Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Daily rainfall estimates considering seasonality from a MODWT-ANN hybrid model Cover

Daily rainfall estimates considering seasonality from a MODWT-ANN hybrid model

Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. Addison, P.S., Murray, K.B., Watson, J.N., 2001. Wavelet transform analysis of open channel wake flows. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 127, 58–70.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:1(58)
  2. Bašta, M., 2014. Additive decomposition and boundary conditions in wavelet-based forecasting approaches. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 2014, 48–70.10.18267/j.aop.431
  3. Bonal, D., Burban, B., Stahl, C., Wagner, F., Hérault, B., 2016. The response of tropical rainforests to drought - lessons from recent research and future prospects. Annals of Forest Science, 73, 27–44. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-015-0522-510.1007/s13595-015-0522-5481088827069374
  4. Chai, T., Draxler, R.R., 2014. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7, 1247–1250. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-1247-201410.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014
  5. Chau, K.W., Wu, C.L., 2010. A hybrid model coupled with singular spectrum analysis for daily rainfall prediction. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 12, 458–473. DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2010.03210.2166/hydro.2010.032
  6. Cuo, L., Pagano, T.C., Wang, Q.J., 2011. A review of quantitative precipitation forecasts and their use in short-to-medium streamflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12, 713–728.10.1175/2011JHM1347.1
  7. Daubechies, I., 1992. Ten Lectures on Wavelet. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.978161197010410.1137/1.9781611970104
  8. dos Santos, T.S., Mendes, D., Torres, R.R., 2016. Artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression model using principal components to estimate rainfall over South America. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 23, 13–20. DOI: 10.5194/npg-23-13-201610.5194/npg-23-13-2016
  9. Du, K., Zhao, Y., Lei, J., 2017. The incorrect usage of singular spectral analysis and discrete wavelet transform in hybrid models to predict hydrological time series. J. Hydrol., 552, 44–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.01910.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.019
  10. Espinoza, J.C., Segura, H., Ronchail, J., Drapeau, G., Gutierrez-Cori, O., 2016. Evolution of wet-day and dry-day frequency in the western Amazon basin: Relationship with atmospheric circulation and impacts on vegetation. Water Resources Research, 52, 8546–8560. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR01930510.1002/2016WR019305
  11. Fahimi, F., Yaseen, Z.M., El-shafie, A., 2017. Application of soft computing based hybrid models in hydrological variables modeling: a comprehensive review. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 128, 875–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1735-810.1007/s00704-016-1735-8
  12. Falck, A.S., Maggioni, V., Tomasella, J., Vila, D.A., Diniz, F.L., 2015. Propagation of satellite precipitation uncertainties through a distributed hydrologic model: A case study in the Tocantins–Araguaia basin in Brazil. Journal of Hydrology, 527, 943–957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.04210.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.042
  13. Frumau, K.A., Bruijnzeel, L.A., Tobón, C., 2011. Precipitation measurement and derivation of precipitation inclination in a windy mountainous area in northern Costa Rica. Hydrological Processes, 25, 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.786010.1002/hyp.7860
  14. Germano, M.F., Vitorino, M.I., Cohen, J.C.P., Costa, G.B., Souto, J.I.D.O., Rebelo, M.T.C., de Sousa, A.M.L., 2017. Analysis of the breeze circulations in Eastern Amazon: an observational study. Atmospheric Science Letters, 18, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.72610.1002/asl.726
  15. Gloor, M.R.J.W., Brienen, R.J., Galbraith, D., Feldpausch, T.R., Schöngart, J., Guyot, J.L., Phillips, O.L., 2013. Intensification of the Amazon hydrological cycle over the last two decades. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 1729–1733. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.5037710.1002/grl.50377
  16. Gnanadesikan, R., 2011. Methods for Statistical Data Analysis of Multivariate Observations. John Wiley & Sons. DOI:10.1002/978111803267110.1002/9781118032671
  17. Golding, B.W., 2014. Regional prediction models. In: North, G., Pyle, J., Zhang, F. (Eds.): Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences. 2nd Edition. Academic Press, p. 2008.
  18. Gomes, E.P., Blanco, C.J.C., Pessoa, F.C.L., 2018. Regionalization of precipitation with determination of homogeneous regions via fuzzy c-means. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, 23. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.23182018007910.1590/2318-0331.231820180079
  19. Guimarães Santos, C.A., Silva, G.B.L.D., 2014. Daily stream-flow forecasting using a wavelet transform and artificial neural network hybrid models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59, 312–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.80094410.1080/02626667.2013.800944
  20. Gupta, A., Kamble, T., Machiwal, D., 2017. Comparison of ordinary and Bayesian kriging techniques in depicting rainfall variability in arid and semi-arid regions of north-west India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76, 512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6814-310.1007/s12665-017-6814-3
  21. He, X., Guan, H., Qin, J., 2015. A hybrid wavelet neural network model with mutual information and particle swarm optimization for forecasting monthly rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, 527, 88–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.0470022.
  22. Hellassa, S., Souag-Gamane, D., 2019. Improving a stochastic multi-site generation model of daily rainfall using discrete wavelet de-noising: a case study to a semi-arid region. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12, 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4168-010.1007/s12517-018-4168-0
  23. Holdefer, A.E., Severo, D.L., 2015. Análise por ondaletas sobre níveis de rios submetidos à influência de maré. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, 20, 192–201. DOI: 10.21168/rbrh.v20n1.p192-20110.21168/rbrh.v20n1.p192-201
  24. IBGE – INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Cobertura do uso da terra do Brasil (Land use coverage in Brazil). Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2014. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geocienciasnovoportal/informacoes-ambientais/cobertura-e-uso-da-terra (accessed in 13 Sept. 2017)
  25. Kisi, O., Cimen, M., 2011. A wavelet-support vector machine conjunction model for monthly streamflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 399, 132–140.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.041
  26. Kisi, O., Shiri, J., 2011. Precipitation forecasting using wavelet-genetic programming and wavelet-neuro-fuzzy conjunction models. Water Resources Management, 25, 3135–3152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9849-310.1007/s11269-011-9849-3
  27. Kuo, C.C., Gan, T.Y., Yu, P.-S., 2010. Wavelet analysis on the variability, teleconnectivity, and predictability of the seasonal rainfall of Taiwan. Monthly Weather Review, 138, 162–175.10.1175/2009MWR2718.1
  28. Lang, K.J., Hinton, G.E., 1988. The development of the time-delay neural network architecture for speech recognition. Technical Report CMU-CS-88-152.
  29. Latrubesse, E.M., Arima, E.Y., Dunne, T., Park, E., Baker, V.R., d’Horta, F.M., Ribas, C.C., 2017. Damming the rivers of the Amazon basin. Nature, 546, 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2233310.1038/nature22333
  30. Levy, M.C., Cohn, A., Lopes, A.V., Thompson, S.E., 2017. Addressing rainfall data selection uncertainty using connections between rainfall and streamflow. Scientific Reports, 7, 219. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00128-510.1038/s41598-017-00128-5
  31. Maheswaran, R., Khosa, R., 2012. Comparative study of different wavelets for hydrologic forecasting. Computers & Geosciences, 46, 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.01510.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.015
  32. Mallat, S., 2009. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, 832 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374370-1.X0001-8.10.1016/B978-0-12-374370-1.X0001-8
  33. Mehr, A.D., Kahya, E., Bagheri, F., Deliktas, E., 2014. Successive-station monthly streamflow prediction using neurowavelet technique. Earth Science Informatics, 7, 217–229. DOI: 10.1007/s12145-013-0141-310.1007/s12145-013-0141-3
  34. Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 282–290. http://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-610.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  35. Nerantzaki, S.D., Papalexiou, S.M., 2019. Tails of extremes: Advancing a graphical method and harnessing big data to assess precipitation extremes. Advances in Water Resources, 134, Article Number: 103448.10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103448
  36. Nourani, V., Baghanam, A.H., Adamowski, J., Kisi, O., 2014. Applications of hybrid wavelet–artificial intelligence models in hydrology: a review. Journal of Hydrology, 514, 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.05710.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.057
  37. Nourani, V., Andalib, G., Sadikoglu, F., 2017. Multi-station streamflow forecasting using wavelet denoising and artificial intelligence models. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 617–624. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.28710.1016/j.procs.2017.11.287
  38. Oliveira-Junior, J.F.D., Xavier, F.M.G., Teodoro, P.E., Gois, G.D., Delgado, R.C., 2017. Cluster analysis identified rainfall homogeneous regions in Tocantins State, Brazil. Bioscience Journal, 33, 333–340. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n2-3273910.14393/BJ-v33n2-32739
  39. Osborn, T.J., Wallace, C.J., Harris, I.C., Melvin, T.M., 2016. Pattern scaling using ClimGen: monthly-resolution future climate scenarios including changes in the variability of precipitation. Climatic Change, 134, 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1509-910.1007/s10584-015-1509-9
  40. Partal, T., Kişi, Ö., 2007. Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 342, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.02610.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.026
  41. Partal, T., Cigizoglu, H.K., 2009. Prediction of daily precipitation using wavelet—neural networks. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54:2, 234–246, DOI: 10.1623/hysj.54.2.23410.1623/hysj.54.2.234
  42. Partal, T., Cigizoglu, H.K., Kahya, E., 2015. Daily precipitation predictions using three different wavelet neural network algorithms by meteorological data. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29, 1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1061-110.1007/s00477-015-1061-1
  43. Percival, D.B., Walden, A.T., 2000. Wavelet methods for time series analysis. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  44. Ramana, R.V., Krishna, B., Kumar, S.R., Pandey, N.G., 2013. Monthly rainfall prediction using wavelet neural network analysis. Water Resources Management, 27, 3697–3711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0374-410.1007/s11269-013-0374-4
  45. Ramírez-Hernández, J., Infante-Prieto, S.O., Villa-Angulo, R., Hallack-Alegría, M., 2016. La influencia del efecto de borde en el pronóstico de precipitaciones utilizando DWT diádica, MODWT, ANN y ANFIS. Tecnología y ciencias del agua, 73, 93–113.
  46. Reichle, R.H., Liu, Q., Koster, R.D., Draper, C.S., Mahanama, S.P., Partyka, G.S., 2017. Land surface precipitation in MERRA-2. Journal of Climate, 30, 1643–1664. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0570.110.1175/JCLI-D-16-0570.1
  47. Rivera, D., Lillo, M., Uvo, C.B., Billib, M., Arumí, J.L., 2012. Forecasting monthly precipitation in Central Chile: a self-organizing map approach using filtered sea surface temperature. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 107, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0453-510.1007/s00704-011-0453-5
  48. Sang, Y.F., 2012. A practical guide to discrete wavelet decomposition of hydrologic time series. Water Resources Management, 26, 3345–3365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0075-410.1007/s11269-012-0075-4
  49. Santos, C.A., Freire, P.K., Silva, R.M.D., Akrami, S.A., 2019. Hybrid wavelet neural network approach for daily inflow forecasting using Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 24, Article Number: 04018062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.000172510.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001725
  50. Shoaib, M., Shamseldin, A.Y., Melville, B.W., Khan, M.M., 2016. A comparison between wavelet based static and dynamic neural network approaches for runoff prediction. Journal of Hydrology, 535, 211–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.07610.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.076
  51. Siad, S.M., Iacobellisb, V., Zdrulie, P., Gioiab, A., Stavid, I., Hoogenboom, G., 2019. A review of coupled hydrologic and crop growth models. Agricultural Water Management, 224, Article Number: 105746.10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105746
  52. Silva, I.D., Spatti, D.H., Flauzino, R.A., 2010. Redes neurais artificiais para engenharia e ciências aplicadas. Artliber, São Paulo, Brasil, 646 p.
  53. Sulaiman, S.O., Shiri, J., Shiralizadeh, H., Kisi, O., Yaseen, Z.M., 2018. Precipitation pattern modeling using cross-station perception: regional investigation. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77, 709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7898-010.1007/s12665-018-7898-0
  54. Tealab, A., Hefny, H., Badr, A., 2017. Forecasting of nonlinear time series using ANN. Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 2, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcij.2017.05.00110.1016/j.fcij.2017.05.001
  55. Teodoro, P.E., de Oliveira-Júnior, J.F., Da Cunha, E.R., Correa, C.C.G., Torres, F.E., Bacani, V.M., Ribeiro, L.P., 2016. Cluster analysis applied to the spatial and temporal variability of monthly rainfall in Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 128, 197–209. DOI: 10.1007/s00703-015-0408-y10.1007/s00703-015-0408-y
  56. Wang, X.Y., Li, X., Zhu, J., Tanajura, C.A., 2018. The strengthening of Amazonian precipitation during the wet season driven by tropical sea surface temperature forcing. Environmental Research Letters, 13, Article Number: 094015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadbb910.1088/1748-9326/aadbb9
  57. Wilks, D.S., 1989. Conditioning stochastic daily precipitation models on total monthly precipitation. Water Resources Research, 25, 1429–1439. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR025i006p0142910.1029/WR025i006p01429
  58. Wilks, D.S., 1999. Interannual variability and extreme-value characteristics of several stochastic daily precipitation models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 93, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00125-710.1016/S0168-1923(98)00125-7
  59. Yaseen, Z.M., Jaafar, O., Deo, R.C., Kisi, O., Adamowski, J., Quilty, J., El-Shafie, A., 2016. Stream-flow forecasting using extreme learning machines: A case study in a semi-arid region in Iraq. Journal of Hydrology, 542, 603–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.03510.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.035
  60. Zhang, X., Peng, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, B., 2015. Are hybrid models integrated with data preprocessing techniques suitable for monthly streamflow forecasting? Some experiment evidences. J. Hydrol., 530, 137–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.04710.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.047
  61. Zeri, M., Cunha-Zeri, G., Gois, G., Lyra, G.B., Oliveira-Júnior, J.F., 2019. Exposure assessment of rainfall to inter-annual variability using the wavelet transform. International Journal of Climatology, 39, 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.581210.1002/joc.5812
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2020-0043 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4333 | Journal ISSN: 0042-790X
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 28
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 13, 2020
Published on: Jan 26, 2021
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2021 Evanice Pinheiro Gomes, Claudio José Cavalcante Blanco, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.