Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Physiological Response of In Vitro Cultured MAGNOLIASP. to Nutrient Medium Composition Cover

Physiological Response of In Vitro Cultured MAGNOLIASP. to Nutrient Medium Composition

Journal of Horticultural Research
Volume 22 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Sep 2014
References

References

  1. Anderson W.C. 1980. Tissue culture propagation of red and black raspberries,andActa Hort. 112: 13-20. http://www.actahort.org/books/112/112_1.htm.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Biedermann I.E.G. 1987. Factors affecting estab–lishment and development ofhy–bridsActa Hort. 212: 625-629. http://www.actahort.org/books/212/212_104.htm.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Blaydes O.F. 1966. Interaction of kinetin and various inhibi–tors in the growth of soybean tissue. Physiol. Plant. 19: 748-753. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1966.tb07060.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Burgos L., Ledbetter C.A. 1993. Improved efficiency in apricot breeding: Effects of embryo development and nutrient media ongermination and seedling establishment. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 35: 217-222. DOI: 10.1007/BF00037273.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Chalupa V. 1990. Micropropagation of hornbeamL.) and ashL.). Biol. Plant. 32: 332-338. DOI: 10.1007/BF02898493.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Callaway D.J. 1994. The world of Magnolias. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA, 260 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Chée R., Pool R.M. 1987. Improved inorganic media constituents forshoot multiplication ofSci. Hort. 32: 85-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(87)90019-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Coke J.E. 1996. Basal nutrient medium forcul–tures of loblolly pines. US Patent: 5, 534, 434.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. de Oliveira L.F., Ribas L.L.F., Quoirin M., Koehler H.S., Higa A.R. 2011. Micropropagation ofL. via axillary buds. BMC Proc. 5 (Suppl. 7): 144. DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P144.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. De Proft M.P., Maene L.J., Debergh P.C. 1985. Car–bon dioxide and ethylene evolution in the cul–ture atmosphere ofculturedPhysiol. Plant. 65: 375-379. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb08660.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Driver J.A., Kuniyuki A.H. 1984.propagation of Paradox walnut rootstockxtissue culture]. HortScience 19: 507-509.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Ďurkovic J. 2003. Regeneration ofHayata plantlets from juvenile explants. Plant Cell Rep. 21: 1060-1064. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-003-0634-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Dutt M., Li Z.T., Dhekney S.A., Gray D.J. 2007. Transgenic plants from shoot apical meristems ofL. “Thompson Seedless” via Agrobacte-rium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 26: 2101-2110. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-007-0424-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Emershad R.L., Ramming D.W. 1994. Effects of media on embryo enlargement, germination and plant de–velopment in early-ripening genotypes ofgrownPlant Cell Tiss. Org. 37: 55-59. DOI: 10.1007/BF00048117.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Fenning T.M., Gartland K.M.A., Brasier C.M. 1993. Mi–cropropagation and regeneration of English Elm, Ulmus procera. J. Exp. Bot. 44: 1211-1217. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/44.7.1211.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Fernándes-Lorenzo J.L., Iglesias-Díaz M.I., Gutiérrez-Araujo O. 2000. Micropropagation of a selected root-stock ofActa Hort. 536: 347-353. http://www.actahort.org/books/536/536_40.htm.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Fett-Neto A.G., Melanson S.J., Sakata K., DiCosmo F. 1993. Improved growth and taxol yield in develop–ing calli ofby medium composi–tion modification. Nat. Biotechnol. 11: 731-734. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0693-731.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Figlar R.B., Nooteboom H.P. 2004. Notes on Mag-noliaceae IV. Blumea 49: 87-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651904X486214.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Gabryszewska E. 1997. Wpływ tidiazuronu i cytokinin na wzrost I rozwój pędówx‘Alexandrina’In: Dubert F., Skoczowski A. (Eds.), Zastosowanie kulturw fizjologii roślin. PAN, Kraków, pp. 79-82. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Gamborg O.L., Miller R.A., Ojima K. 1968. Nutrient re–quirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Gray D.J., Benton C.M. 1991.micropropagation and plant establishment of muscadine grape cultivarsPlant Cell Tiss. Org. 27: 7-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF00048199.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Hammatt N., Ridout M.S. 1992. Micropropagation of common ashPlant Cell Tiss. Org. 31: 67-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF00043477.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Harada H., Murai Y. 1996. Micropropagation ofPlant Cell Tiss. Org. 46: 265-261. Kamenická A. 1998. Influence of selected carbohydrates on rhizogenesis of shoots saucer magnoliaActa Physiol. Plant. 20: 425-429. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-998-0030-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Kamenická A., Lanaková M. 2000. Effect of me–dium composition and type of vessel closure on axillary shoot production of magnoliaActa Physiol. Plant. 22: 129-134. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-000-0067-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Kamenická A., Valka J. 1997. Cultivation and propaga–tion of magnolias. Technical University Publishers, Zvolen, Slovakia, pp. 42-82.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Kamenická A., Kormuťák A., Lanaková M. 2001. Estab–lishing micropropagation conditions for three Mag–nolia species. Propag. Ornam. Plants 1: 41-45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Linsmaier E.M., Skoog F. 1965. Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 18: 100-127. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1965.tb06874.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Lloyd G., McCown B. 1980. Commercially-feasible mi–cropropagation of mountain laurel,by use of shoot-tip culture. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 30: 421-427.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Marinescu L., Radomir A.M., Radu T., Teodorescu A., Fleancu M., Popescu C. 2008. Preliminary results regarding the influence of cytokinin on the micro–propagation ofSoul. Lucrări Ştiinţifice, Seria B, Horticultura 51: 601-607.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Merkle S.A., Wiecko A.T. 1990. Somatic embryogenesis in three magnolia species. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115: 858-860.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Miller C.O. 1978. Cytokinin modification of metabolism of p-coumaric acid by a cell suspension of soybean(L.) Merrill). Planta 140: 193-199. DOI: 10.1007/BF00390248
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Ming L., Huan-Cheng M.A. 2003. The review of the asexual propagation on Magnoliaceae. J. Southwest Forestry College 23: 92-96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cul–tures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Nakamura K., Wakita Y., Yokota S., Yoshizawa N., Idei T. 1995. Induction of multiple shoots by shoot apex culture inThunb. Plant Tiss. Cult. Lett. 12(1): 34-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Orlikowska T., Gabryszewska E. 1995.propaga–tion ofcv. Red Sunset. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 3: 195-204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Parris J.K., Touchell D.H., Ranney T.G., Adelberg J. 2012. Basal salt composition, cytokinins, and phe–nolic binding agents influencegrowth andestablishment of Magnolia ‘Ann’. HortScience 47: 1625-1629.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Phelan S., Hunter A., Douglas G.C. 2009. Effect of explants source on shoot proliferation and adventitious regen–eration in 10 Buddleia. Sci. Hortic. 120: 518-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.009.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Podwyszyńska M., Wojtania A., Gabryszewska E. 2000. Application of m-topolin for plant micropropaga–tion. Zesz. Nauk. Inst. Sadow. Kwiac. 7: 173-180. [in Polish with English abstract]
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Quoirin M., Lepoivre E. 1977. Improved media forculture of Prunus sp. Acta Hort. 78: 437-442.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Radomir A.-M. 2012. Comparative study on themultiplication potential ofandxspecies. J. Hort. Forest Biotechnol. 16: 39-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Radomir A.-M., Radu C.M. 2008. Research on behavior ofin the multiplication stage of ‘inculture. Lucrări Ştiinţifice, Seria B, Horticultura 51: 258-261.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Rugini E.1984.propagation of some oliveL.) cultivars with dif–ferent rootability, and medium development using analytical data from developing shoots and embryos. Sci. Hortic. 24: 123-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(84)90143-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Rugini E., Caricato G. 1995. Somatic embryogenesis and plant recovery from mature tissues of olive cultivarsL.) ‘Canino’ and ‘Moraiolo’. Plant Cell Rep. 14: 257-260. DOI: 10.1007/BF00233645.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Santos C.V., Brito G., Pinto G., Fonseca H.M.A.C. 2003.plantlet regeneration ofssp. Maderensis. Sci. Hortic. 97: 83-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00148-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Shanjani P.S. 2003. Nitrogen effect on callus induction and plant regeneration ofInt. J. Agr. Biol. 5: 419-422.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Standardi A., Catalano F. 1985. Tissue culture propaga–tion of kiwi fruit. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 34: 236-243.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Tang H., Ren Z., Krczal G. 2000. Improvement of English walnut somatic embryo germination and conversion by desiccation treatments and plantlet development by lower medium salts.Cell. Dev. - Pl. 36: 47-50. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-000-0011-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Tubesing Ch. E. 1998. Magnolias with a future: Propaga–tion and nursery culture. In: Hunt D. (Ed.), Magno–lias and their allies. International Dendrology Soci–ety, Milborne Port, pp. 193-200.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Valova M., Krajcova D., Kamenická A. 1996. Changes of mineral elements in explant ofxSoul.-Bod. during the culturingFolia Dendrol. 21-22: 331-339.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Yu X., Reed B.M. 1993. Improved shoot multiplication of mature hazelnutL.)using glucose as a carbon source. Plant Cell Rep. 12: 256-259. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237130.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Zefang T., Yahui H., Chao H. 2003.culture ofJ. Hunan Agr. Univ. 29: 478-480.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Zhang C.H., Mei X.G., Liu L., Yu L.J. 2000. Enhanced paclitaxel production induced by the combination of elicitors in cell suspension cultures ofBiotechnol. Lett. 22: 1561-1564.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2014-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 (formerly 2300-5009) | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 61
Submitted on: Mar 16, 2014
Accepted on: Apr 14, 2014
Published on: Sep 10, 2014
Published by: National Institute of Horticultural Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Magnolia sp.,
basal medium,
plant growth regulators,
primary culture,
rooting,
shoot proliferation
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Biotechnology,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2014 Rossen S. Sokolov, Bistra Y. Atanassova, Elena T. Iakimova, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 22 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
Previous article
Next article