Site-Directed Mutagenesis – A Chance to Meet Environmental Challenges and Provide Healthy Food for People or an Unacceptable Hazard to Humans, Animals, and the Environment. Consequences of the European Court of Justice Judgment in Case C-528/16

Michalczuk, Lech

doi:10.2478/johr-2022-0012

References

Adaskaveg J.A., Silva C.J., Huang P., Blanco-Ulate B. 2021. Single and double mutations in tomato ripening transcription factors have distinct effects on fruit development and quality traits. Frontiers in Plant Science 12; 647035; 17 p. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.647035.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Aramrak A., Lawrence N.C., Demacon V.L., Carter A.H., Kidwell K.K., Burke I.C., Steber C. M. 2018. Isolation of mutations conferring increased glyphosate resistance in spring wheat. Crop Science 58(1): 84–97. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2016.10.0861.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Argast G.M., Stephens K.M., Emond M.J., Monnat R.J. Jr. 1998. I-PpoI and I-CreI homing site sequence degeneracy determined by random mutagenesis and sequential in vitro enrichment. Journal of Molecular Biology 280(3): 345–353. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1886.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barrangou R. 2015. The roles of CRISPR–Cas systems in adaptive immunity and beyond. Current Opinion in Immunology 32: 36–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.12.008.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barreiro-Hurle J., Bogonos M., Himics M., Hristov J., Pérez-Domínguez I., Sahoo A. et al. 2021. Modelling environmental and climate ambition in the agricultural sector with the CAPRI model. JCR Technical Report. EUR 30317 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. DOI: 10.2760/98160.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beckman J., Ivanic M., Jelliffe J.L., Baquedano F.G., Scott S.G. 2020. Economic and food security impacts of agricultural input reduction under the European Union Green Deal's Farm to Fork and Bio-diversity Strategies. EB-30, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 52 p. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/99741/eb-30.pdf?v=4469.8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beyaz R., Yildiz M. 2017. The use of gamma irradiation in plant mutation breeding. In: Jurić S. (Ed.), Plant Engineering. InTech, Croatia, pp. 33–46. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69974.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boch J. 2011. TALEs of genome targeting. Nature Biotechnology 29(2): 135–136. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1767.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bremmer J., Gonzalez-Martinez A., Jongeneel R., Huiting H., Stokkers R., Ruijs M. 2021. Impact assessment of EC 2030 Green Deal targets for sustainable crop production. The Netherlands, Wageningen Economic Research, Report 2021–150, 70 p. DOI: 10.18174/558517.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chagné D. 2015. Whole genome sequencing of fruit tree species. Advances in Botanical Research 74: 1–37. DOI: 10.1016/bs.abr.2015.04.004.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen J-T., Coate J.E., Meru G. 2020. Editorial: Artificial polyploidy in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 11; 621849; 3 p. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.621849.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CJEU 2018. EU:C:2018:583, Case C-528/16. Judgement of 25 July 2018. Court of Justice of the European Union. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?mode=DOC&pageIndex=0&docid=204387
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Curtin S.J., Zhang F, Sander J.D., Haun W.J., Starker C., Baltes N.J. et al. 2011. Targeted mutagenesis of duplicated genes in soybean with zinc-finger nucleases. Plant Physiology 156(2): 466–473. DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.172981.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Darwin C. 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. John Murray, London, UK. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511709500.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drake J.W., Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D., Crow J.F. 1998. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148(4): 1667–1686. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EC 2020a. A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2020) 381 final, 19 p. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0381
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EC 2020b. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2020) 380 final, 22 p. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/bio-diversity/strategy/index_en.htm
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EC 2021. Study on the status of new genomic techniques under Union law and in light of the Court of Justice ruling in Case C-528/16. Commission Staff Working Document. European Commission. SWD(2021) 92 final, 116 p. https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-04/gmo_mod-bio_ngt_eu-study.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EFSA 2020. Applicability of the EFSA Opinion on site-directed nucleases type 3 for the safety assessment of plants developed using site-directed nucleases type 1 and 2 and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms. EFSA Journal 18(11); e06299; 14 p. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6299.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fluhr R., Aviv D., Galun E., Edelman M. 1985. Efficient induction and selection of chloroplast-encoded antibiotic-resistant mutants in Nicotiana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 82(5): 1485–1489. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.5.1485.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gaudelli N.M., Komor A.C., Rees H.A., Packer M.S., Badran A.H., Bryson D.I., Liu D.R. 2017. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551(7681): 464–471. DOI: 10.1038/nature24644.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Granhall I. 1954. Spontaneous and induced bud mutations in fruit trees. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 4(1): 594–600. DOI: 10.1080/00015125409439967.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hanna R.E., Doench J.G. 2020. Design and analysis of CRISPR–Cas experiments. Nature Biotechnology 38(7): 813–823. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0490-7.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Henning C., Witzke P., Panknin L., Grunenberg M. 2021. Ökonomische und Ökologische Auswirkungen des Green Deals in der Agrarwirtschaf. Department of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Policy, Kiel University, Germany, 238 p. [in German] https://www.bio-pop.agrarpol.uni-kiel.de/de/f2f-studie/vollversion-der-studie-deutsch
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hutchison C.A., Phillips S., Edgell M.H., Gillam S., Jahnke P., Smith M. 1978. Mutagenesis at a specific position in a DNA sequence. Journal of Biological Chemistry 253(18): 6551–6560. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)46967-6.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Illa E., Eduardo I., Audergon J.M., Barale F., Dirlewanger E., Li X. et al. 2011. Saturating the Prunus (stone fruits) genome with candidate genes for fruit quality. Molecular Breeding 28(4): 667–682. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-010-9518-x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaganathan D., Ramasamy K., Sellamuthu G., Jayabalan S., Venkataraman G. 2018. CRISPR for crop improvement: An update review. Frontiers in Plant Science 9; 985; 17 p. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00985.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Janick J. 2011. History of fruit breeding. Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology 5(Special Issue 1): 1–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jinek M., Chylinski K., Fonfara I., Hauer M., Doudna J.A., Charpentier E. 2012. A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337(6096): 816–821. DOI: 10.1126/science.1225829.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karavolias N.G., Horner W., Abugu M.N., Evanega S.N. 2021. Application of gene editing for climate change in agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5; 685801; 23 p. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.685801.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kharkwal M.C. 2012. A brief history of plant mutagenesis. In: Shu Q.Y., Forster B.P., Nakagawa H. (Eds.), Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. CABI, pp. 21–30. DOI: 10.1079/9781780640853.0021.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kim Y.-G., Cha J., Chandrasegaran S. 1996. Hybrid restriction enzymes: Zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93(3): 1156–1160. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1156.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kleinstiver B.P., Prew M.S., Tsai S.Q., Nguyen N.T., Topkar V.V., Zheng Z., Joung J.K. 2015. Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition. Nature Biotechnology 33(12): 1293–1298. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3404.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Komor A.C., Kim Y.B., Packer M.S., Zuris J.A., Liu D.R. 2016. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533(7603): 420–424. DOI: 10.1038/nature17946.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leitao J. 2012. Chemical mutagenesis. In: Shu Q.Y., Forster B.P., Nakagawa H. (Eds.), Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. CABI, pp. 135–158. DOI: 10.1079/9781780640853.0135.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu Q., Yang F., Zhang J., Liu H., Rahman S., Islam S. et al. 2021. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in crop quality improvement. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22(8); 4206; 16 p. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22084206.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Modrzejewski D., Hartung F., Sprink T., Krause D., Kohl C., Wilhelm R. 2019. What is the available evidence for the range of applications of genome-editing as a new tool for plant trait modification and the potential occurrence of associated off-target effects: a systematic map. Environmental Evidence 8; 27; 33 p. DOI: 10.1186/s13750-019-0171-5.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nakamura M., Nunoshiba T., Hiratsu K. 2021. Detection and analysis of UV-induced mutations in the chromosomal DNA of Arabidopsis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 554: 89–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.03.087.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oladosu Y., Rafii M.Y., Abdullah N., Hussin G., Ramli A., Rahim H.A. et al. 2016. Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: a review. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment 30(1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2015.1087333.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oldach K.H. 2011. Mutagenesis. In: Pratap A., Kumar J. (Eds.), Biology and breeding of food legumes. CABI, pp. 208–219. DOI: 10.1079/9781845937669.0208.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Osakabe Y., Osakabe K. 2015. Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants. Plant and Cell Physiology 56(3): 389–400. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu170.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Owais W.M., Kleinhofs A. 1988. Metabolic activation of the mutagen azide in biological systems. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 197(2): 313–323. DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(88)90101-7.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pathirana R. 2011. Plant mutation breeding in agriculture. Plant Sciences Reviews 2011. CAB Reviews 6(32): 107–126. DOI: 10.1079/pavsnnr20116032.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Puchta H., Dujon B., Hohn B. 1993. Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strand breaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Research 21(22): 5034–5040. DOI: 10.1093/nar/21.22.5034.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ramirez-Torres F., Ghogare R., Stowe E., Cerdá-Bennasser P., Lobato-Gómez M., Williamson-Benavides B.A. et al. 2021. Genome editing in fruit, ornamental, and industrial crops. Transgenic Research 30(4): 499–528. DOI: 10.1007/s11248-021-00240-3.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ryczek N., Hryhorowicz M., Zeyland J., Lipiński D., Słomski R. 2021. CRISPR/Cas technology in pig-to-human xenotransplantation research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22(6); 3196; 22 p. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22063196.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sanada T., Amano E. 1998. Induced mutation in fruit trees. In: Jain S.M., Brar D.S., Ahloowalia B.S. (Eds.), Somaclonal variation and induced mutations in crop improvement. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture 32: 401–419. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9125-6_20.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sattar M.N., Iqbal Z., Al-Khayri J.M., Jain S.M. 2021. Induced genetic variations in fruit trees using new breeding tools: Food security and climate resilience. Plants 10(7); 1347; 36 p. DOI: 10.3390/plants10071347.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sattler M.C., Carvalho C.R., Clarindo W.R. 2016. The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 243(2): 281–296. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-015-2450-x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scott A. 2018. How CRISPR is transforming drug discovery. Nature 555(7695): S10–S11. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-02477-1.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sikora P., Chawade A., Larsson M., Olsson J., Olsson O. 2011. Mutagenesis as a tool in plant genetics, functional genomics, and breeding. International Journal of Plant Genomics 2011; 314829; 13 p. DOI: 10.1155/2011/314829.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith J., Grizot S., Arnould S., Duclert A., Epinat J.-C., Chames P. et al. 2006. A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 34(22); e149; 12 p. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl720.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stadler L.J. 1928. Genetic effects of X-rays in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 14(1): 69–75. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.14.1.69.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sussman D., Chadsey M., Fauce S., Engel A., Bruett A., Monnat R. Jr. et al. 2004. Isolation and characterization of new homing endonuclease specificities at individual target site positions. Journal of Molecular Biology 342(1): 31–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.031.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stemple D.L. 2004. TILLING – a high-throughput harvest for functional genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 5(2): 145–150. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1273.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Troggio M., Gleave A., Salvi S., Chagné D., Cestaro A., Kumar S. et al. 2012. Apple, from genome to breeding. Tree Genetics and Genomes 8(3): 509–529. DOI: 10.1007/s11295-012-0492-9.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vivian A., Arnold D.L. 2000. Bacterial effector genes and their role in host-pathogen interactions. Journal of Plant Pathology 82(3): 163–178.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de Vries H. 1906. Species and varieties. Their origin by mutation. Open Court Publishing Company, London, UK. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.4640.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Watanabe H. 2001. Significance and expectations of ion beam breeding. Gamma Field Symposia 40: 15–19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolters P.J., Schouten H.J., Velasco R., Si-Ammour A., Baldi P. 2013. Evidence for regulation of columnar habit in apple by a putative 2OG-Fe(II) oxygenase. New Phytologist 200(4): 993–939. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12580.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yoshioka T., Masuda T., Kotobuki K., Sanada T., Ito Y. 1999. Gamma-ray-induced mutation breeding in fruit trees: Breeding of mutant cultivars resistant to black spot disease in Japanese pear. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 33(4): 227–234.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang B. 2021. CRISPR/Cas gene therapy. Journal of Cellular Physiology 236(4): 2459–2481. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.30064.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang F., Maeder M.L., Unger-Wallace E., Hoshaw J.P., Reyon D., Christian M. et al. 2010. High frequency targeted mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using zinc finger nucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(26): 12028–12033. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0914991107.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang M.Y., Xue C., Hu H., Li J., Xue Y., Wang R. et al. 2021. Genome-wide association studies provide insights into the genetic determination of fruit traits of pear. Nature Communications 12; 1144; 10 p. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21378-y.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhao Z., Li C., Tong F., Deng J., Huang G., Sang Y. 2021. Review of applications of CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology in cancer research. Biological Procedures Online 23; 14; 13 p. DOI: 10.1186/s12575-021-00151-x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhu B., Wang D., Wei N. 2022. Enzyme discovery and engineering for sustainable plastic recycling. Trends in Biotechnology 40(1): 22–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.02.008.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zimmermann F.K. 1977. Genetic effects of nitrous acids. Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology 39(2): 127–148. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(77)90019-7.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Site-Directed Mutagenesis – A Chance to Meet Environmental Challenges and Provide Healthy Food for People or an Unacceptable Hazard to Humans, Animals, and the Environment. Consequences of the European Court of Justice Judgment in Case C-528/16

References

Paradigm

My account