References
- Tur E. Physiology of the skin—differences between women and men. Clin Dermatol. 1997; 15: 5–16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-081X(96)00105-8 - Giacomoni PU, Mammone T, Teri M. Gender-linked differences in human skin. J Dermatol Sci. 2009; 55: 144–149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.06.001 - Eisenbeiss C, Welzel J, Schmeller W. The influence of female sex hormones on skin thickness: evaluation using 20 MHz sonography. Br J Dermatol. 1998; 139: 462–467.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02410.x - Bari DS, Salih JM, Aldosky HY, Martinsen ØG. Impact of gender differences and body mass index on skin biophysical parameters of coronavirus patients. SJUOZ. 2024; 12: 336–339.
https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2024.12.3.1306 - Pochi PE, Strauss JS. Endocrinologic control to the development and activity of the human sebaceous gland. J Invest Dermatol. 1974; 62: 191–201.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12676783 - Yosipovitch G, Reis J, Tur E, Sprecher E, Yarnitsky D, Boner G. Sweat secretion, stratum corneum hydration, small nerve function and pruritus in patients with advanced chronic renal failure. Br J Dermatol. 1995; 133: 561–564.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb02705.x - Green JM, Bishop PA, Muir IH, Lomax RG. Gender differences in sweat lactate. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000; 82: 230–235.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050676 - Tronstad C, Gjein GE, Grimnes S, Martinsen ØG, Krogstad AL, Fosse E. Electrical measurement of sweat activity. Physiol Meas. 2008; 29: S407.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S34 - Martinsen ØG, Grimnes S. Long-term effect of some skin moisturizers. Open Dermatol J. 2008; 2(1):87–9.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874372200802010087 - Bari DS, Ali ZK, Hameed SA, Aldosky HY. Evaluation of the effect of several moisturizing creams using the low frequency electrical susceptance approach. J Electr Bioimpedance. 2024; 15: 4–9.
https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2024-0002 - Boucsein W. Electrodermal activity. Berlin: Plenum Press; 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0 - Posada-Quintero HF, Chon KH. Innovations in electrodermal activity data collection and signal processing: A systematic review. Sensors. 2020; 20: 479.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020479 - Aldosky HYY, Bari DS. Electrodermal activity: simultaneous recordings. In: El-Azazy M, Min M, Annus P, editors. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. London: IntechOpen; 2019. p. 519–551.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89025 - Qasim MS, Bari DS, Martinsen ØG. Influence of ambient temperature on tonic and phasic electrodermal activity components. Physiol Meas. 2022; 43: 065001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac72f4 - Bari DS, Aldosky HY, Tronstad C, Kalvøy H, Martinsen ØG. Influence of relative humidity on electrodermal levels and responses. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2018; 31: 298–307.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000492275 - Bari DS, Aldosky HY, Tronstad C, Martinsen ØG. Disturbances in electrodermal activity recordings due to different noises in the environment. Sensors. 2024; 24: 5434.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165434 - Bari DS, Aldosky HYY, Martinsen ØG. Simultaneous measurement of electrodermal activity components correlated with age-related differences. J Biol Phys. 2020; 46: 177–188.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-020-09547-4 - Bari DS. Gender differences in tonic and phasic electrodermal activity components. SJUOZ. 2020; 8: 29–33.
https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2020.8.1.670 - Fowles DC, Rosenberry R. Effects of epidermal hydration on skin potential responses and levels. Psychophysiology. 1973; 10: 601–611.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1973.tb00810.x - Fowles DC, Schneider RE. Effects of epidermal hydration on skin conductance responses and levels. Biol Psychol. 1974, 2: 67–77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(74)90032-5 - Garwood MK, Engel BT, Quilter RE. Age differences in the effect of epidermal hydration on electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology. 1979; 16: 311–317.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb02996.x - Garwood MK, Engel BT, Kusterer JP. Skin potential level: age and epidermal hydration effects. J Gerontol. 1981; 36: 7–13.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/36.1.7 - Fowles DC, Schneider RE. Electrolyte medium effects on measurements of palmar skin potential. Psychophysiology. 1978; 15: 474–482.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01418.x - Bari DS, Aldosky HY, Tronstad C, Kalvøy H, Martinsen ØG. Electrodermal responses to discrete stimuli measured by skin conductance, skin potential, and skin susceptance. Skin Res Technol. 2018; 24: 108–116.
https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12397 - Martinsen ØG, Kalvøy H, Bari DS, Tronstad C. A circuit for simultaneous measurements of skin electrical conductance, susceptance, and potential. J Electr Bioimpedance. 2019; 10: 110–112.
https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2019-0016 - Clar E, Her C, Sturelle C. Skin impedance and moisturization. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1975; 26: 337–353.
- Edelberg R. Electrical activity of the skin: Its measurement and uses in psychophysiology. In: Greenfield NS, Stembach RA, editors. Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston; 1972. p. 367–418.
- Martinsen ØG, Grimnes S, Nilsen JK, Tronstad C, Jang W, Kim H, et al. Gravimetric method for in vitro calibration of skin hydration measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008; 55(2): 728–32.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.912651 - Purohit AP. Personality variables, sex-difference, GSR responsiveness and GSR conditioning. J Exp Res Pers. 1966; 1: 166–173.
- Edelberg R. Biopotentials from the skin surface: The hydration effect. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1968; 148: 252–262.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb20353.x