Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
In Vitro Propagation Of ‘Gisela 5’ Rootstock As Affected By Mineral Composition Of Media And Plant Growth Regulators Cover

In Vitro Propagation Of ‘Gisela 5’ Rootstock As Affected By Mineral Composition Of Media And Plant Growth Regulators

Journal of Horticultural Research
Volume 23 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Sep 2015
References

References

  1. Augusto C.S.S. 2001. Micropropagação de amoreirapreta cv. Brazos. Dissertação, Mestrado em Produção Vegetal, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil 30: 266-270.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bošnjak A.M., Kereša S., Jerčić I.H., Barić M. 2012. The effect of cytokinin type and explant orientation on axillary shoot proliferation androoting of ‘Gisela 5’ cherry rootstock. Journal: Food, Agriculture and Environment 10(3&4): 616-620.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Clapa D., Fira A., Joshee N. 2013. An efficientrooting and acclimatization method for horticultural plants using float hydroculture. HortScience 48(9): 1159-1167.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Dimassi-Theriou K. 1995.rooting of rootstock GF 677 () as influenced by mineral concentration of the nutrient medium and type of culture-tube sealing material. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 70(1):105-108.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Dorić D., Ognjanov V., Ljubojević, M., Barać G., Dulić J., Pranjić A., Dugalić K. 2014. Rapid propagation of sweet and sour cherry rootstock. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 42(2): 488-494. DOI: 10.15835/nbha.42.2.9671.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Driver J.A., Kuniyuki A.H. 1984.propagation of Paradox walnut×rootstock. HortScience 19: 507-509.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Driver J.A., Suttle G.R. 1987. Nursery handling of propagules. In: Bonga J.M. et al. (Eds.), Cell and tissue culture in forestry. Forestry Sciences, vol. 24-26, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 320-335. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-4484-8_17.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Drkenda P., Spahić A., Spahić A., Begić-Akagić A. 2012. Testing of ‘Gisela 5’ and ‘Santa Lucia 64’ cherry rootstocks in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 99(2): 129-136. DOI: 10.2478/v10014-012-0012-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Erwin D.C., Ribeiro O.K. 1996. Phytophthora diseases worldwide. APS Press, American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA. pp. 562.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Exadaktylou E., Thomidis T., Grout B., Zakynthinos G., Tsipouridis C. 2009. Methods to improve the rooting of hardwood cuttings of the ‘Gisela 5’ cherry rootstock. HortTechnology 19(2): 254-259.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Fenn L.B., Feagley S. 1999. Review of beneficial uses of calcium and ammonium salts for stimulating plant growth and metabolite translocation. Soil Science and Plant Analysis 30(19-20): 2627-2641. DOI: 10.1080/00103629909370401.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Fotopoulos S., Sotiropoulos T.E. 2005.propagation of the PR 204/84 () rootstock: Axillary shoot production and rhizogenesis. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 33(1): 75-79. DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2005.9514333.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Glass A.D.M., Britto D.T., Kaiser B.N., Kinghorn J.R., Kronzucker H.J., Kumar A., et al. 2002. The regulation of nitrate and ammonium transport systems in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 53(370):855-864. DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/53.370.855.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Hirschi K.D. 2004. The calcium conundrum. Both versatile nutrient and specific signal. Plant Physiology 136(1): 2438-2442. DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.046490.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Lambardi M., Roncasaglia R., Previati A., De Carlo A., Dradi G., Da Re F., Calamai L. 2006.slow growth storage of fruit rootstocks inside gas-tight or gas-permeable containers. Acta Horticulturae 725: 483-488. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.725.69.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Lloyd G., McCown B. 1980. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel,by use shoot-tip culture. International Plant Propagators’ Society 30: 421-427.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Long L.E. 2003. Cherry training systems, selection and development. PNW 543, Corvallis, Oregon State University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Long L.E., Kaiser C. 2010. Sweet cherry rootstocks for the Pacific Northwest. A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication, PNW 619, Oregon State University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Mansseri-Lamrioui A., Louerguioui A., Bonaly J., Yakoub-Bougdal S., Allili N., Gana-Kebbouche S. 2011. Proliferation and rooting of wild cherry: The influence of cytokinin and auxin types and their concentration. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(43): 8613-8624. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.450.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiologia Plantarum 15(3): 473-497.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Nacheva L., Gercheva P. 2009. Micropropagation of ‘Gisela 5’ (cherry dwarf rootstock): The effect of the type and the concentration of the carbohydrates in the nutrient medium. Acta Horticulturae 825: 261-267. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.825.41.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Pierik R.L.M. 1997.culture of higher plants. Springer Science and Business Media, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5750-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Quoirin M., Lepoivre P. 1977. Edude de milieu adaptes aux culturesde prunus. Acta Horticulturae 78: 437-442 (in French).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Reddy A.S.N. 2001. Calcium: Silver bullet in signaling. Plant Science 160(3): 381-404. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00386-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Ružić D., Sarić M., Cerović R., Ćulafić L. 2000. Relationship between the concentration of macro-elements, their uptake and multiplication of cherry rootstock ‘Gisela 5’. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 63(1): 9-14. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006412901992.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Ružić D.V., Vujović T.I. 2008. The effects of cytokinin types and their concentration onmultiplication of sweet cherry cv. ‘Lapins’ (L.). HortScience. 35: 12-21.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Sarropoulou V., Dimassi-Theriou K., Therios I. 2013.rooting and biochemical parameters in the cherry rootstocks CAB-6P and ‘Gisela 6’ using L-methionine. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 37(6): 688-698. DOI: 10.3906/tar-1212-81.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Šiško M. 2011.propagation of ‘Gisela 5’ (s ×). Agricultura 8(1): 31-34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Zimmermann A. 1994. ‘Gisela 5’, a dwarfing rootstock for sweet cherries from Giessen in a trial. Obstbau (Germany) 19: 62-63.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2015-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 (formerly 2300-5009) | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 57 - 64
Submitted on: Apr 1, 2015
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2015
Published on: Sep 23, 2015
Published by: National Institute of Horticultural Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
‘Gisela 5’ rootstock,
media,
proliferation,
rooting
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Biotechnology,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2015 Maliheh Fallahpour, Seied Mehdi Miri, Naser Bouzari, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 23 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
Previous article
Next article