Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Online Comments as a Tool of Intercultural (Russian–Czech) “Anti-Dialog” Cover

Online Comments as a Tool of Intercultural (Russian–Czech) “Anti-Dialog”

By: Jiří Gazda  
Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. Davis, Kathryn A. 1995. “Qualitative Theory and Methods in Applied Linguistics Research.” TESOL Quarterly 29 (3): 427–53.
  2. Dubrovskiy, Dmitriy, and Oksana Karpenko. 2003. Yazyk vrazhdy v russkoyazychnom Internete: materialy issledovaniya po opoznavaniyu tekstov nenavisti. [The Language of Hatred in the Russian-Speaking Internet: Study on Recognition of Texts of Hate]. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelstvo Evropeyskogo Universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge.
  3. Dzyaloshinskiy, Iosif. 2006. Yazyk vrazhdy v rossiyskikh SMI: sotsialnyye, kulturnyye, professionalnyye faktory. [The Language of Hatred in the Russian Media: Social, Cultural, Professional Factors]. Moscow: Gumanitarnyy Institut.
  4. Kara-Murza, Sergey. 2000. Manipulyatsiya soznaniyem. [Manipulation with Consciousness]. Moscow: Algoritm.
  5. Konnikova, Maria. 2013. “The Psychology of Online Comments.” The New Yorker. October 23. http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/the-psychology-of-online-comments.
  6. Korepanova, Elena. 2007. “Psikhologicheskiye kharakteristiki dialoga v pedagogicheskoy deyatelnosti.” [Psychological Characteristics of Dialogue in Pedagogical Activities]. Vestnik TGU 3 (47): 152.
  7. Lazaraton, Anne. 2003. “Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: Whose Criteria and Whose Research?” The Modern Language Journal 87 (1): 1–12.
  8. Orgoňová, Olga, and Alena Bohunická. 2016. “Imigrácia ako predmet xenoslovakistiky a kritickej analýzy diskurzu na Slovensku.” [Immigration as a Subject of Xenoslovak Studies and of Critical Discourse Analysis in Slovakia]. Jazyk a politika. Na pomedzí lingvistiky a politológie [Language and Politics. Between Linguistics and Political Science], edited by Radoslav Štefančík, 79–93. Bratislava: EKONÓM.
  9. Petrova, Nataliya, and Larisa Ratsiburskaya. 2011. Yazyk sovremennykh SMI: sredstva rechevoy agressii. [The Language of Modern Media: Means of Verbal Aggression]. Moscow: Flinta, Nauka.
  10. Richardson, John E., and Monica Colombo. 2012. “National Identity and Insecurity in Anti-Immigrant Discourse: An Analysis of the Visual Propaganda of the Front National.” In Le discours et la langue: Revue de linguistique française et d’analyse du discours 3 (1): 119–36.
  11. Skovorodnikov, Aleksandr. 1997. “Yazykovoye nasiliye v sovremennoy rossiyskoy presse. [Linguistic Violence in Contemporary Russian Print Media].” In Teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye aspekty rechevogo obshcheniya: nauchno-metodicheskiy byulleten, Vyp. 2. [Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Verbal Communication: scientific-methodical bulletin, Vol. 2], edited by Aleksandr Skovorodnikov, 10–15. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet.
  12. Suler, John. 2004. “The Online Disinhibition Effect.” Cyberpsychology and Behaviour 7 (3): 321–6.
  13. Van Dijk, Teun A. 1991. “The Interdisciplinary Study of News as Discourse.” In A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research, edited by Klaus Bruhn Jensen and Nicholas W. Jankowski, 108–20. London: Routledge.
  14. Van Dijk, Teun A., ed. 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process (Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 1). London: Sage.
  15. Van Dijk, Teun A. 2002. “Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage.
  16. Van Dijk, Teun A. 2005. “Opinions and Ideologies in the Press.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, edited by Allan Bell and Peter Garret, 21–63. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  17. Van Dijk, Teun A. 2008. Discourse and Power. Contributions to Critical Discourse Studies. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
  18. Vargolskaya, Virdzhiniya. 2016. “Razgovor napryamuyu – Cheshskiy Internet: gde zakanchi-vayetsya svoboda slova I nachinayetsya ‘yazyk vrazhdy’?” [Conversation Directly – Czech Internet: Where Freedom of Speech Ends and Starts the “Language of Hatred”?]. Czech Radio 7, Radio Prague. April 1. http://www.radio.cz/ru/rubrika/razgovor/cheshskij-internet-gde-zakanchivaetsya-svoboda-slova-i-nachinaetsya-yazyk-vrazhdy.
  19. Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “The Contribution of Critical Linguistics to the Analysis of Discriminatory Prejudices and Stereotypes in the Language of Politics.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere (Handbook of Linguistics, Vol. 4), edited by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller, 291–316. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  20. Yevstaf’yeva, Anna. 2009. “Yazyk vrazhdy” v sredstvakh massovoy informatsii: lingvisticheskiy i ekstralingvisticheskiy faktory funktsionirovaniya. [The Language of Hatred in the Media: Linguistic and Extra-Linguistic Factors of Functioning]. Doctoral thesis. Togliatti: TGU. Abstract available at http://www.dslib.net/russkij-jazyk/jazyk-vrazhdy-v-sredstvah-masso-voj-informacii-lingvisticheskie-i.html.
Language: English
Page range: 100 - 120
Published on: Jul 30, 2018
Published by: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Jiří Gazda, published by Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.