References
- Abdulrazaq, Tallha, and Gareth Stansfield. 2016. “The Enemy within: ISIS and the Conquest of Mosul.” Middle East Journal 70 (4): 525–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26427457.
- Abu Rumman, Muhammad. 2020. The Future of ISIS: Strengths and Weaknesses: Dynamics of the ‘Virtual Caliphate’ and the Gap in Counterterrorism Strategies. Amman: Friedrich Ebert Foundation. https://jordan.fes.de/publications/publications-on-political-islam/publications-on-political-islam-in-english.
- Adang, Camilla, Hassan Ansari, Maribel Fierro, and Sabine Schmidtke. 2016. Accusations of Unbelief in Islam: A Diachronic Perspective on Takfir. Leiden, Tthe Netherlands: Brill.
- Birdsell, Brian. 2014. “Fauconnier’s Theory of Mental Spaces and Conceptual Blending.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Jeannette Littlemore, and John R. Taylor, 72–90. London: Bloomsbury. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472593689.ch-005.
- Bruce, Gregor. 2013. “Definition of Terrorism: Social and Political Effects.” Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health 21 (2): 26–30.
- Bunzel, Cole. 2016. The Kingdom and The Caliphate: Duel of The Islamic States. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2016/02/18/kingdom-and-caliphate-duel-of-islamic-states-pub-62810.
- Bunzel, Cole. 2019. “Ideological Infighting in the Islamic State.” Perspectives on Terrorism 13 (1): 12–21.
- Chen, Ronald Y. 2018. The Death of Muath Al-Kasasbeh: The Politics of Mourning, Memory, Identity, & Power. Emirates NBD Essay. https://mei.nus.edu.sg/publication/emirates-nbd-essay-2016-the-death-of-muath-al-kasasbeh-the-politics-of-mourning-memory-identity-power/.
- Chilton, Paul. 1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.
- Croft, William, and Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Fairclough, Norman. 1993. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Oxon: Routledge.
- Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 1998. “Conceptual Integration Networks.” Cognitive Science 22 (2): 133–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80038-X.
- Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and The Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
- Fillmore, Charles. 1985. “Frames and The Semantics of Understanding”. Quaderni Di Semantica VI (2), 222–254.
- Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
- Gerges, Fawaz. 2014. “ISIS and the Third Wave of Jihadism.” Current History 113 (767): 339–43. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2014.113.767.339.
- Grady, Joseph, Todd Oakley, and Seana Coulson. 1999. “Blending and Metaphor.” In Metaphors in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Raymond Gibbs and Gerrard Steen, 101–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.07gra.
- Hitti, Philip. 1937. History of the Arabs. London: Macmillan.
- Jackson, Richard. 2005. “The Politics of Threat and Danger: Writing the War on Terrorism.” Democracy and Security 1, 147–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17419160500322517.
- Jackson, Sherman. 2002. On the Boundaries of Theological Tolerance in Islam: Abu Hamid al-Ghazali’s Faysal al-Tafriqa Bayna al-Islam wa al-Zandaqa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kenney, Jeffrey. 2006. Muslim Rebels: Kharijites and the Politics of Extremism in Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Koch, Ariel. 2018. “Jihadi Beheading Videos and Their Non-Jihadi Echoes.” Perspectives on Terrorism, 12 (3): 24–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26453133.
- Kumar, Sanjeev. 2018. “ISIS and the Sectarian Political Ontology: Radical Islam, Violent Jihadism and the Claims for Revival of the Caliphate.” India Quarterly 74 (2):119–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0974928418766683.
- Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lee, McClung, and Elisabeth Bryant Lee, eds. 1939. The Fine Art of Propaganda: A Study of Father Coughlin’s Speeches. New York: Harcourt Brace.
- McInnis, Kathleen. 2017. “Coalition Contributions to Countering the Islamic State.” Journal of Current Politics and Economics of the Middle East 8 (3): 253–70. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/R44135.pdf.
- Neisser, Ulric, and Robyn Fivush. 1994. The Remembering Self: Construction and Accuracy in the Self-Narrative. Emory Symposia in Cognition, no. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752858.
- Schlesinger, Kyle. 2010. “Long-Term Memories: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” American Book Review 31 (2): 10–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/abr.0.0060.
- Shehadah, Marwan. 2018. “Policy Paper: The Effectiveness of Social Networks and Sleeper Cells of Salafism in Jordan.” Amman, Jordan: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Jordan & Iraq. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/amman/14084.pdf.
- Stern, Jessica, and J. M. Berger. 2015. ISIS: The State of Terror. London: William Collins.
- Surour, Zine El-Abidine. 2012. The Kharijites of This Age. London: Dar Al-Jabiya.
- Timani, Hussam. 2008. Modern Intellectual Readings of The Kharijites. New York: Peter Lang.
- van Dijk, Teun. 1995a. “Power and the News Media.” In Political Communication and Action, edited by David L. Paletz, 9–36. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
- van Dijk, Teun. 1995b. “The Mass Media Today: Discourses of Domination or Diversity?” Javnost: The Public 2 (2): 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.1995.11008592.
- van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
- van Dijk, Teun. 2001. “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 95–120. New York: Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n5.
- van Dijk, Teun. 2006. “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse & Society 17 (3): 359–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250.
- van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005.
- Weiss, Michael, and Hassan Hassan. 2015. ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror. New York: Regan Arts.
- Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “What CDA Is About: A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts, and Its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1–13. New York: Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n1.