Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Non-Compliance Provisions of Corporate Governance Codes: A Critical Analysis of the Laws of Mauritius and The United Kingdom Cover

The Non-Compliance Provisions of Corporate Governance Codes: A Critical Analysis of the Laws of Mauritius and The United Kingdom

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Aboagye, A. Q. Q., & Otieku, J. (2010). Are Ghanaian MFIs’ performance associated with corporate governance? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(3), 307-320.
  2. Aguilera, R. V., & Ruiz-Castillo, M. (2025). Toward an updated corporate governance framework: Fundamentals, disruptions, and future research. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 28(2), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444251320399
  3. Ali, M. I. (2020). Comparative legal research-building a legal attitude for a transnational world. Journal of Legal Studies, 26(40), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2020-0012
  4. Alobaidi, H. A., Kadhim, K., Raheem, A. A.-J., Jasim, J. K., & Nassar, W. (2025). Corporate governance and legal compliance as psychological drivers of environmental awareness and sustainable behavior. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i11.3974
  5. Aluchna, M., & Kuszewski, T. (2022). Responses to corporate governance codes: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Review of Managerial Science, 16(6), 1945-1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00496-3
  6. Andres, C., & Theissen, E. (2008). Who benefits from corporate governance regulation? Evidence from Germany. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(6), 549-563.
  7. Arcot, S., Bruno, V., & Faure-Grimaud, A. (2010). Corporate governance in the UK: Is the comply-or-explain approach working? International Review of Law and Economics, 30(2), 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2010.03.002
  8. Asplund, A. (2020). Lost in accountability: “Comply or explain”, “apply or explain” and “apply and explain” - The barriers to company benefit [Faculty of Law paper]. University of Oslo.
  9. Ay, Y. E. (2025). Lawsuit for the termination of the joint stock company for just cause under Turkish law. Journal of Legal Studies, 35(49), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2025-0010
  10. Beebeejaun, A. (2024). The perception and adoption of shareholder activism in banks: The case of Mauritius. Journal of African Business, 25(4), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2023.2227544
  11. Beebeejaun, A., & Bissessur, P. K. (2023). The adoption of shareholder activism by minority investors in Mauritius and a comparative analysis with the UK laws. International Journal of Law and Management, 65(6), 683-700. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-05-2023-0122
  12. Beebeejaun, A., & Koobloll, J. (2018). An assessment of whether shareholder activism can be a corporate governance driver in the case of Mauritius: A comparative study. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(6), 1313-1337. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-07-2017-0154
  13. Bourveau, T. (forthcoming). Comply-or-explain regulation and investor protection: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Governance Research.
  14. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67.
  15. Corporate Governance Institute. (2026). The corporate governance institute website. Retrieved April 8, 2026, from https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com
  16. Dillard, J. F., Rigsby, J. T., & Goodman, C. (2004). The making and remaking of organization context: Duality and the institutionalization process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 506-542.
  17. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  18. Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., & Stubben, S. R. (2013). Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3), 465-505.
  19. European Commission. (2002). Report of the high-level group of company law experts on a modern regulatory framework for company law in Europe.
  20. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  21. Financial Reporting Council. (2006). The combined code on corporate governance.
  22. Financial Reporting Council. (2012a). The UK corporate governance code.
  23. Financial Reporting Council. (2012b). What constitutes an explanation under “comply or explain”?
  24. Financial Reporting Council. (2018). The UK corporate governance code.
  25. Financial Reporting Council. (2021). Guidance on board effectiveness.
  26. Financial Reporting Council. (2024). The UK corporate governance code.
  27. Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 105-128.
  28. Grant Thornton. (2017). King III vs King IV: What you really need to know. https://www.grantthornton.co.za
  29. Gupta, G. K., & Verma, P. (2025). The influence of corporate governance on firm sustainability. Journal of Marketing and Social Research, 2(5), 305-312.
  30. Hooghiemstra, R. (2012). What determines the informativeness of firms’ explanations? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 551-566.
  31. Institute of Directors in Southern Africa. (1994). King report on corporate governance for South Africa 1994.
  32. Institute of Directors in Southern Africa. (2007). King report on corporate governance for South Africa.
  33. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
  34. Keay, A. (2014). Comply or explain in corporate governance codes. Legal Studies, 34(2), 279-304.
  35. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000a). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 3-27.
  36. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000b). Agency problems and dividend policies. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1-33.
  37. Lotze, M., et al. (2025). Comply or explain? Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 21, 123-145.
  38. Maurer, J. G. (Ed.). (1971). Readings in organization theory: Open-system approaches. Random House.
  39. Mavlanova, T., Benbunan-Fich, R., & Koufaris, M. (2012). Signaling theory and information asymmetry in online commerce. Information & Management, 49(5), 240-247.
  40. Mayer, C. (2018). Prosperity: Better business makes the greater good. Oxford University Press.
  41. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
  42. Mizruchi, M. S., & Fein, L. C. (1999). The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 653-683.
  43. Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (1995). Corporate governance. Blackwell.
  44. Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265-282.
  45. OECD. (2004). OECD principles of corporate governance.
  46. OECD. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance.
  47. OECD. (2023). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance 2023.
  48. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
  49. Parkinson, J. (2006). Corporate power and responsibility (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  50. Piotroski, J. D., & Wong, T. J. (2012). Institutions and information environment. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(2-3), 112-129.
  51. Richard, M. P. (2024). Legal perspective on the use of artificial intelligence in corporate governance in Nigeria: Potentials and challenges. Journal of Legal Studies, 34(48), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2024-0016
  52. Roncato, S., Medeiros, L. M., & Lerner, A. F. (2025). Effect of regulation on corporate governance practices and the quality of justifications of Brazilian companies. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-10-2024-0215
  53. Rose, C. (2016). Shareholder protection and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 264-285.
  54. Seidl, D., Sanderson, P., & Roberts, J. (2013). Applying the comply-or-explain principle. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(3), 791-826.
  55. Shrives, P. J., & Brennan, N. M. (2015). A typology for exploring the quality of explanations. The British Accounting Review, 47(1), 85-99.
  56. Taj, S. A. (2016). Application of signaling theory in management research: Addressing major gaps in theory. European Management Journal, 34(4), 338-348.
  57. Tricker, B. (2019). Corporate governance: Principles, policies and practices (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  58. Wattoo, A. (2025). Corporate governance and legal compliance. International Journal of Law and Policy, 3(12), 27-48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2026-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2457-9017 | Journal ISSN: 2392-7054
Language: English
Page range: 144 - 175
Submitted on: Mar 1, 2026
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2026
Published on: May 12, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Nishma Mayeputh, Ambareen Beebeejaun, published by Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.