Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Explainable AI and Ensemble Machine Learning Analysis of River Flow Dynamics: Influence of Key Climatic Variables (Temperature, Humidity, Precipitation) Cover

Explainable AI and Ensemble Machine Learning Analysis of River Flow Dynamics: Influence of Key Climatic Variables (Temperature, Humidity, Precipitation)

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Abderrahmane, B., Chahid, M., Aqnouy, M., Milewski, A. M., Lahcen, B., 2025. Evaluating time series models for monthly rainfall forecasting in arid regions: Insights from Tamanghasset (1953-2021), southern Algeria. Geosciences, 15(7), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15070273
  2. Aderemi, I. A., Kehinde, T. O., Ugochukwu, D. O., Ahmad, K. H., Adjei, K. Y., Chijioke, C. E., 2025. Beyond the black box: A systematic review of explainable AI for transparent and trustworthy water quality monitoring. IEEE Sensors Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1109/SR.2025.3595500
  3. Ahmed, A. A., Sayed, S., Abdoulhalik, A., Moutari, S., Oyedele, L., 2024. Applications of machine learning to water resources management: A review of present status and future opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 441, 140715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140715
  4. Balashov, E., Buchkina, N., Šimanský, V., Horák, J., 2021. Effects of slow and fast pyrolysis biochar on N2O emissions and water availability of two soils with high water-filled pore space. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 69(4), 467-474. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2021-0024
  5. Berger, K., 2018. Operational validation of HYDRUS (2D/3D) for capillary barriers using data of a 10-m tipping trough. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 66(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0059
  6. Bergmeir, C., Benítez, J. M., 2012. On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation. Information Sciences, 191, 192-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028
  7. Bramm, A. M., Matrenin, P. V., Khalyasmaa, A. I., 2025. A review of XAI methods applications in forecasting runoff and water level hydrological tasks. Mathematics, 13(17), 2830. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13172830
  8. Brenner, C., Meisch, C., Apperl, B., Schulz, K., 2016. Towards periodic and time-referenced flood risk assessment using airborne remote sensing. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 64(4), 438-447. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2016-0034
  9. Chang, W., Cheng, J., Allaire, J., Sievert, C., Schloerke, B., Xie, Y., Allen, J., McPherson, J., Dipert, A., Borges, B., 2023. Shiny: Web Application Framework for R (R package version1.8.0). https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.shiny
  10. Chen, T., Guestrin, C., 2016. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
  11. Cheng, M., Fang, F., Kinouchi, T., Navon, I. M., Pain, C. C., 2020. Long lead-time daily and monthly flowrate forecasting using machine learning methods. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125376
  12. Chiew, F. H. S., Zhou, S. L., McMahon, T. A., 2003. Use of seasonal flowrate forecasts in water resources management. Journal of Hydrology, 270(1-2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00292-5
  13. Çakır, M., Yılmaz, M., Ural, G. N., Oral, M. A., Oral, O., 2026. Flowrate forecasting and ecohydrodynamic insights from the Eşen Stream (Southwestern Türkiye): Time series perspectives. Tehnički vjesnik, 33(4) (in press). https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20251119003143
  14. Desai, S., Ouarda, T. B., 2021. Regional hydrological frequency analysis at ungauged sites with random forest regression. Journal of Hydrology, 594, 125861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125861
  15. Elitez, I., Yaltırak, C., 2024. Tectonic geomorphology of the south-eastern section of the Burdur-Fethiye Shear Zone, Western Taurides: morphotectonic framework of the Eşen Basin. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 33(5), 503-529. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0985.1927
  16. Feng, Z. K., Niu, W. J., Wan, X. Y., Xu, B., Zhu, F. L., Chen, J., 2022. Hydrological time series forecasting via signal decomposition and twin support vector machine using cooperation search algorithm for parameter identification. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128213
  17. Greenwell, B. M., Dahlmann, A., Dhoble, S., 2023. Explainable Boosting Machines with Sparsity--Maintaining Explainability in High-Dimensional Settings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07452. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.07452
  18. Hameed, M. M., Masood, A., Hamid, A., Elbeltagi, A., Razali, S. F. M., Salem, A., 2025. Forecasting monthly runoff in a glacierized catchment: a comparison of extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and deep learning models. Plos one, 20(5), e0321008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321008
  19. Hasan, N. A., Dongkai, Y., Al-Shibli, F., 2023. SPI and SPEI drought assessment and prediction using TBATS and ARIMA models, Jordan. Water, 15(20), 3598. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15203598
  20. Hečková, P., Bareš, V., Stránský, D., Sněhota, M., 2022. Performance of experimental bioretention cells during the first year of operation. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 70(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2021-0038
  21. Hejduk, S., Kasprzak, K., 2010. Specific features of water infiltration into soil with different management in winter and early spring period. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 58(3), 175. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10098-010-0016-y
  22. Hyndman, R. J., Khandakar, Y., 2008. Automatic time series forecasting: The forecast package for R. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i03
  23. Karakoca, E., Ünver, A., 2024. Analitik hiyerarşi süreci ve coğrafi bilgi sistemleri kullanarak Eşen Çayı Havzası’nda taşkın riski değerlendirmesi ve haritalandırılması. Geomatik, 10(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1542251
  24. Karol, K., 2025. The average and closure problem of turbulence theory resolved in random space. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 73(4), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2025-0026
  25. Kozel, T., Stary, M., 2022. Adaptive stochastic management of the storage function for a large, open reservoir using learned fuzzy models. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 70(2), 213-221. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2022-0010
  26. Kuhn, M., 2008. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28(5), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v028.i05
  27. Kursa, M. B., Rudnicki, W. R., 2010. Feature selection with the Boruta package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(11), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i11
  28. Liaw, A., Wiener, M., 2002. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News, 2(3), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.32614/RN-2002-022
  29. Lundberg, S. M., Lee, S.-I., 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765-4774. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874
  30. Mantovani, D., Veste, M., Gypser, S., Halke, C., Koning, L., Freese, D., Lebzien, S., 2014. Transpiration and biomass production of the bioenergy crop Giant Knotweed Igniscum under various supplies of water and nutrients. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 62(4), 316. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2014-0028
  31. Meyer, D., Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Weingessel, A., Leisch, F., 2023. e1071: Misc functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (Formerly: E1071), TU Wien (R package version 1.7-13). https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.e1071
  32. Mishra, S., Kaushal, D. R., 2025. Highly concentrated iron ore slurry flow through pipeline with and without chemical additive; part I: Experimental investigations and proposed model for the prediction of pressure drop. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 73(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2025-0011
  33. Molnar, C., 2023. Interpretable machine learning (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8213525
  34. Moore, D., Kostka, S., Boerth, T., Franklin, M., Ritsema, C., Dekker, L., Oostindie, K., Stoof, C., Wesseling, J., 2010. The effect of soil surfactants on soil hydrological behavior, the plant growth environment, irrigation efficiency and water conservation. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 58(3), 142. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10098-010-0013-1
  35. Naganna, S. R., Marulasiddappa, S. B., Balreddy, M. S., Yaseen, Z. M., 2023. Daily scale flowrate forecasting in multiple stream orders of Cauvery River, India: Application of advanced ensemble and deep learning models. Journal of Hydrology, 626, 130320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130320
  36. Najafabadi, E. F., Afzalimehr, H., Sui, J., 2015. Turbulence characteristics of favorable pressure gradient flows in gravelbed channel with vegetated walls. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 63(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2015-0019
  37. Núñez, J., Cortés, C. B., Yáñez, M. A., 2023. Explainable artificial intelligence in hydrology: Interpreting black-box snowmelt-driven flowrate predictions in an arid Andean basin of north-central Chile. Water, 15(19), 3369. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193369
  38. Orfanus, T., Amer, A. M. M., Jozefaciuk, G., Fulajtar, E., Čelková, A., 2017. Water vapour adsorption on water repellent sandy soils. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 65(4), 395. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0030
  39. Pavelková, H., Dohnal, M., Vogel, T., 2012. Hillslope runoff generation-comparing different modeling approaches. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 60(2), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10098-012-0007-2
  40. Považanová, B., Čistý, M., Bajtek, Z., 2023. Using feature engineering and machine learning in FAO reference evapotranspiration estimation. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 71(4), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2023-0032
  41. R Core Team., 2024. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://doi.org/10.32614/R-Core
  42. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C., 2016. Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135-1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
  43. Saci, R., Keblouti, M., Katipoğlu, O. M., Đurin, B., Majour, H., Sayad, L., Bouzahar, F., Benchaiba, L., 2025. Assessing the efficacy of various predictive models in simulating monthly reference evapotranspiration patterns and its impact on water resource management for agriculture in the Kebir-West watershed, North-East of Algeria. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 73(3), 284-294. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2025-0022
  44. Sadeghi-Pouya, A., Nouri, J., Mansouri, N., Kia-Lashaki, A., 2017. Developing an index model for flood risk assessment in the western coastal region of Mazandaran, Iran. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 65(2), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0007
  45. Schacht, K., Marschner, B., 2015. Treated wastewater irrigation effects on soil hydraulic conductivity and aggregate stability of loamy soils in Israel. Journal of Hydrology and hydromechanics, (1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2015-0010
  46. Shumova, N., 2009. Crop water supply and its relation to yield of spring wheat in the south of Russian plain. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 57(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10098-009-0003-3
  47. Song, Z., Xia, J., Wang, G., She, D., Hu, C., Hong, S., 2022. Regionalization of hydrological model parameters using gradient boosting machine. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26(2), 505-524. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-505-2022
  48. Szczepanek, R., 2022. Daily flowrate forecasting in mountainous catchment using XGB, LightGBM and CatBoost. Hydrology, 9(12), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120226
  49. Tareke, K. A., Awoke, A. G., 2023. Hydrological drought forecasting and monitoring system development using artificial neural network (ANN) in Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13287
  50. Tatar, O., 2025. Editorial Note to the article “Tectonic geomorphology of the south-eastern section of the Burdur-Fethiye Shear Zone, Western Taurides: morphotectonic framework of the Eşen Basin” [Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 33 (5) 2024 503-529]. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 34(5), 685-685. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0985.1983
  51. ten Veen, J. H., 2004. Extension of Hellenic forearc shear zones in SW Turkey: the Pliocene–Quaternary deformation of the Eşen Çay Basin. Journal of Geodynamics, 37(2), 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2004.02.001
  52. Venables, W. N., Ripley, B. D., 2002. Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
  53. Vyshnevskyi, V., Shevchuk, S., 2021. Thermal regime of the Dnipro Reservoirs. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 69(3), 300-310. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2021-0016
  54. Wickham, H., 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
  55. Yaseen, Z. M., 2023. A new benchmark on machine learning methodologies for hydrological processes modelling: A comprehensive review for limitations and future research directions. Knowledge-Based Engineering and Sciences, 4(3), 65-103. https://doi.org/10.51526/kbes.2023.4.3.65-103
  56. Zhang, J., Li, J., Shi, X., 2018. Encounter probability analysis of irrigation water and reference crop evapotranspiration in irrigation district. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 66(3), 279-284. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2018-0015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2026-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4333 | Journal ISSN: 0042-790X
Language: English
Page range: 113 - 124
Submitted on: Dec 26, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2026
Published on: Jun 20, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Mustafa Çakır, Gizem Nazlı Ural, Mükerrem Oral, Okan Oral, Mesut Yılmaz, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.