Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Physiological Response of In Vitro Cultured MAGNOLIASP. to Nutrient Medium Composition Cover

Physiological Response of In Vitro Cultured MAGNOLIASP. to Nutrient Medium Composition

Journal of Horticultural Research
Volume 22 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
By: Rossen S. Sokolov,  Bistra Y. Atanassova and  Elena T. Iakimova  
Open Access
|Sep 2014

References

  1. Anderson W.C. 1980. Tissue culture propagation of red and black raspberries, Rubus idaeus and R. occidentalis. Acta Hort. 112: 13-20. http://www.actahort.org/books/112/112_1.htm.10.17660/ActaHortic.1980.112.1
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Biedermann I.E.G. 1987. Factors affecting estab–lishment and development of Magnolia hy–brids in vitro. Acta Hort. 212: 625-629. http://www.actahort.org/books/212/212_104.htm.10.17660/ActaHortic.1987.212.104
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Blaydes O.F. 1966. Interaction of kinetin and various inhibi–tors in the growth of soybean tissue. Physiol. Plant. 19: 748-753. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1966.tb07060.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1966.tb07060.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Burgos L., Ledbetter C.A. 1993. Improved efficiency in apricot breeding: Effects of embryo development and nutrient media on in vitro germination and seedling establishment. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 35: 217-222. DOI: 10.1007/BF00037273.10.1007/BF00037273
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Chalupa V. 1990. Micropropagation of hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Biol. Plant. 32: 332-338. DOI: 10.1007/BF02898493.10.1007/BF02898493
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Callaway D.J. 1994. The world of Magnolias. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA, 260 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Chée R., Pool R.M. 1987. Improved inorganic media constituents for in vitro shoot multiplication of Vitis vinifera. Sci. Hort. 32: 85-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(87)90019-7.10.1016/0304-4238(87)90019-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Coke J.E. 1996. Basal nutrient medium for in vitro cul–tures of loblolly pines. US Patent: 5, 534, 434.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. de Oliveira L.F., Ribas L.L.F., Quoirin M., Koehler H.S., Higa A.R. 2011. Micropropagation of Pinus taeda L. via axillary buds. BMC Proc. 5 (Suppl. 7): 144. DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P144.10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P144
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. De Proft M.P., Maene L.J., Debergh P.C. 1985. Car–bon dioxide and ethylene evolution in the cul–ture atmosphere of Magnolia cultured in vitro. Physiol. Plant. 65: 375-379. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb08660.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb08660.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Driver J.A., Kuniyuki A.H. 1984. In vitro propagation of Paradox walnut rootstock [Juglans hindsii x Jug-lans regia, tissue culture]. HortScience 19: 507-509.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Ďurkovic J. 2003. Regeneration of Acer caudatifo-lium Hayata plantlets from juvenile explants. Plant Cell Rep. 21: 1060-1064. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-003-0634-5.10.1007/s00299-003-0634-512835999
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Dutt M., Li Z.T., Dhekney S.A., Gray D.J. 2007. Transgenic plants from shoot apical meristems of Vitis vinifera L. “Thompson Seedless” via Agrobacte-rium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 26: 2101-2110. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-007-0424-6.10.1007/s00299-007-0424-617701039
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Emershad R.L., Ramming D.W. 1994. Effects of media on embryo enlargement, germination and plant de–velopment in early-ripening genotypes of Prunus grown in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 37: 55-59. DOI: 10.1007/BF00048117.10.1007/BF00048117
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Fenning T.M., Gartland K.M.A., Brasier C.M. 1993. Mi–cropropagation and regeneration of English Elm, Ulmus procera. J. Exp. Bot. 44: 1211-1217. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/44.7.1211.10.1093/jxb/44.7.1211
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Fernándes-Lorenzo J.L., Iglesias-Díaz M.I., Gutiérrez-Araujo O. 2000. Micropropagation of a selected root-stock of Acer palmatum. Acta Hort. 536: 347-353. http://www.actahort.org/books/536/536_40.htm.10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.536.40
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Fett-Neto A.G., Melanson S.J., Sakata K., DiCosmo F. 1993. Improved growth and taxol yield in develop–ing calli of Taxus cuspidata by medium composi–tion modification. Nat. Biotechnol. 11: 731-734. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0693-731.10.1038/nbt0693-731
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Figlar R.B., Nooteboom H.P. 2004. Notes on Mag-noliaceae IV. Blumea 49: 87-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651904X486214.10.3767/000651904X486214
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Gabryszewska E. 1997. Wpływ tidiazuronu i cytokinin na wzrost I rozwój pędów Magnolia x soulangeana ‘Alexandrina’ in vitro. In: Dubert F., Skoczowski A. (Eds.), Zastosowanie kultur in vitro w fizjologii roślin. PAN, Kraków, pp. 79-82. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Gamborg O.L., Miller R.A., Ojima K. 1968. Nutrient re–quirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5.10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Gray D.J., Benton C.M. 1991. In vitro micropropagation and plant establishment of muscadine grape cultivars (Vitis rotundifolia). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 27: 7-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF00048199.10.1007/BF00048199
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Hammatt N., Ridout M.S. 1992. Micropropagation of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 31: 67-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF00043477.10.1007/BF00043477
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Harada H., Murai Y. 1996. Micropropagation of Prunus mume. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 46: 265-261. Kamenická A. 1998. Influence of selected carbohydrates on rhizogenesis of shoots saucer magnolia in vitro. Acta Physiol. Plant. 20: 425-429. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-998-0030-4.10.1007/s11738-998-0030-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Kamenická A., Lanaková M. 2000. Effect of me–dium composition and type of vessel closure on axillary shoot production of magnolia in vitro. Acta Physiol. Plant. 22: 129-134. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-000-0067-5.10.1007/s11738-000-0067-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Kamenická A., Valka J. 1997. Cultivation and propaga–tion of magnolias. Technical University Publishers, Zvolen, Slovakia, pp. 42-82.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Kamenická A., Kormuťák A., Lanaková M. 2001. Estab–lishing micropropagation conditions for three Mag–nolia species. Propag. Ornam. Plants 1: 41-45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Linsmaier E.M., Skoog F. 1965. Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 18: 100-127. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1965.tb06874.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1965.tb06874.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Lloyd G., McCown B. 1980. Commercially-feasible mi–cropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifo-lia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 30: 421-427.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Marinescu L., Radomir A.M., Radu T., Teodorescu A., Fleancu M., Popescu C. 2008. Preliminary results regarding the influence of cytokinin on the micro–propagation of Magnolia soulangiana Soul. Lucrări Ştiinţifice, Seria B, Horticultura 51: 601-607.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Merkle S.A., Wiecko A.T. 1990. Somatic embryogenesis in three magnolia species. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115: 858-860.10.21273/JASHS.115.5.858
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Miller C.O. 1978. Cytokinin modification of metabolism of p-coumaric acid by a cell suspension of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Planta 140: 193-199. DOI: 10.1007/BF0039024810.1007/BF00390248
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Ming L., Huan-Cheng M.A. 2003. The review of the asexual propagation on Magnoliaceae. J. Southwest Forestry College 23: 92-96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cul–tures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Nakamura K., Wakita Y., Yokota S., Yoshizawa N., Idei T. 1995. Induction of multiple shoots by shoot apex culture in Magnolia obovata Thunb. Plant Tiss. Cult. Lett. 12(1): 34-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Orlikowska T., Gabryszewska E. 1995. In vitro propaga–tion of Acer rubrum cv. Red Sunset. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 3: 195-204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Parris J.K., Touchell D.H., Ranney T.G., Adelberg J. 2012. Basal salt composition, cytokinins, and phe–nolic binding agents influence in vitro growth and ex vitro establishment of Magnolia ‘Ann’. HortScience 47: 1625-1629.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Phelan S., Hunter A., Douglas G.C. 2009. Effect of explants source on shoot proliferation and adventitious regen–eration in 10 Buddleia. Sci. Hortic. 120: 518-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.009.10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Podwyszyńska M., Wojtania A., Gabryszewska E. 2000. Application of m-topolin for plant micropropaga–tion. Zesz. Nauk. Inst. Sadow. Kwiac. 7: 173-180. [in Polish with English abstract]
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Quoirin M., Lepoivre E. 1977. Improved media for in vitro culture of Prunus sp. Acta Hort. 78: 437-442.10.17660/ActaHortic.1977.78.54
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Radomir A.-M. 2012. Comparative study on the in vitro multiplication potential of Magnolia stellata and Magnolia x soulangiana species. J. Hort. Forest Biotechnol. 16: 39-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Radomir A.-M., Radu C.M. 2008. Research on behavior of Magnolia soulangeana in the multiplication stage of ‘in vitro ‘ culture. Lucrări Ştiinţifice, Seria B, Horticultura 51: 258-261.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Rugini E.1984. In vitro propagation of some olive (Olea europaea sativa L.) cultivars with dif–ferent rootability, and medium development using analytical data from developing shoots and embryos. Sci. Hortic. 24: 123-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(84)90143-2.10.1016/0304-4238(84)90143-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Rugini E., Caricato G. 1995. Somatic embryogenesis and plant recovery from mature tissues of olive cultivars (Olea europaea L.) ‘Canino’ and ‘Moraiolo’. Plant Cell Rep. 14: 257-260. DOI: 10.1007/BF00233645.10.1007/BF00233645
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Santos C.V., Brito G., Pinto G., Fonseca H.M.A.C. 2003. In vitro plantlet regeneration of Olea europaea ssp. Maderensis. Sci. Hortic. 97: 83-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00148-6.10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00148-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Shanjani P.S. 2003. Nitrogen effect on callus induction and plant regeneration of Juniperus excelsa. Int. J. Agr. Biol. 5: 419-422.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Standardi A., Catalano F. 1985. Tissue culture propaga–tion of kiwi fruit. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 34: 236-243.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Tang H., Ren Z., Krczal G. 2000. Improvement of English walnut somatic embryo germination and conversion by desiccation treatments and plantlet development by lower medium salts. In Vitro Cell. Dev. - Pl. 36: 47-50. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-000-0011-9.10.1007/s11627-000-0011-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Tubesing Ch. E. 1998. Magnolias with a future: Propaga–tion and nursery culture. In: Hunt D. (Ed.), Magno–lias and their allies. International Dendrology Soci–ety, Milborne Port, pp. 193-200.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Valova M., Krajcova D., Kamenická A. 1996. Changes of mineral elements in explant of Magnolia x soulangiana Soul.-Bod. during the culturing in vitro. Folia Dendrol. 21-22: 331-339.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Yu X., Reed B.M. 1993. Improved shoot multiplication of mature hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) in vitro using glucose as a carbon source. Plant Cell Rep. 12: 256-259. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237130.10.1007/BF0023713024197152
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Zefang T., Yahui H., Chao H. 2003. In vitro culture of Magnolia grandiflora. J. Hunan Agr. Univ. 29: 478-480.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Zhang C.H., Mei X.G., Liu L., Yu L.J. 2000. Enhanced paclitaxel production induced by the combination of elicitors in cell suspension cultures of Taxus chinensis. Biotechnol. Lett. 22: 1561-1564.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2014-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 61
Submitted on: Mar 16, 2014
Accepted on: Apr 14, 2014
Published on: Sep 10, 2014
Published by: National Institute of Horticultural Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
sp.,
basal medium,
plant growth regulators,
primary culture,
rooting,
shoot proliferation
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Biotechnology,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 Rossen S. Sokolov, Bistra Y. Atanassova, Elena T. Iakimova, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)Next article