Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Impact of the Brassicaceae Plant Materials Added to the Soil on the Population of FUSARIUM SOLANI (Mart.) SACC. and FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM Schlecht Cover

The Impact of the Brassicaceae Plant Materials Added to the Soil on the Population of FUSARIUM SOLANI (Mart.) SACC. and FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM Schlecht

Journal of Horticultural Research
Volume 22 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2014
References

References

  1. Bohinc T., Ban S.G., Ban D., Trdan S. 2012. Glu-cosinolates in plant protection strategies: a re–view. Arch. Biol. Sci. 64: 821-828. DOI: 10.2298/ABS1203821B.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Bonanomi G., Antignani V., Pane C., Scala F. 2007. Suppression of soilborne fungal diseases with or–ganic amendments. J. Plant Pathol. 89: 311-324.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Borneman J., Becker J.O. 2007. Identifying macroor-ganisms involved in specific pathogen suppression in soil. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 45: 153-172.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Brown P.D., Morra M.J. 1997. Control of soil-borne plant pests using glucosinolate-containing plants. Adv. Agron. 61: 167-231.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Burgieł Z.J. 2005. Research on possibilities of utiliza–tion of chosen Brassicaceae plants in protection of cucumber against damping-off caused by Rhi-zoctonia solani Kühn and(W.G. Smith) Sacc. Acta Agrobot. 58: 171-178. [in Polish with English abstract]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Cao A.C., Zhang W.J., Liu J.H. 2007. Progress in the alternatives to methyl bromide in soil disinfes-tations. Plant. Prot. 33: 15-18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2007.01.005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Chung W.C., Huang J.W., Huang H.C., Jen J.F. 2002. Effect of groundseed meal on control ofdamping-off of cabbage. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 24: 211-218.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Chung W.C., Huang J., Jen J. 2003. Control byseed pomace combined withdamping-off of watermelon caused bysp. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 25: 285-294.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Couteaudier Y., Alabouvette C. 1990. Survival and in–oculums potential of conidia and chlamydospores off.sp.in soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 36: 551-556.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. De Cal A., Pascual S., Melgarejo P. 1997. Infectivity of chlamydospores vs microconidia off.sp.on tomato. J. Phytopathol. 145: 231-233.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Duniway J. 2002. Status of chemical alternatives to me–thyl bromide for pre-plant fumigation of soil. Phy–topathology 92: 1337-1343.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Gamliel A., Austerweil M., Kritzman G. 2000. Non-chemical approach to soilborne pest management - organic amendments. Crop Prot. 19: 847-853.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Gimsing A., Kirkegaard J. 2009. Glucosinolates and bio-fumigation: fate of glucosinolates and their hydrol–ysis products in soil. Phytochem. Rev. 8: 299-310.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Kirkegaard J., Sarwar M. 1998. Biofumigation potential of brassicas. Plant Soil 201: 71-89.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Klein E., Katan J., Gamliel A. 2011. Soil suppressive-ness todisease following organic amendments and solarization. Plant Dis. 95: 1116–1123. DOI:10.1094/PDIS-01-11-0065.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Komada H. 1975. Development of selective medium for quantitative isolation offrom natural soil. Rev. Plant Prot. Res. 8: 114-125.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Matthiessen J.N., Kirkegaard J.A. 2006. Biofumigation and enhanced biodegradation: opportunity and challenge in soilborne pest and disease manage–ment. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 25: 235-265.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Mayton H.S., Olivier C., Vaughn S.F., Loria R. 1996. Correlation of fungicidal activity ofspe–cies with allyl isothiocyanate production in mace–rated leaf tissue. Phytopathology 86: 267-271.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Mazzola M., Granatstein D.M., Elfving D.C., Mullinix K. 2001. Suppression of specific apple root patho–gens byseed meal amendment re–gardless of glucosinolate content. Phytopathology 91: 673-679.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Motisi N., Poggi S., Filipe J.A.N., Lucas P., Dor é T., Montfort F., Gilligan C.A., Bailey D.J. 2013. Epidemiological analysis of the effects of bio–fumigation for biological control of root rot in sugar beet. Plant Pathol. 62: 69-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02618.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Lopez-Escudero F.J., Mwanza C., Blanco-Lopez M.A. 2007. Reduction ofmicro-sclerotia viability in soil by dried plant resi–dues. Crop Prot. 26: 127-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2006.04.011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Piekarska A., Bartoszek A., Namieśnik J. 2010. Biofu–migation as an alternative method of crop protec–tion. Ecol. Chem. Eng. S. 17: 527-547. [in Polish with English abstract]
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Ramirez-Villapuda J., Munnecke D.E. 1987. Control of cabbage yellowsf.sp.by solar heating of field soils amended with dry cabbage residues. Plant Dis. 71: 217-221.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Ramirez-Villapuda J., Munnecke D.E. 1988. Effect of solar heating and soil amendments of cruciferous residues onf.sp.and other organisms. Phytopathology. 1988. 78: 289-295.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Sintayehu A., Fininsa C., Ahmed S., Sakhuja P.K. 2011. Evaluation of shallot genotypes for resistance against fusarium basal rotf.sp.disease. Crop Prot. 30: 1210-1215. DOI: 10.1016/j.croppro.2011.04.011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Smith S.N., Snyder W.C. 1971. Germination ofchlamydospores in soil fa–vorable and unfavorable to wilt establishment. Phytopathology 62: 273-277.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Smolińska U., Knudsen G.R., Morra M.J. 1997. Inhibi–tion off.sp.by vola–tiles produced by hydrolysis ofseed meal. Plant Dis. 81(3): 288-292.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Smolinska U. 2000. Survival ofsclerotia andchlamydo-spores in soil amended with cruciferous residues. J. Phytopathology 148(6): 343-349. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0434.2000.00519.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Smolinska U., Morra M.J., Knudsen G.R., James R.L. 2003. Isothiocyanates produced by Brassicaceae species as inhibitors ofPlant Dis. 87(4): 407-412.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Taylor A., Vagany V., Barbara D.J., Thomas B., Pink D.A.C., Jones J.E., Clarkson J.P. 2013. Identifica–tion of differential resistance to sixf. sp.isolates in commercial on–ion cultivars through the development of a rapid seedling assay. Plant Pathol. 62: 103-111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02624.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2014-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 (formerly 2300-5009) | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 123 - 129
Submitted on: Mar 31, 2014
Accepted on: Jun 3, 2014
Published on: Sep 10, 2014
Published by: National Institute of Horticultural Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Brassicaceae plants,
biofumigation,
Fusarium chlamydospores
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Biotechnology,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 Urszula Smolińska, Waldemar Kowalczyk, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 22 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
Previous article
Next article