Fig.1

Fig.2
![Relationship of relative changes in different BIS parameters estimated on basis of pre-HD and post-HD values from kkBIS and whBIS methods. The relative changes were calculated as (|pre-HD – post-HD|)/pre-HD x 100 for (a) ΔRe (%), (b) ΔRe/UFV (%/L), (c) ΔECF (%) and (d) ΔECF (%) according to [15, 16]. Each patient has two entries.](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64721e3e215d2f6c89dbc8fe/j_joeb-2019-0008_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251023%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251023T133011Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=fa95c85df62d99937528d19728ac0a765cecb3466e68136c8c31c7ba94f61aef&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Pre-dialysis physical and clinical characteristics_ Data are means ± SD from 20 patients (40 measurements)_
Baseline Characteristics | Hemodialysispatients | ||
---|---|---|---|
Stable (n = 10) | Unstable (n = 10) | p | |
Gender, % female | 20.0 | 50.0 | 0.350 |
Age, years | 63.3 ± 15.8 | 60.7 ± 16.4 | 0.722 |
Height, cm | 174.7 ± 7.9 | 165.8 ± 9.0 | 0.030 |
Weight, kg | 83.6 ± 8.3 | 69.5 ± 17.3 | 0.038 |
BMI, Kg / m2 | 27.5 ± 3.4 | 25.4 ± 6.8 | 0.398 |
Dialysis duration, min | 234.0 ± 19.0 | 222.0 ± 29.0 | 0.290 |
Ultrafiltration Rate, ml / h | 557.5 ± 305.7 | 564.2 ± 235.1 | 0.957 |
UFV, mL | 2252.0 ± 1226.9 | 2300.0 ± 1091.4 | 0.927 |
SysBP, mmHg | 123.7 ± 17.2 | 125.4 ± 19.1 | 0.836 |
DiaBP, mmHf | 71.5 ± 14.6 | 64.1 ± 11.6 | 0.226 |
ECFwhBIS, L | 21.6 ± 2.4 | 17.3 ± 3.9 | 0.009 |
ECFkkBIS, L | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 0.769 |
Body temperature, °C | 36.0 ± 0.6 | 35.9 ± 0.4 | 0.688 |
O2 saturation, % | 96.9 ± 2.4 | 96.6 ± 2.7 | 0.796 |
Plasma Na+, mmol / L | 136.8 ± 2.1 | 136.7 ± 2.7 | 0.928 |
Plasma K+, mmol / L | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.7 ± 1.0 | 0.530 |
Plasma ionized Ca2+, mmol / L | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.461 |
Plasma glucose, mmol / L | 121.4 ± 27.8 | 124.6 ± 31.3 | 0.809 |