Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Age-related differences in the morphology of the impedance cardiography signal

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Aria S, Elfarri Y, Elvegård M, Gottfridsson A, Grønaas HS, et al. Measuring Blood Pulse Wave Velocity with Bioimpedance in Different Age Groups. Sensors 2019, 19, 4, 850 https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040850
  2. Attia ZI, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, Asirvatham SJ, Deshmukh AJ, et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. The Lancet. 2019, 394, 10201, P861-867 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31721-0
  3. Benouar S, Hafid A, Attari M, Kedir-Talha M, Seoane F. Systematic variability in ICG recordings results in ICG complex subtypes – steps towards the enhancement of ICG characterization, J Electr Bioimp 2018, 9, 72–82 https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2018-0012
  4. Bernstein DP. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit Care Med. 1986, 14, 10, 904–909. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198610000-00017
  5. Bernstein DP. Impedance cardiography: Pulsatile blood flow and the biophysical and electrodynamic basis for the stroke volume equations. J Electr Bioimp 2009, 1,1, 2–17 https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.51
  6. Bernstein DP. Impedance cardiography: Pulsatile blood flow and the biophysical and electrodynamic basis for the stroke volume equations. J Electr Bioimp 2010, 1, 1, 2–17 https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.51
  7. Bouza E, Alvarado N, Alcalá L, Pérez MJ, Rincón C, Muñoz P, . A randomized and prospective study of 3 procedures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter withdrawal. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 44, 6, 820–826 https://doi.org/10.1086/511865
  8. Carvalho P, Paiva RP, Henriques J, Antunes M, Quintal I, Muehlsteff J. Robust Characteristic Points for ICG - Definition and Comparative Analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Bio-inspired Systems and Signal Processing, Rome, Italy, 26–29 January, 2011
  9. Chai P, Mohiaddin R. How we perform cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow assessment using phase-contrast velocity mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005, 7, 4, 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1081/jcmr-65639
  10. Cybulski G. Impedance Cardiography. In: Ambulatory Impedance Cardiography. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 76. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011
  11. Drazner M, Thompson B, Rosenberg PB, Kaiser PA, Boehrer JD, Baldwin BJ, Dries DL, Yancy CW, Comparison of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol, 2002, 89, 8, 993–995
  12. Ermishkin VV, Kolesnikov VA, Lukoshkova EV, Mokh VP, Sonina RS, Dupik NV, Boitsov SA. Variable impedance cardiography waveforms: how to evaluate the preejection period more accurately. J Phys Conf Ser 407, 2012, 012016 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/407/1/012016
  13. Ermishkin VV, Kolesnikov VA, Lukoshkova EV. Age-dependent and 'pathologic' changes in ICG waveforms resulting from superposition of pre-ejection and ejection waves. Physiol Meas, 2014, 35, 6, 943–63 https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/35/6/943
  14. Fegler G. Measurement of cardiac output in anesthetized animals by a thermo-dilution method. Q J Exp Physiol, 1954, 39, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.1954.sp001067
  15. Gershengorn HB, Wunsch H. Understanding changes in established practice: pulmonary artery catheter use in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2013, 41, 12, 2667–76 https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318298a41e
  16. Josteen A, Desebbe O, Suehiro K, Murphy LSL, Essiet M et al.. Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac outputmonitoring devices in perioperative medicine: asystematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth, 2017, 118, 3, 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew461
  17. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med. 1966, 37,12, 1208–1212
  18. Li J, Sun J, Song Y, Zhao J. Accelerating MRI reconstruction via three-dimensional dual-dictionary learning using CUDA. J Supercomput 2015, 71, 10, 2381–2396 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1386-z
  19. Liñares J. Diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection: conservative techniques. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 44, 6, 827–829 https://doi.org/10.1086/511885
  20. Mansouri S, Alhadidi T, Chabchoub S, Ben Salah R. Impedance cardiography: recent applications and developments. Biomed Research, 2018, 29, 19, 3542–3552 https://doi.org/10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-17-3479
  21. Medina-Lezama J, Narvaez-Guerra O, Herrera-Enriquez K, Morey-Vargas OL, Bolaños-SalazarJF et al. Hemodynamic Patterns Identified by Impedance Cardiography Predict Mortality in the General Population: The PREVENCION Study J Am Heart Assoc. 2018, 7, 18 https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009259
  22. Pan J, Tompkins WJ. A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985, BME-32, 230–236 https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1985.325532
  23. Sakka SG. Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill patient – current status and perspective. Front Med. 2015, 2, 44, 1–6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2015.00044
  24. Sramek BB, Rose DM, Miyamoto A. Stroke volume equation with a linear base impedance model and its accuracy, as compared to thermodilution and magnetic flowmeter techniques in humans and animals. Paper presented at: The 6th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance, Zadar, Yugoslavia, 1983, 38
  25. Sun Z. Aging, Arterial Stiffness and Hypertension. Hypertension. 2015, 65, 2, 252–256 https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03617
  26. Thiele RH, Bartels K, Gan TJ. Cardiac output monitoring, a contemporary assessment and review. Crit Care Med. 2015, 43, 1, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000608
  27. Van De Water JM, Miller TW, Vogel RL, Mount BE, Dalton ML. Impedance cardiography, the next vital sign technology. Chest. 2003, 123, 6, 2028–2033. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.6.2028
  28. Van Eijnatten MAJM, van Rijssel MJ, Peters RJA, Verdaasdonk RM, Meijer JH. Comparison of cardiac time intervals between echocardiography and impedance cardiography at various heart rates. J Electr Bioimp. 2014, 5, 2–8
  29. Vincent JL, Pinsky MR, Sprung CL, Levy M, Marini JJ, Payen D, et al. The pulmonary artery catheter: in medio virtus. Crit Care Med. 2008, 36, 11, 3093–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818c10c7
  30. Young DW. What does an MRI scan cost? Healthc Financ Manage 2015, 69, 11, 46–49 https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9784.1000.167
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 145
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2019
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: University of Oslo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2019 Christian Tronstad, Jan Olav Høgetveit, Ole Elvebakk, Håvard Kalvøy, published by University of Oslo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.