
Fig. 1
Lungs Classification to four regions.

Fig. 2
Electrical Impedance Tomography of lung’s four regions.

Fig. 3
Phase space mapping.

Fig. 4
A phase space mapping for suitable lung volume.

Fig. 5
A phase space mapping for unsuitable lung volume.
Table 1
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 1.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± Standard deviation | Mean ± Standard deviation | |
| Unacceptable | 89.23 ± 10.45 | 1914.71 ± 203.61 |
| Suitable | 94.43 ± 11.76 | 11673.52± 174.11 |
Table 2
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 2.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± Standard deviation | Mean ± Standard deviation | |
| Unacceptable | 96.51 ± 12.10 | 2104.23 ± 223.25 |
| Suitable | 112.67 ± 24.09 | 1716.06± 213.43 |
Table 3
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 3.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± Standard deviation | Mean ± Standard deviation | |
| Unacceptable | 118.19 ± 15.75 | 2217.25 ± 228.51 |
| Suitable | 158.09 ± 34.12 | 1835.12± 216.41 |
Table 4
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 4.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± Standard deviation | Mean ± Standard deviation | |
| Unacceptable | 132.54 ± 21/14 | 2375.78 ± 234.01 |
| Suitable | 216.37 ± 41/62 | 1932.64± 220.17 |
Table 5
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 5.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± Standard deviation | Mean ± Standard deviation | |
| Unacceptable | 148.20 ± 24.17 | 2418.23 ± 239.67 |
| Suitable | 297.41 ± 49.25 | 2098.27 ± 226.15 |
Table 6
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 6.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± Standard deviation | Mean ± Standard deviation | |
| Unacceptable | 156.71 ± 26.01 | 2457.98 ± 245.54 |
| Suitable | 342.32 ± 57.75 | 2113.18 ± 230.67 |

Fig 6
Comparison of the SD1 parameter for different value of the τ.

Fig. 7
Comparison of the SD2 parameter for different value of the τ.