References
- Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., O’Connell, P.E., Rasmussen, J., 1986. An introduction to the European Hydrological System – Systeme Hydrologique Europeen (SHE). Part 1. History and philosophy of a physically-based distributed modelling system. Journal of Hydrology, 87, 45–59.
- Abebe, A.J., Price, R.K., 2004. Information theory and neural networks for managing uncertainty in flood routing. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 18, 4, 373–380.
- Abrahart, R.J., See, L.M., 2007. Neural network modelling of non-linear hydrological relationships. Journal of Earth System Science, 11, 5, 1563–1579.
- Ahmad, S., Simonovic, S.P., 2005. An artificial neural network model for generating hydrograph from hydro-meteorological parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 315, 1–4, 236–251.
- Anctil, F., Perrin, C., Andreassian, V., 2003. ANN output updating of lumped physically rainfall/runoff forecasting models. Water Resources Bulletin, 39, 5, 1269–1279.
- Anctil, F., Claude, M., Charles, P., Vazken, A., 2004. A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 286, 155–167.
- Anctil, F., Rat, A., 2005. Evaluation of neural network streamflow forecasting on 47 watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 1, 85–88.
- Asquith, W.H., Slade, R.M., 1997. Regional equations for estimation of peak-stream frequency for natural basins in Texas. Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4307, U.S. Geological Survey, Austin, Texas.
- ASCE Task Committee on Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, 2000. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 5, 2, 124–137.
- Aytek, A., Asce, M., Alp, M., 2008. An application of artificial intelligence for rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of Earth System Science, 117, 2, 145–155.
- Bertsekas, D.P., Tsitsiklis, J.N., 1996. Neuro-Dynamic Programming. Athena Scientific, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
- Beven, K.J., 2001. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
- Bhattacharya, B., Solomatine, D.P., 2000. Application of neural networks in stage-discharge relationships. In: Proc. 4th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Iowa City, USA.
- Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., 1970. Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, San Francisco, California, 537 p.
- Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., Bobe’e, B., 2001. Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 6, 5, 367–376.
- Cunderlik, J.M., 2003. Hydrologic Model Selection for the CFCAS Project: Assessment of Water Resources Risk and Vulnerability to Changing Climatic Condition, Water Resources Research Report no. 046. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, 38 p. ISBN: (print) 978-0-7714-2622-3; (online) 978-0-7714-2623-0.
- Cunderlik, J.M., Simonovic, S.P., 2004. Assessment of water resources risk and vulnerability to changing climatic conditions: Calibration and verification data for the HEC-HMS hydrologic model, Report No. II. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
- Devulapalli, R.S., 1995. Flood volume-duration-frequencies for ungaged rural catchment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
- Fleming, M., Neary, V., 2004. Continuous hydrologic modeling study with the Hydrologic Modeling System. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 9/3, 175–183.
- Foresee, F.D., Hagan, M.T., 1997. Gauss-Newton approximation to Bayesian regularization. In: Proc. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1930–1935.
- Gan, K.C., McMahon, T.A., O’Neill, I.C., 1991. Transposition of monthly streamflow data to ungauged catchments. Nordic Hydrology, 22, 2, 109–122.
- Gosain, A.K., Mani, A., Dwivedi, C., 2009. Hydrological modelling literature review: Report No.1. Indo-Norwegian Institutional Cooperation Program 2009–2011.
- Goswami, M., O’Connor, K.M., Bhattarai, K.P., Shamseldin, A.Y., 2005. Assessing the performance of eight real-time updating models and procedures for the Brosna River. Journal of Earth System Science, 9, 4, 394–411.
- Govindaraju, R.S., Rao, A.R., 2000. Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
- Hagan, M.T., Menhaj, M.B., 1994. Training feedforward networks with Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5, 6, 989–993.
- Hsu, K., Gupta, V.H., Sorroshian, S., 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research, 31, 10, 2517–2530.
- Iyer, M.S., Rhinehart, R.R., 1999. A method to determine the required number of neural-network training repetitions. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10, 2, 427–432.
- Jain, A., Srinivasulu, S., 2006. Integrated approach to model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and physically techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 317, 3–4, 291–306.
- Jennings, M.E., Thomas W.O., Riggs, H.C., 1994. Nationwide Summary of U. S. Geological Survey Regression Equations for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods for Ungaged Sites. Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4002, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
- MacKay, D.J.C., 1992. Bayesian interpolation. Neural computation, 4, 3, 415–447.
- Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K.L, Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., 2004. Improved streamflow forecasting using self-organizing radial basis function artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 295, 1–4, 246–262.
- Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I - A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 3, 282–290.
- Nguyen, D., Widrow, B., 1990. Improving the learning speed of 2-layer neural networks by choosing initial values of the adaptive weights. In: Proc. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 3, 21–26.
- Parent, A., Anctil, F., Cantin, V., Boucher, M., 2008. Neural network input selection for hydrological forecasting affected by snowmelt. Water Resources Bulletin, 44, 3, 679–688.
- Poff, N.L., Tokar, S., Johnson, P., 1996. Stream hydrological and ecological responses to climate change assessed with an artificial neural network. Limnology and Oceanography, 41, 5, 857–863.
- Prodanovic, P., Simonovic, S.P., 2006. Assessment of risk and vulnerability to changing climatic conditions: Inverse Flood Risk Modelling of the Upper Thames River Basin, Report No. VIII. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
- Rajurkar, M.P., Kothyari, U.C., Chaube, U.C., 2004. Modeling of the daily rainfall runoff relationship with artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 285, 96–113.
- Refsgaard, J.C., 1996. Terminology, modelling protocol and classification of hydrologic model codes. In: Abbott. M.B., Refsgaard, J.C. (Eds.): Distributed Hydrologic Modelling, pp. 41–54.
- Schreider, S., Young, P., Jakeman, A., 2001. An application of the Kalman filtering technique for streamflow forecasting in the Upper Murray Basin. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 33, 733–743.
- Takagi, T., Sugeno, M., 1985. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modelling and control. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernectics, 15, 116–132.
- Thirumalaiah, K., Deo, M.C., 1998. River stage forecasting using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 3, 1, 26–32.
- USACE, 2000. Hydrologic Modelling System HEC–HMS: Technical reference manual. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, California.
- UTRCA, 2009. Inspiring a Healthy Environment: Flooding on the Thames River. Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, London, Ontario, Canada. Available online at http://www.thamesriver.on.ca/Water_Management/flood_history.htm - last accessed January 29, 2010.
- Vrugt, J.A., Diks, C.G.H., Gupta, H.V., Bouten, W., Verstraten, J.M., 2005. Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation. Water Resour. Res., 41, 1.
- Wardah, T., Abu Bakar, S.H., Bardossy, A., Maznorizan, M., 2008. Use of geostationary meteorological satellite images in convective rain estimation for flash-flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 356, 3–4, 283–298.
- Wilcox, I., Quinlan, C., Rogers, C., Troughton, M., McCallum, I., Quenneville, A., Heagy, E., Dool, D., 1998. The Thames River Basin: A Background Study for Nomination under the Canadian Heritage Rivers System. Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, London, Ontario, Canada.
- Wurbs, R.A., Sisson, E.D., 1999. Comparative evaluation of methods for distributing naturalized streamflows from gauged to ungauged sites. Technical Report No. 179, College Station: Texas A & M University, Water Resources Institute.
- Xiong, L., O’Connor, K.M., 2002. Comparison of four updating models for real-time river flow forecasting. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 47, 4, 621–639.
- Xiong, L., O’Connor, K.M., Guo, S., 2004. Comparison of three updating schemes using artificial neural network in flow forecasting. Journal of Earth System Science, 8, 2, 247–255.
- Yu, F.X.Y., Pardue, J., Adrian, D.D., 1997. Evaluation of nine models for ungauged urban basins in Louisiana. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 33, 1, 97–110.