![The Influence of Cowpea Cultivar on the Host Preferences of Cowpea Bruchids [Callosobruchus maculatus (F.)] Cover](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/686495f6e88a4c302353cb8a/cover-image.jpg)
References
- Abd El-Ghany N.M. 2019. Semiochemicals for controlling insect pests. Journal of Plant Protection Research 59(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.24425/jppr.2019.126036.
- Adhikary P., Mukherjee A., Barik, A. 2015. Attraction of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchi-dae) to four varieties of Lathyrus sativus L. seed vol-atiles. Bulletin of Entomological Research 105(2): 187–201. DOI: 10.1017/s000748531400087x.
- Agelopoulos N., Birkett M.A., Hick A.J., Hooper A.M., Pickett J.A., Pow E.M. et al. 1999. Exploiting sem-iochemicals in insect control. Pesticide Science 55(3): 225–235. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9063(199903)55:3<;225::aid-ps887>3.3.co;2-z.
- Ahuchaogu C.E., Ojiako F.O. 2020. Attraction of Callo-sobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) to pods of cowpea plants at different developmental stages. Agro-Sci-ence 19(3): 32–39. DOI: 10.4314/as.v19i3.6.
- Ajayi O.E., Balusu R., Morawo T.O., Zebelo S., Fa-damiro H. 2015. Semiochemical modulation of host preference of Callosobruchus maculatus on legume seeds. Journal of Stored Products Research 63: 31–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2015.05.003.
- Ajayi O.E., Morawo T.O., Fadamiro H.Y. 2018. Preference of flight morph of Callosobruchus maculatus (Cole-optera: Chrysomelidae) for three plant legumes. In-ternational Journal of Tropical Insect Science 38(4): 362–372. DOI: 10.1017/s1742758418000152.
- Anukiruthika T., Jian F., Jayas D.S. 2021. Movement and behavioral response of stored product insects under stored grain environments – A review. Journal of Stored Products Research 90: 101752. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101752.
- Arnold S.E.J., Stevenson P.C., Belmain S.R. 2012. Odour-mediated orientation of beetles is influenced by age, sex and morph. PloS ONE 7(11); e49071; 7 p. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049071.
- Arong G.A., Usua E.J. 2006. Comparative development of cowpea bruchid, (Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on pods and seeds of some cowpea cultivars (Vigna unguiculata). Global Jour-nal of Pure and Applied Sciences 12(1): 35–40. DOI: 10.4314/gjpas.v12i1.16545.
- Arotolu T.E., Adeyemi J.A., Adedire C.O. 2018. Influ-ence of intrinsic factors of cowpea seed varieties on the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Crop Pro-tection 7(2): 219–229.
- Baidoo P.K., Kwansa N.A., Annin C.P. 2015. The role of seed coat and its pigmentation on the acceptance of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.) cultivars by the cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Advances in Entomology 3(4): 125–131. DOI: 10.4236/ae.2015.34015.
- Beck J.J., Light D.M., Gee W.S. 2012. Electroanten-nographic bioassay as a screening tool for host plant volatiles. Journal of Visualized Experiments 63; e3931; 9 p. DOI: 10.3791/3931.
- Beck C.W., Blumer L.S. 2014. A handbook on bean bee-tles, Callosobruchus maculatus developing bean beetles as a model system for undergraduate labor-atories. National Science Foundation, USA 14 p.
- Boukar O., Abberton M., Oyatomi O., Togola A., Tripathi L., Fatokun C. 2020. Introgression breeding in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Frontiers in Plant Sci-ence 11; 567425; 11 p. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.567425.
- Hamzavi F., Naseri B., Hassanpour M., Razmjou J., Goliza-deh A. 2022. Biology and life table parameters of Cal-losobruchus maculatus (F.) on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. fertilized with some mineral- and bio-fertilizers. Journal of Stored Products Research 97; 101978; 8 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2022.101978.
- Huff R.M., Pitts R.J. 2019. An odorant receptor from Anopheles gambiae that demonstrates enantiose-lectivity to the plant volatile, linalool. PLoS ONE 14(11); e0225637; 15 p. DOI: 10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0225637.
- Jacob K.N., Koutoua A., Casimir K.A., Denise B.M.A., Gogbeu S.J., Charlotte T.D. 2016. Agronomic and biochemical evaluation of some ecotypes of cow-pea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. (Fabaceae)] col-lected in Côte d’Ivoire. Scholars Journal of Agri-culture and Veterinary Sciences 3(4): 292–297. DOI: 10.21276/sjavs.2016.3.4.4.
- Kalpna, Hajam Y.A., Kumar R. 2022. Management of stored grain pest with special reference to Callosobruchus mac-ulatus, a major pest of cowpea: A review. Heliyon 8(1); e08703; 12 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08703.
- Kosini D., Nukenine E.N., Saidou C., Noubissié J., Doli-nassou S. 2019. Impact of environmental conditions and seed physico-chemical characteristics on the resistance of cowpea genotypes to Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) infesta-tion. Bulletin of Entomological Research 109(5): 595–603. DOI: 10.1017/s0007485318000962.
- Kpoviessi A.D., Agbahoungba S., Agoyi E.E., Chougourou D.C., Assogbadjo A.E. 2019. Resistance of cowpea to cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus Fab.): Knowledge level on the genetic advances. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 11(8): 185–195. DOI: 10.5897/jpbcs2019.0818.
- Li P., Zhu J., Qin Y. 2012. Enhanced attraction of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to pheromone-baited traps with the addition of green leaf volatiles. Journal of Economic Entomology 105(4): 1149–1156. DOI: 10.1603/ec11109.
- Magagula C.N., Maina Y.T. 2012. Activity of Callo-sobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on selected Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.) landraces and breeding lines. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 2(3): 84–91.
- Musa A.K., Adeboye A.A. 2017. Susceptibility of some cowpea varieties to the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Jour-nal of Agricultural Sciences 62(4): 351–360. DOI: 10.2298/jas1704351m.
- Nojima S., Shimomura K., Honda H., Yamamoto I., Ohsawa K. 2007. Contact sex pheromone compo-nents of the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus macu-latus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33(5): 923–933. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-007-9266-5.
- Nyarko J., Asare A.T., Mensah B.A., Adjei F. 2022. Assess-ment of the response of fifteen cowpea [Vigna un-guiculata L. (Walp.)] genotypes to infestation by Cal-losobruchus maculatus Fab. (Coloeptera: Bruchidae). Cogent Food and Agriculture 8(1); 2095713; 11 p. DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2022.2095713.
- Osei-Owusu J., Vuts J., Caulfield J.C., Woodcock C.M., Withall D.M., Hooper A.M. et al. 2020. Identifica-tion of semiochemicals from cowpea, Vigna unguic-ulata, for low-input management of the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata. Journal of Chemical Ecology 46(3): 288–298. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-020-01149-7.
- Oyeniyi E.A., Adegoke Y.A. 2024. Evaluating the effect of cowpea variety on the insecticidal response and anti-oxidant enzymes of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab-ricius) treated with two plant powders. Plant Protec-tion 8(1): 87–100. DOI: 10.33804/pp.008.01.5057.
- Oyeniyi E.A., Gbaye O.A., Holloway G.J. 2015a. Inter-active effect of cowpea variety, dose and exposure time on bruchid tolerance to botanical pesticides. African Crop Science Journal 23(2): 165–175.
- Oyeniyi E.A., Gbaye O.A., Holloway G.J. 2015b. The in-fluence of geographic origin and food type on the susceptibility of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab-ricius) to Piper guineense (Schum and Thonn). Journal of Stored Product Research 63: 15–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2015.05.005.
- Oyeniyi E.A., Adeyemi J.A., Omotoso O.T. 2021. The in-teraction between strain and food type influences biological parameters of Tribolium castaneum and its susceptibility to Dennettia tripetala extract. En-tomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 169(10): 899–910. DOI: 10.1111/eea.13064.
- Oyeniyi E.A., Omotoso O.T., Barbosa F. Jr., Adeyemi J.A. 2024. Adult food and species type influence the nu-tritional physiology and tolerance of two flour bee-tles to the extract of Dennettia tripetala (G. Baker). Physiological Entomology 49(3): 253–269. DOI: 10.1111/phen.12442.
- Paparella A., Shaltiel-Harpaza L., Ibdah M. 2021. β‐Io-none: its occurrence and biological function and metabolic engineering. Plants 10(4); 754; 12 p. DOI: 10.3390/plants10040754.
- Phillips T.W. 1997. Semiochemicals of stored-product insects: Research and applications. Journal of Stored Products Research 33(1): 17–30. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-474x(96)00039-2.
- Saeidi K., Adam N.A. 2011. Efficiency of methyl eugenol as attractant for Acanthiophilus helianthi Rossi, 1794 (Diptera: Tephritidae). International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science 1(10): 412–416.
- Salamanca J., Souza B., Kyryczenko-Roth V., Rodri-guez-Saona C. 2019. Methyl salicylate increases at-traction and function of beneficial arthropods in cranberries. Insects 10(12); 423; 15 p. DOI: 10.3390/insects10120423.
- Sharma A., Sandhi R.K., Reddy G.V.P. 2019. A review of interactions between insect biological control agents and semiochemicals. Insects 10(12); 439; 16 p. DOI: 10.3390/insects10120439.
- Tamiru A., Bruce T.J.A., Woodcock C.M., Birkett M.A., Midega C.A.O., Pickett J.A., Khan Z.R. 2015. Chemical cues modulating electrophysiological and behavioural responses in the parasitic wasp Cotesia sesamiae. Canadian Journal of Zoology 93(4): 281–287. DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2014-0266.
- Tewari H., Jyothi K.N., Kasana V.K., Prasad A.R., Prasuna A.L. 2015. Insect attractant and oviposition enhancing activity of hexadecanoic acid ester de-rivatives for monitoring and trapping Caryedon serratus. Journal of Stored Products Research 61: 32–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2015.02.003.
- Tiroesele B., Thomas K., Seketeme S. 2015. Control of Cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), using natural plant products. Insects 6(1): 77–84. DOI: 10.3390/insects6010077.
- Tobing M.C., Sinaga S.C.T., Bintang, Widihastuty, Pra-mayudi N. 2022. The used of attractants from coffee at various heights traps to control coffee berry borer and quality test of coffee berry. IOP Conference Se-ries: Earth and Environmental Science 974; 012024; 9 p. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/974/1/012024.
- Togola A., Boukar O., Belko N., Chamarthi S.K., Fato-kun C., Tamo M., Oigiangbe N. 2017. Host plant resistance to insect pests of cowpea (Vigna un-guiculata L. Walp.): achievements and future pro-spects. Euphytica 213(11); 239; 16 p. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-017-2030-1.
- War A.R., Murugesan S., Boddepalli V.N., Srinivasan R., Nair R.M. 2017. Mechanism of resistance in mung-bean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek var. radiata] to bruchids, Callosobruchus spp. (Coleoptera: Bruchi-dae). Frontiers in Plant Science 8; 1031; 11 p. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01031.
- Webster B., Bruce T., Dufour S., Birkemeyer C., Birkett M., Hardie J., Pickett J. 2008. Identification of volatile compounds used in host location by the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 34(9): 1153–1161. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-008-9510-7.