- Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), 124–124.
- Jiménez, J. (2008). Research socially responsible: may we speak of a mode 3 knowledge production? RECIIS, 2(1), 48–56.
- Kerr, N. L., & Levine, J. M. (2008). The detection of social exclusion: Evolution and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(1), 39–52.
- Lehman, I., & Krzeszowski, T. (2022). Introducing Reflexivity to Academic Writing in Business and Management. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1, 938–938.
- Merton, R. K. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1(1/2), 115–126.
- Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Napal, G. (2014). The impact of the financial crisis on developing economy: building trust through universalism as opposed to relativism. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 6(2), 142–152.
- Nezlek, J. B., Wesselmann, E. D., Wheeler, L., & Williams, K. D. (2015). Ostracism in Everyday Life: The Effects of Ostracism on Those Who Ostracize. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155(5), 432–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1062351.
- Rotengruber, P. (2017). Słowa i czyny. O społecznej (nie)odpowiedzialności uniwersytetu. Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym, 20(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.1.03.
- Sułkowski, Ł., & Dziedzic, J. (2021). Scientist Organizational Identity Orientations. Economy & Sociology, 14(4), 310–325.
- Szpunar, M. (2018). (In)sensitive culture. Sensitivity in culture. Kultura Współczesna. Teoria, Interpretacje, Praktyka, 4(103).
- Węcowski, M. (2018). Dylemat więźnia: ostracyzm ateński i jego pierwotne cele. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
- Wesselmann, E. D., & Bagg, D., & Williams, K. D. (2009). “I Feel Your Pain”: The effects of observing ostracism on the ostracism detection system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1308–1311.
- Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.
- Williams, K. D. (2009 Ostracism: Effects of being excluded and ignored. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 275–314). Elsevier Academic Press.
- Williams, K. D., & Nida, S. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(2), 71–75.
- Zadro, L. (2004). Ostracism: Empirical Studies Inspired by Real-world Experiences of Silence and Exclusion. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
- Ziman, J. (1996a). Is Science Losing its Objectivity? Nature, 382(6594), 751–754.
- Ziman, J. (1996b). “Postacademic Science”: Constructing Knowledge with Networks and Norms. Science Studies, 9(1), 67–80.
- Ziman, J. (2002). A Response to Reflection on “Real Science: What it is, and What It Means”. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 253–255.
- Ziman, J. (1995). Of One Mind the Collectivization of Science. Springer.
- Ziman, J. (2000). Real Science: What it Is and What it Means. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Language: English
Page range: 147 - 177
Published on: Mar 29, 2024
Published by: SAN University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2024 Justyna Dziedzic, Łukasz Sułkowski, published by SAN University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.