Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Multi-Objective Solution of Green Vehicle Routing Problem Cover

A Multi-Objective Solution of Green Vehicle Routing Problem

Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges
Volume 10 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. 1. Dunning, J. H. (2014). The Globalization of Business (Routledge Revivals): The Challenge of the 1990s. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315743691
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Erdoğan, S. & Miller-Hooks, E. (2012). A green vehicle routing problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(1), 100-114.10.1016/j.tre.2011.08.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Koç, Ç. & Karaoglan, I. (2016). The green vehicle routing problem: A heuristic based exact solution approach. Applied Soft Computing, 39, 154-164.10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.064
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Bektaş, T. & Laporte, G. (2011). The pollution-routing problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45 (8), 1232-1250.10.1016/j.trb.2011.02.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Demir, E., Bektaş, T. & Laporte, G. (2012). An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the pollution-routing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 346-359.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.044
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Koç, Ç., Bektaş, T., Jabali, O. & Laporte, G. (2014). The fleet size and mix pollution-routing problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 70, 239-254.10.1016/j.trb.2014.09.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Demir, E., Bektaş, T. & Laporte, G. (2014). The bi-objective pollution-routing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), 464-478.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Laporte, G., Nobert, Y. & Taillefer, S. (1988). Solving a family of multi-depot vehicle routing and location-routing problems. Transportation Science, 22(3), 161-172.10.1287/trsc.22.3.161
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Detti, P., Papalini, F. & de Lara, G. Z. M. (2017). A multi-depot dial-a-ride problem with heterogeneous vehicles and compatibility constraints in healthcare. Omega, 70, 1-14.10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. Bae, H. & Moon, I. (2016). Multi-depot vehicle routing problem with time windows considering delivery and installation vehicles. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(13-14), 6536-6549.10.1016/j.apm.2016.01.059
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Sundar, K. & Rathinam, S. (2017). Algorithms for heterogeneous, multiple depot, multiple unmanned vehicle path planning problems. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 88(2-4), 513-526.10.1007/s10846-016-0458-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Crevier, B., Cordeau, J. F. & Laporte, G. (2007). The multi-depot vehicle routing problem with inter-depot routes. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(2), 756-773.10.1016/j.ejor.2005.08.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Cordeau, J.F. & Maischberger, M. (2012). A parallel iterated tabu search heuristic for vehicle routing problems. Computers & Operations Research, 39(9), 2033-2050.10.1016/j.cor.2011.09.021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Escobar, J. W., Linfati, R., Toth, P. & Baldoquin, M. G. (2014). A hybrid granular tabu search algorithm for the multi-depot vehicle routing problem. Journal of Heuristics, 20(5), 483-509.10.1007/s10732-014-9247-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Shimizu, Y. & Sakaguchi, T. (2014). A hierarchical hybrid meta-heuristic approach to coping with large practical multi-depot VRP. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 13(2), 163-171.10.7232/iems.2014.13.2.163
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Subramanian, A., Uchoa, E. & Ochi, L. S. (2013). A hybrid algorithm for a class of vehicle routing problems. Computers & Operations Research, 40(10), 2519-2531.10.1016/j.cor.2013.01.013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Savelsbergh, M. W. P. (1992). The vehicle routing problem with time windows: Minimizing route duration. ORSA Journal on Computing, 4(2), 146-154.10.1287/ijoc.4.2.146
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Desrochers, M., Desrosiers, J. D. & Solomon, M. (1992). A new optimization algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with time windows. Operations Research, 40(2), 342-354.10.1287/opre.40.2.342
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Ombuki, B., Ross, B. J. & Hanshar, F. (2006). Multi-objective genetic algorithms for vehicle routing problem with time windows. Applied Intelligence, 24(1), 17-30.10.1007/s10489-006-6926-z
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Taş, D., Dellaert, N., Van Woensel, T. & De Kok, T. (2013). Vehicle routing problem with stochastic travel times including soft time windows and service costs. Computers & Operations Research, 40(1), 214-224.10.1016/j.cor.2012.06.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. Angelelli, E. & Mansini, R. (2002). The vehicle routing problem with time windows and simultaneous pick-up and delivery. In Klose, A., Speranza, M. G. & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (Eds.), Quantitative approaches to distribution logistics and supply chain management (pp. 249-267). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-56183-2_15
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Leung, S. C. H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, D., Hua, X. & Lim, M. K. (2013). A meta-heuristic algorithm for heterogeneous fleet vehicle routing problems with two-dimensional loading constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(2), 199-210.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Jiang, J., Ng, K. M., Poh, K. L. & Teo, K. M. (2014). Vehicle routing problem with a heterogeneous fleet and time windows. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(8), 3748-3760.10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Belfiore, P. & Yoshizaki, H. T. Y. (2013). Heuristic methods for the fleet size and mix vehicle routing problem with time windows and split deliveries. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64(2), 589-601.10.1016/j.cie.2012.11.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. Jair, J., Paternina-Arboleda, C. D., Cantillo, V. & Montoya-Torres, J. R. (2013). A two-pheromone trail ant colony system—Tabu search approach for the heterogeneous vehicle routing problem with time windows and multiple products. Journal of Heuristics, 19(2), 233-252.10.1007/s10732-011-9184-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Baños, R. L., Ortega, J., Gil, C. N., Márquez, A. L. & De Toro, F. (2013). A hybrid meta-heuristic for multi-objective vehicle routing problems with time windows. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65(2), 286-296.10.1016/j.cie.2013.01.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. Guerriero, F., Surace, R., Loscri, V. & Natalizio, E. (2014). A multi-objective approach for unmanned aerial vehicle routing problem with soft time windows constraints. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(3), 839-852.10.1016/j.apm.2013.07.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jlst-2019-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2784-7497
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 44
Submitted on: Feb 23, 2019
Published on: Jun 28, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Index Terms: Green Vehicle Routing Problem,
Alternative Fuel Vehicles,
-Constraint,
Multi-Objective Optimization,
Pareto Optimality
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Business management, other,
Industries,
Transportation, logistics, air traffic, shipping,
Environmental management,
Business informatics,
Process management

© 2019 Özgür Kabadurmuş, Mehmet Serdar Erdoğan, Yiğitcan Özkan, Mertcan Köseoğlu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 10 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)Next article