Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

AUC values for testing sets from 10 repeated two-fold cross validation runs with three logistic regression models
| Repetitions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.9127 | 0.9160 | 0.9165 |
| 2 | 0.9177 | 0.9178 | 0.9190 |
| 3 | 0.9013 | 0.9034 | 0.9045 |
| 4 | 0.9165 | 0.9210 | 0.9238 |
| 5 | 0.8830 | 0.8840 | 0.8858 |
| 6 | 0.9206 | 0.9222 | 0.9230 |
| 7 | 0.9164 | 0.9165 | 0.9172 |
| 8 | 0.9053 | 0.9061 | 0.9075 |
| 9 | 0.9122 | 0.9146 | 0.9155 |
| 10 | 0.9181 | 0.9215 | 0.9222 |
| Mean AUC | 0.9104 | 0.9123 | 0.9135 |
Mean AUC values from 100 5-fold cross validation runs with linear logistic regression models
| Feature combinations | Mean AUC | Feature combinations | Mean AUC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5870 | 0.5723 | ||
| 0.5777 | 0.5716 | ||
| 0.5745 | 0.5715 | ||
| 0.5744 | 0.5686 | ||
| 0.5736 | 0.5678 |
p-values from MANOVA using EIS data taken from 1704 women for HG CIN detection
| Feature combinations | p-values | Feature combinations | p-values |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1003 × 10−31 | 5.0124 × 10−31 | ||
| 1.5861 × 10−31 | 5.3276 × 10−31 | ||
| 2.6287 × 10−31 | 6.5955 × 10−31 | ||
| 3.1665 × 10−31 | 7.2683 × 10−31 | ||
| 3.4687 × 10−31 | 7.4318 × 10−31 |
Mean AUC values from 100 5-fold cross validation runs with nonlinear logistic regression models
| Feature combinations | Mean AUC | Feature combinations | Mean AUC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6103 | 0.5911 | ||
| 0.5992 | 0.5899 | ||
| 0.5989 | 0.5895 | ||
| 0.5946 | 0.5891 | ||
| 0.5939 | 0.5885 |
Regression coefficient estimates and the associated p-values for the final logistic regression model
| β | estimates | p-values |
|---|---|---|
| βo | -2.9619 | 3.9518 × 10−32 |
| β1 | −7.4684 × 10−11 | 0.0047 |
| β2 | 3.3987 | 0.0090 |
| β1 | 3.0025 × 10−11 | 0.0044 |
| βCI | 2.3621 | 3.9281 × 10−47 |
| βRef | 2.2241 | 5.8068 × 10−35 |
Classification performance comparison between the new classifier developed and the previous classifiers
| Classifier | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic regression | 0.628 | 45.714% | 82.022% |
| Impedance at 152Hz | 0.621 | 38.7% | 83.4% |
| Slope (between 1.22 | 0.596 | 45.2% | 70.1% |
| and 2.44kHz) as α |
p-values from MANOVA using EIS data taken at initial colposcopy of 569 women for evaluation of prognostic value of EIS
| Feature combinations | p-values | Feature combinations | p-values |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0168 | 0.0286 | ||
| 0.0231 | 0.0295 | ||
| 0.0256 | 0.0296 | ||
| 0.0274 | 0.0314 | ||
| 0.0275 | 0.0335 |