Fig.1

Fig.2
![Relationship of relative changes in different BIS parameters estimated on basis of pre-HD and post-HD values from kkBIS and whBIS methods. The relative changes were calculated as (|pre-HD – post-HD|)/pre-HD x 100 for (a) ΔRe (%), (b) ΔRe/UFV (%/L), (c) ΔECF (%) and (d) ΔECF (%) according to [15, 16]. Each patient has two entries.](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64721e3e215d2f6c89dbc8fe/j_joeb-2019-0008_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKHQBRQUXV%2F20260320%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260320T133331Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEGwaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJGMEQCIEoXmSwpibts6VbJKH1X8QFZL6P2Lyjf7Z0Z3dj36CY6AiBnAXBC1UULBB%2BwymGYnEFJSGUPgU7RyFVemjvSGYA90iq8BQg1EAIaDDk2MzEzNDI4OTk0MCIMFrguYVxk2bjDcdafKpkFY3TqU2fX3l6BZ4HVoOeGAervQ%2FzfMOJu46bLheuzgn5MLzWNI9VRfKV%2FGuQq2xX838xFDIzP%2FTUUIYz008DRM5vgEtdN3fHfhN6t%2FN3ERSKROj8v%2B9HYaTMHLoY9e1hIaHALoyErt0hPoqj9qZdEWgvVB0z8dODCsh%2FQ28Oq4u8vA2iObvUxqzuK8S%2BKyHnVKNr7CUnI1eXOxY7wTNME0kiaUBc3vuTE8hQSDkmzwuazUkX74e47M%2B%2FZ%2BmuiQufUWslFbfk9Tmj4lZ4dI8bmDkgxISvhVHqTgQmKpB9jv6lIZoaEVui8poWw6VF9%2F5uSAYZ5kzq%2BYKgfqfgc91SHSHBV7iiLlJzPSwKmEjVvJczBLlMC0Zn0wXFSoM5hxcqJBiJ3%2B2VdAvd7sydkJhPTHcNik72IOk4I7vyOzT%2B5l3IVFk4KRxnpf%2BDjKnv6a%2FBjz19GILAwa2VFW4BcV9LUwub3eXfOGUguynFn%2FwjMdaOkk9N61o7H0Vsif1NAR9flGG1bdcimxASoGYW40xjyciDqVXytF6oIyqvDuUCSDf6%2FsA8%2BALJkjWJ7oNkbG%2FtVjIA1bs4kgpgfsrJl7FUvufWU0wD8t4kA2P70ly0h5LhxnHpSX5mf8wgaLWwKrtwdajXXnkiUnwx4E5nUIvc9UnQqUNb1S9P0EPfPMcKlKnxN1kbjMeBT9LeJuxVzDSVH0ii4VHMFtCkTabPE0iaTCZQKTH2imNwUPgSySHuiT02Nd7Wns8vTE91LxIXKwpD4p6EjAz30B7kcNkMZQ0zFMkVcAgsrRiMHez%2FZSqgkdjZZEJKsXlxxFJuMPCNJIhYeAhKTky6wxmeY3c2YHYYUXptOg3OQ67TYEjFaRh5SnRoaaBP%2BioXgFP4w4O%2F0zQY6sgG3UFhtLyPLmjDewdqinkbr9bUk%2BwN%2F1PHOTPBKUpmebw%2B8UupMYiJT26irvewTzK27RrUaWXAkKN3w12E6BRKpMjhd0lCW8oIMwSBzDybNP9sefUnR6oHSsyKTML5oFX8FiEf%2FixkZmBRGBZMgjLkISr13UM7HZVPvIjA%2FguTU8GN4DMOM1%2BSgQrKVnKQF6ozdiuBUi8DP556gU72bFwC1XOEbrobtthzC6vBWkCJrgm3Q&X-Amz-Signature=f7481bf49a71e19cceab7e5b1de5a5c01a1aa56615435e70beb7edad2d4704f2&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Pre-dialysis physical and clinical characteristics_ Data are means ± SD from 20 patients (40 measurements)_
| Baseline Characteristics | Hemodialysispatients | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stable (n = 10) | Unstable (n = 10) | p | |
| Gender, % female | 20.0 | 50.0 | 0.350 |
| Age, years | 63.3 ± 15.8 | 60.7 ± 16.4 | 0.722 |
| Height, cm | 174.7 ± 7.9 | 165.8 ± 9.0 | 0.030 |
| Weight, kg | 83.6 ± 8.3 | 69.5 ± 17.3 | 0.038 |
| BMI, Kg / m2 | 27.5 ± 3.4 | 25.4 ± 6.8 | 0.398 |
| Dialysis duration, min | 234.0 ± 19.0 | 222.0 ± 29.0 | 0.290 |
| Ultrafiltration Rate, ml / h | 557.5 ± 305.7 | 564.2 ± 235.1 | 0.957 |
| UFV, mL | 2252.0 ± 1226.9 | 2300.0 ± 1091.4 | 0.927 |
| SysBP, mmHg | 123.7 ± 17.2 | 125.4 ± 19.1 | 0.836 |
| DiaBP, mmHf | 71.5 ± 14.6 | 64.1 ± 11.6 | 0.226 |
| ECFwhBIS, L | 21.6 ± 2.4 | 17.3 ± 3.9 | 0.009 |
| ECFkkBIS, L | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 0.769 |
| Body temperature, °C | 36.0 ± 0.6 | 35.9 ± 0.4 | 0.688 |
| O2 saturation, % | 96.9 ± 2.4 | 96.6 ± 2.7 | 0.796 |
| Plasma Na+, mmol / L | 136.8 ± 2.1 | 136.7 ± 2.7 | 0.928 |
| Plasma K+, mmol / L | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.7 ± 1.0 | 0.530 |
| Plasma ionized Ca2+, mmol / L | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.461 |
| Plasma glucose, mmol / L | 121.4 ± 27.8 | 124.6 ± 31.3 | 0.809 |