Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Scientist Organizational Identity – the Diversity of Perspectives Cover

Scientist Organizational Identity – the Diversity of Perspectives

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (2004). Organizational Identity. In M.J. Hatch, M. Schultz, Organisational Identity. A Reader. Oxford University Press.
  2. Bascom, W. R. (1948). Ponapean prestige economy. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 4(2), 211–21.10.1086/soutjanth.4.2.3628712
  3. Bhaduri, S. (2013). Scientists’ Motivation to Innovate, Catch Up and Collaborate A transdisciplinary perspective. In. U. Hilpert (Ed.), Handbook of Politics and Technology (pp. 396–408). Abingdon: Routledge.
  4. Brown, R. (2016). Prestige in Academic Life: Excellence and Exclusion. Times Higher Education, 46, 22–64.
  5. Bruton, S. V., Medlin, M., Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2020). Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 531–547.10.1007/s11948-020-00182-9
  6. Büyükgöze, H., & Gün, F. (2017). Building the Professional Identity of Research Assistants: A Phenomenological Research. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17,1 237–63.
  7. Burris, V. (2004). The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in Ph.D. Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 239-64.10.1177/000312240406900205
  8. Child, J., Rodrigues, S. B., Dooley, K. J., & Tsoukasaridimos, H. (2011). How Organizations Engage with External Complexity: A Political Action Perspective. Organization Studies, 32(6), 803-24.10.1177/0170840611410825
  9. Cianciolo, A. T., Mitzelfelt, J., Ghareeb, A., Zahid, M. F., Akbar, R., & Ghias, K. (2020). Physician-scientist or Basic Scientist? Exploring the Nature of Clinicians’ Research Engagement. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 25, August.
  10. Cobern, W., & Loving, C. (2001). Defining “Science” in a Multicultural World: Implications for Science Education. Science Education, 85, 55–56.10.1002/1098-237X(200101)85:1<50::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-G
  11. Grinev, A. V. (2005).The Tlingit Indians in Russian America, 1741–1867. Trans. R. L. Bland & K. G. Solovjova. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  12. Harding, S. (1998).Is Science Multicultural?. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  13. Herskovits, M. J. (1948). Man and his works: The science of cultural anthropology. New York: A.A. Knopf.
  14. Iyer, U. J., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2006). Achievement motivation and performance of scientists in research and development organizations. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 65, March, 187–194.
  15. Johnson, B. B., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2019). Americans’ views of scientists’ motivations for scientific work. Public Understanding of Science, Sage Journals, 2–20.
  16. Kligyte, V., Marcy, R., Waples, E., Sevier, S., Godfrey, E., Mumford, M., & Hougen, D. (2008). Application of a Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training in the Physical Sciences and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 251–278.10.1007/s11948-007-9048-z
  17. Kwiek, M. (2019). Economics of Academic Prestige. Quantitative Inclusion of the Best Journals in the Field of Higher Education Research. Science and Higher Education, 01 December, 1–2, 53–54.
  18. Lam, A. (2015).Academic Scientists and Knowledge Commercialization: Self-Determination and Diverse Motivations. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  19. Leith, P., & Vanclay, F. (2015). Translating Science to Benefit Diverse Publics: Engagement Pathways for Linking Climate Risk, Uncertainty, and Agricultural Identities. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(6), 939–964.10.1177/0162243915577636
  20. Margulies, W. (1977). Make the most of your corporate identity. Harward Bussines Review, July-August.
  21. Martineau, P. (1958). The personality of the retail store. Harvard Business Review, January/ February.
  22. Martin-Rios, C. (2016). Sensemaking of Organizational Innovation and Change in Public Research Organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 24(3), 516–31.10.1108/IJOA-07-2014-0784
  23. Mead, G.H. (1975).Mind, personality, society, Warsaw: PWN.
  24. Myung-Hui, K., Suk Bong, C., & Seung-Wan, K. (2017).Women Scientists’ Workplace and Parenting Role Identities: A Polynomial Analysis of Congruence. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(1), 29–38.10.2224/sbp.5699
  25. Nunnally, S. C. (2019).The National Conference of Black Political Scientists (NCOBPS): Organizational Empowerment Through Signaling and Valuing Women and Diversity During #MeToo, 22, March.10.1201/9781003014508-16
  26. Ommering, B. W. C, van Blankenstein, F. M., Wijnen-Meijer, M., van Diepen, M., & Dekker, F. W. (2019).Fostering the physician-scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement. BMJ Open, 20 July, 9(7).10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028034
  27. Leith, P., & Vanclay, F. (2015). Translating Science to Benefit Diverse Publics: Engagement Pathways for Linking Climate Risk, Uncertainty, and Agricultural Identities. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(6), 939–964.10.1177/0162243915577636
  28. Pekdoğan, S. (2019). I Can Draw a Scientist Whom I Imagined. NeuroQuantology 17(3), 1–8.10.14704/nq.2019.17.3.1932
  29. Ryan, J. C. (2014). The Work Motivation of Research Scientists and Its Effect on Research Performance. R&D Management, 44(4), 355-69.10.1111/radm.12063
  30. Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Audit Culture Revisited. Rankings, Ratings, and the Reassembling of Society. Current Anthropology, 56(3), 421–444.10.1086/681534
  31. Stallings, D., Iyer, S. K., & Hernandez, R. (2013). National Diversity Equity Workshop-Focus on Gender Identity and Orientation in Chemistry Faculties. ACS Symposium Series, 2018, 12(77), 51–77.
  32. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W.G. Austin, & S. Worchel, The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Tan, M., Herberg, J. S., Samarasekera, D., & Chen, Zhi Xiong (2020). Understanding factors that motivate research performance and career longevity of science, technology, engineering and mathematics postgraduates. Asia Pacific Scholar, 01 January, Vol. 5(1), 25–45.10.29060/TAPS.2020-5-1/OA2073
  34. Turney, J. (1996). Public Understanding of Science. The Lancet (British Edition) 347.9008, 1087–09010.1016/S0140-6736(96)90283-4
  35. Sułkowski, Ł. (2008). Czy warto zajmować się kulturą organizacyjną. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 6, 9–25.
  36. Sułkowski, Ł. (2012).Cultural management processes. Warsaw: Diffin.
  37. Sułkowski, Ł. (2013a). Kultura jakości w zarządzaniu, czyli pomiędzy tożsamością a kulturą organizacyjną. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, XIV, 8, II, 25–37.
  38. Sułkowski, Ł. (2013b). Transformacje kulturowe współczesnych uczelni wyższych. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie. XIV, 12, I, 23–31.
  39. Sułkowski, Ł. (2014). Który model uniwersytetu?. Przeglad Socjologiczny, 63(3), 67–70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2020-0049 | Journal eISSN: 2543-831X | Journal ISSN: 2080-0150
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 48
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
Published by: SAN University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Łukasz Sułkowski, Justyna Dziedzic, published by SAN University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.