Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Archives: How Western Newspapers Frame Our Remembrance of the Gezi Park Protest Cover

Digital Archives: How Western Newspapers Frame Our Remembrance of the Gezi Park Protest

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Aptekar, S. (2017). Looking forward, looking back: Collective memory and neighbourhood identity in two urban parks. Symbolic Interaction, 40(1), 101–121. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/SYMB.271" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/SYMB.271</a>
  2. Arango, T. (2013, June 14). Turkish protesters say talks with premier lead to a tentative agreement. The New York Times.
  3. Arango, T. & Yeginsu, C. (2013a, June 5). Park defender helped set off Turkey’s crisis. The New York Times.
  4. Arango, T. & Yeginsu, C. (2013b, November 15). Turkey moves to silence dissenters, but with one eye on its image abroad. The New York Times.
  5. Arsu, S. (2013a, June 6). Protest group gives Turkish official a list of demands. The New York Times.
  6. Arsu, S. (2013b, June 15). The music started, and the protest paused. The New York Times.
  7. Assmann, A. (2001). History and memory. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 6822–6829). Pergamon.
  8. Baydar, Y. (2013, July 21). How media bosses undermine democracy. The New York Times.
  9. Beaumont, P. (2013, June 15). Turkish protesters vow to remain in Gezi Park despite. The Guardian.
  10. Benhabib, S. (2013, June 4). Turkey’s authoritarian turn. The New York Times.
  11. Bitzer, L. (1968). The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 25, 1–14.
  12. Blair, C., Dickinson, G., & Ott, B. L. (2010). Introduction: Rhetoric/memory/place. In G. Dickinson, C. Blair, & B. L. Ott, Places of public memory: The rhetoric of museums and memorials (pp. 1–54). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
  13. Brüggemann, M. (2014). Between frame setting and frame sending: How journalists contribute to news frames. Communication Theory, 24(1), 61–82.
  14. Burke, K. (1984). Attitudes toward history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  15. Camaj, L. (2010). Media framing through stages of a political discourse: International news agencies’ coverage of Kosovo’s status negotiations. International Communication Gazette, 72(7), 635–653
  16. Cohen, R. (2013, June 25). From ‘No’ to ‘Go’. The New York Times.
  17. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review Of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054</a>
  18. Chrona, S. & Bee, C. (2017). Right to public space and right to democracy: The role of social media in Gezi Park, Research and Policy on Turkey, 2:1,49–61, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/23760818.2016.1272267" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/23760818.2016.1272267</a>
  19. Donadio, R. (2014, November 19). In Turkey, the arts flourish, but warily. The New York Times.
  20. Edwards, J. A. (2009). Navigating the post-cold war world: President Clinton’s foreign policy rhetoric. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  21. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58
  22. Gavilanes, R.G., Mollgaard, A., Tsvetkova, M., & Yasseri, T. (2016). Memory remains: Understanding collective memory in the digital age. Science Advances, 3(4), 1–9.
  23. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
  24. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
  25. Goldman, R. (2019, October 10). Kurds, Turkey and the U.S.: 5 years of tension, alliances and conflict. The New York Times.
  26. Gladstone, R. (2013, July 13). Rights groups accuse Turkish police of excessive force against protesters. The New York Times.
  27. Hansen, S. (2014, February 9). Whose Turkey is it? The New York Times.
  28. Harding, L. (2013a, June 8). International: Turkish protest: The activists: From a row over a park to a protest over a country’s direction of travel. The Guardian.
  29. Harding, L. (2013b, June 5). Turkish protests: Crackdown ‘wrong and unjust’, says deputy PM: Move to ease tension in absence of Erdogan, Demonstrators and police make conciliatory noises. The Guardian.
  30. Harding, L. (2013c, June 10). Turkish protesters embrace Erdogan insult and starting capuling craze. The Guardian.
  31. Hoenisch, S. (2009). The Theory and Method of Topical Structure Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.criticism.com/da/tsa-method.php
  32. Jalabi, R. (2013, June 3). Turkish protesters raise $55,000 for full-page ad in New York Times. The Guardian.
  33. Jenkins, S. (2013, June 12). Comment: It’s the street not the screen where the real politics lives: Forget Field Marshal Twitter. From Trafalgar to Taksim, what terrifies our rulers are the wild squadrons of the square. The Guardian.
  34. Kuypers, J. A. (2002). Press bias and politics: How the media frame controversial issues. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  35. Kuypers, J. A., & Cooper, S. (2005). A comparative framing analysis of embedded and behind-the-lines reporting on the 2003 Iraq War. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 6, 1–10.
  36. Kuypers, J. A. (Ed.) (2009). Rhetorical criticism: Perspectives in action. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.
  37. Kuypers, J. A. (2010). Framing analysis from a rhetorical perspective. In P. D’Angelo and J. Kuypers, Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theorical perspectives (pp. 265–85). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  38. Kimmelman, M. (2013, June 8). In Istanbul’s heart, leader’s obsession, perhaps Achilles’ heel. The New York Times.
  39. Kimmelman, M. (2014, September 7). Refugees reshape their camp, at the risk of feeling at home. The New York Times.
  40. Lautamatti, L. (1978). Observations on the development of the topic in simplified discourse. In V. Kohonen & N.E. Enkvist (eds.), Text linguistics, cognitive learning and language teaching. Turku, Finland: Afinla, 1978.
  41. Licata, L. & Mercy, A. (2015). Collective memory, social psychology of. In J. D. Wright, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 194–199). Oxford: Elsevier.
  42. Linke, U. (2015). Collective memory, anthropology of. In J. D. Wright, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 181–187). Oxford: Elsevier.
  43. Lipsitz, G. (1990). Preface. In G. Lipsitz, Time passages: Collective memory and American popular culture (pp. vii–xvii). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  44. Martinez, L. (2013). Gezi Park Protests show Erdogan’s Control over Mainstream Media in Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.media-diversity.org/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2539:gezi-park-protests-highlight-how-mainstream-media-in-turkey-is-bound-up-with-erdogans-government&catid=35:media-news-a-content&Itemid=34.
  45. Melki, J. (2014). The interplay of politics, economics and culture in news framing of Middle East wars. Media, War and Conflict, 7(2), 165–186.
  46. Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representation, 26, 7–24. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/2928520</a>
  47. Odabaş, M. & Reynolds-Stenson, H. (2018). Tweeting from Gezi Park: Social media and repression backfire. Social Currents, 5(4), 386–406
  48. Ott, B.L. & Aoki, E. (2002). The politics of negotiating public tragedy: Media framing of the Matthew Shepard murder. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 5, 483–505.
  49. Oz, M. (2016). Mainstream media’s coverage of the Gezi protests and protesters’ perception of mainstream media. Global Media and Communication, 12(2), 177–192.
  50. Phillips, K. (2004). Introduction. In K. Phillips (ed.), Framing public memory (pp. 1–14). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
  51. Seckinelgin, H. (2016). Social policy and conflict: the Gezi Park–Taksim demonstrations and uses of social policy for reimagining Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(2), 264–280
  52. Shafak, E. (2013, June 4). G2: The view from Taksim Square: The protests in Turkey started as a sit-in to save one of Istanbul’s last public parks. They have since become a barometer of the country’s discontent with its government. But how closely do they mirror events elsewhere in the Muslim world? The Guardian.
  53. Temelkuran, E. (2016, July 3). Washing away the blood. The New York Times, pp. 2.
  54. Top 10 U.S. Daily Newspapers. Cision Media Research, Chicago. (2019, January 4). Retrieved from https://www.cision.com/us/2019/01/top-ten-us-daily-newspapers/
  55. Turkey election: Erdogan wins re-election as president. (2018, June 28). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44596072.
  56. Urquhart, C. (2013, June 1). Turkey protests rage for second day. The Guardian
  57. Valenzano, J. M., III. (2009). Framing the war on terror in Canadian newspapers: Cascading activation, Canadian leaders and newspapers. Southern Communication Journal, 74, 174–190.
  58. Whitehead, C. & Bozoğlu, G. (2016). Protest, bodies, and the grounds of memory: Taksim Square as ‘heritage site’ and the 2013 Gezi Protests. Heritage & Society, 9(2), 111–136, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1301084" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/2159032X.2017.1301084</a>
Language: English
Page range: 123 - 144
Published on: Dec 31, 2023
Published by: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2023 Nihar Sreepada, Ahmet Aksoy, published by Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.