Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improved higher lead time river flow forecasts using sequential neural network with error updating Cover

Improved higher lead time river flow forecasts using sequential neural network with error updating

Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics
Volume 62 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Feb 2014
References

References

  1. Abrahart, R.J., See, L.M., Dawson, C.W., Shamseldin, A.Y., Wilby, R.L., 2010. Nearly Two Decades of Neural Network Hydrological Modeling. In: Sivakumar, B., Berndtsson, R., (Eds.): Advances in data-based approaches for hydrologic modeling and forecasting. World Scientific.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Arduino, G., Reggiani, P., Todini, E., 2005. Recent advances in flood forecasting and flood risk assessment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 9, 4, 280-284.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, 2000a. Artificial neural networks in hydrology I: Preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 2, 115-123.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, 2000b. Artificial neural networks in hydrology II: Hydrologic applications. J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 2, 124-137.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Birkundavyi, S., Labib, R., Trung, H.T., Rousselle, J., 2002. Performance of neural networks in daily streamflow forecasting. J. Hydrol. Eng., 7, 5, 392-398.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Bowden, G.J., Dandy, G.C., Maier, H.R., 2005. Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1-Background and methodology. J. Hydrol., 301, 1-4, 75-92.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Bruen, M., Yang, J., 2005. Functional networks in real-time flood forecasting-novel application. Advances in Water Resour., 28, 899-909.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Campolo, M., Andreussi, P., Soldati, A., 1999. River flood forecasting with neural network model. Water Resour. Res., 35, 4, 1191-1197.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Corani, G., Guariso, G., 2005. An application of pruning in the design of neural networks for real rime flood forecasting. Neural Computation and Application, 14, 66-77.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., Bobee, B., 2001. Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural network. J. Hydrol. Eng., 6, 5, 367-376.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., Bobee, B., 2000. Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. J. Hydrol., 230, 244-257.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Coulibaly, P., 2003. Impact of metrological predictions on realtime spring flow forecasting. Hydol. Process., 17, 3791-3801.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Coulibaly, P., Hache, M., Fortin, V., Bobee, B., 2005. Improving daily reservoir inflow forecasts with model combination. J. Hydrol., 10, 2, 91-99.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Dawson, C.W., Wilby, R.L., 2001. Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Progress in Physical Geography, 25, 1, 80-108.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Dawson, C.W., See, L.M., Abrahart, R.J., Heppenstall, A., 2006. Symbiotic adaptive neuro-evolution applied to rainfall- runoff modelling in northern England. Neural Networks, 19, 236-247.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. de Vos, N.J., Rientjes, T.H.M., 2005. Constraints of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modelling: trade-offs in hydrological state representation and model evaluation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 9, 111-126.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, V., 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Res., 28, 4, 1015-1031.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. French, M.N., Krajewski, W.F., Cuykendall, R.R., 1992. Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. J. Hydrol., 137, 1-31.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Gupta, V.K., Sorooshian, S., 1985. The relationship between data and the precision of parameter estimates of hydrologic models. J. Hydrol., 81, 1-2, 57-77.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Holland, J.H., 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial System. Mass. Inst. of Technol. Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Hsu, K., Gupta, V.H., Sorroshian, S., 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour. Res., 31, 10, 2517-2530.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Chang, F.J., Chiang, Y.M., Chang, L.C., 2007. Multi-stepahead neural networks for flood forecasting. Hydrol. Sciences- J., 52, 1, 114-130.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Chetan, M., Sudheer, K.P., 2006. A hybrid linear-neural model for river flow forecasting. Water Resour. Res., 42, 4, W04402.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Jain, A., Srinivasulu, S., 2004. Development of effective and efficient rainfall-runoff models using integration of deterministic, real-coded genetic algorithms and artificial neural network techniques. Water Resour. Res., 40, 1029-2003.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Jain, A., Sudheer, K.P., Srinivasulu, S., 2004. Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models. Hydrol. Process., 18, 3, 571-581.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Karunanithi, N., Grenney, W.J., Whitley, D., Bovee, K., 1994. Neural networks for river flow prediction. J. Computing in Civil Eng., 8, 2, 201-220.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Khu, S.T., Liong, S.Y., Babovic, V., Madsen, H., Muttil, N., 2001. Genetic programming and its application in real-time runoff forecasting. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37, 2, 439-451.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Kneale, P.E., See, L., Smith, A., 2001. Towards defining evaluation measures for neural network forecasting models. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on GeoComputation, University of Queensland, Australia, available at http://www.geocomputation.org/2001/papers/kneal.pdf (Last accessed on March 2, 2007).
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Kwok, T.Y., Yeung, D.Y., 1997. Objective functions for training new hidden units in constructiveneural networks. Neural Networks, IEEE, 8, 5, 1131-1148.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Le Cun, Y., Denker, J.S., Solla, S.A., 1990. Optimal brain damage. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California, pp. 598-605.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Madsen, H., 2000. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall- runoff model using multiple objectives. J. Hydrol., 235, 276-288.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Madsen, H., Skotner, C., 2005. Adaptive state updating in realtime flow forecasting-a combined filtering and error forecasting procedure. J. Hydrol., 308, 302-312.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Madsen, H., Butts, M.B., Khu, S.T., Liong, S.Y., 2000. Data assimilation in rainfall-runoff forecasting, Hydroinformatics. 4th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA, 23-27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Maier, H.R., Dandy, G.C., 1997. Determining inputs for neural network models of multivariate time series. Microcomput. Civ. Eng., 12, 353- 368.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Maier, H.R., Dandy, G.C., 2000. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 15, 101-124.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Maier, H.R., Jain, A., Dandy, G.C., Sudheer, K.P., 2010. Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: Current status and future directions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 8, 891-909.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Mathworks, 2004. Genetic algorithm and direct search tool box for use in MATLAB. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. McCuen, R.H., 2003. Modeling hydrologic change. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. McCulloch, W.S., Pitts, W., 1943. A logic calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. of Math. Biophys., 5, 115-133.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Moore, R.J., 1986. Advances in real-time forecasting practice. Invited paper, Symposium on Flood Warning System, Winter Meeting of the River Enginnering Section, The Institution of Water Engineers and Scientists, 23 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Nayak, P.C., Sudheer, K.P., Rangan, D.M., Ramasastri, K.S., 2005. Short-term flood forecasting with a neurofuzzy model. Water Resour. Res., 41, 4, W04004.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Nayak, P.C., Sudheer, K.P., Jain, S.K., 2007. Rainfall-runoff modelling through hybrid intelligent system. Water Resour. Res. 43, 7, W07415.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Nazemi, A., Pookhadem, H.N., Mohammad, R., Akbarzadeh, T., Hosseini, S.M., 2003. Evolutionar neural network modeling for describing rainfall-runoff process. Hydrology Days, 224-235.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Pan, T.Y., Wang, R.Y., 2004. State space neural networks for short term rainfall-runoff forecasting. J. Hydrol., 297, 32-50.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Parasuraman, K., Elshorbagy, A., 2007. Cluster-Based Hydrologic Prediction Using Genetic Algorithm-Trained Neural Networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., 12, 1, 52-62.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Refsgaard, J.C., 1997. Validation and intercomparison of different updating procedures for real-time forecasting. Nordic Hydrol., 28, 65-84.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J., 1986. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533-536.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Sajikumara, N., Thandaveswara, B.S., 1999. A non-linear rainfall- runoff model using an artificial neural network. J. Hydrol., 216, 32-55.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Shamseldin, A.Y., 1997. Application of a neural network technique to rainfall runoff modelling. J. Hydrol., 199, 272-294.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Shamseldin, A.Y., O’Connor, K.M., 2001. A non-linear neural network technique for updating of river flow forecasts. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5, 4, 577-597.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Sudheer, K.P., 2009. Real time flood forecasting by artificial neural network by extending the forecast lead time. Journal of Hydrological Research and Development, 24, 89-108.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Sudheer, K.P., Gosain, A.K., Ramasastri, K.S., 2002. A datadriven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Process., 16, 1325-1330.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. Sudheer, K.P., Nayak, P.C., Ramasastri, K.S., 2003. Improving peak flow estimates in artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrol. Process., 17, 3, 677-686.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. Thirumalaiah, K., Deo, M.C., 2000. Hydrological forecasting using neural networks, J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 2, 180-189.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Tokar, A.S., Johnson, A., 1999. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artifical neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., 4, 3, 232-239.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. US West Optical Company, 1989a. HYDRODATA: USGS daily and peak flows values. Denver, Colo.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. US West Optical Company, 1989b. CLIMATEDATA: Daily total rainfall and average temperature values. Denver, Colorado, USA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Wang, W., Van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M., Vrijling, J.K., Ma, J., 2006. Forecasting daily streamflow using hybrid ANN models. J. Hydrol., 324, 383-399.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. WMO, 1992. Simulated real-time intercomparison of hydrological models. Operational Hydrology Report No. 38, World Meteorological Organization, Ganeva.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Zealand, C.M., Burn, D.H., Simonovic, S.P., 1999. Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol., 214, 32-48.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2014-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4333 (formerly 0042-790X) | Journal ISSN: 0042-790X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 60 - 74
Published on: Feb 13, 2014
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
River flow forecasting,
Forecast lead time,
Error updating,
Artificial neural network,
Genetic algorithm
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2014 Om Prakash, K.P. Sudheer, K. Srinivasan, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 62 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)
Previous article
Next article