Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Development of Individual Criminal Responsibility Under International Law: Lessons from Nuremberg and Tokyo War Crimes Trials Cover

The Development of Individual Criminal Responsibility Under International Law: Lessons from Nuremberg and Tokyo War Crimes Trials

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. 1. “Correspondents’ Reports”, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2009.
  2. 2. “Germane Considerations, “Individual Criminal Responsibility for Core International Crimes, 2008.
  3. 3. “International Human Rights to Conscientious Objection to Military Service and Individual Duties to Disobey Manifestly Illegal Order”, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2009.
  4. 4. “Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, Volume 41, 2010”, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2011.
  5. 5. “Nigerian Yearbook of International Law 2017”, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.
  6. 6. “United Kingdom House of Lords: Regina v. Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet”, International Legal Materials, 2017.
  7. 7. “Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Volume 18, 2015”, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2016.
  8. 8. Ainley, K., (2011). The International Criminal Court on Trial”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs.10.1080/09557571.2011.558051
  9. 9. Akande, D., (2003), The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits, Journal of International Criminal Justice.10.1093/jicj/1.3.618
  10. 10. Bankas, E., (2005), The State Immunity Controversy in International Law: Private Suits against Sovereign States in Domestic Courts, Springer Science and Business Media LLC.10.1007/3-540-27883-4
  11. 11. Bartels, R., (2015). Denying Humanitarian Access as an International Crime in Times of Non-International Armed Conflict: The Challenges to Prosecute and Some Proposals for the Future, Isr Law Review.10.1017/S0021223715000175
  12. 12. Beigbeder, Y., (2011). International Criminal Tribunals”, Springer Science and Business Media LLC.10.1057/9780230305052
  13. 13. Bianchi, A, (1999). Immunity versus Human Rights: The Pinochet Case, European Journal of International Law.10.1093/ejil/10.2.237
  14. 14. Brouwer, A.M., (2015). The Problem of Witness Interference before International Criminal Tribunals”, International Criminal Law Review.10.1163/15718123-01504005
  15. 15. Cakmak, C., (2017). A Brief History of International Criminal Laws and International Criminal Court, Springer Science and Business Media, LLC.10.1057/978-1-137-56736-9
  16. 16. Cryer, R., (2001). The Boundaries of Liability in International Criminal Law, or Selectivity by Stealth, Journal of Conflict and Security Law.10.1093/jcsl/6.1.3
  17. 17. Damgaard, C., (2008). Individual Criminal Responsibility for Core International Crimes, Springer Science and Business Media, LLC.10.1007/978-3-540-78781-5
  18. 18. Deen-Racsmany, Z., (2005). The Status of the Special Court for Sierra Leone and Its Implications for Immunity, Leiden Journal of International Law.10.1017/S0922156505002657
  19. 19. Elagab, Y.O., (2004). The Special Court for Sierra Leone: Some Constraints, The International Journal of Human Rights.10.1080/1364298042000255153
  20. 20. Fairlie, A. M., (2005). Adding Fuel to Milosevic’s Fire: How the use of Substitute Judges Discredits the UN War Crimes Tribunals, Criminal Law Forum.10.1007/s10609-005-6738-6
  21. 21. Gil, A., Maculan, E., (2015). Current Trends in the Definition of ‘Perpetrator’ by the International Criminal Court: From the Decision on the Confirmation of Charges in the Lubanga Case to the Katanga Judgment”, Leiden Journal of International Law.10.1017/S0922156515000114
  22. 22. Gillroy, M.J., (2013). An Evolutionary Paradigm for International Law, Springer Science and Business Media LLC.10.1057/9781137376657
  23. 23. Greppi, E., (2010), The Evolution of Individual Criminal Responsibility under International Law, International Review of the Red Cross, Volume 81, Issue 835.10.1017/S1560775500059782
  24. 24. Gutierrez Posse, D. T. H., (2006). The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and the International Criminal Tribunals, International Review of the Red Cross.
  25. 25. Huong, T.T.P., (2012). A Changing Notion of Complementarity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
  26. 26. Imoedemhe, O.C., (2017). The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court, Springer Science and Business Media LLC.10.1007/978-3-319-46780-1
  27. 27. Ingadottir, T., (2014). The Role of the International Court of Justice in the Enforcement of the Obligation of States to Investigate and Prosecute Serious Crimes at the National Level, Israel Law Review.10.1017/S0021223714000089
  28. 28. Kamari, C., (2015). Refiguring the Perpetrator: Culpability History and International Criminal Law’s Impunity gap, International Journal of Human Rights.
  29. 29. Kaye, D., (2014). Archiving Justice: Conceptualizing the Archives of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Archival Science.10.1007/s10502-014-9229-x
  30. 30. Kochavi, J. A., (2006). Israel and the International Legal Arena, Journal of Israel History.10.1080/13531040500502866
  31. 31. Marchuk, I., (2014). The Fundamental Concept of Crime in International Criminal Law, Springer Science and Business Media LLC.10.1007/978-3-642-28246-1
  32. 32. Marcus, J., (2015). Duress: From Nuremberg to the International Criminal Court, Finding the Balance between Justification and Excuse, Leiden Journal of International Law.
  33. 33. Meernik, J., (2004), Reaching Inside the State: International Law and Superior Liability, International Studies Perspectives.10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00184.x
  34. 34. Meloni, C., (2017). Modes of Responsibility (Article 28N) Individual Criminal Responsibility (Article 46B) and Corporate Criminal Liability (Article 46C).10.1007/978-94-6265-150-0_9
  35. 35. Mohamed, S., (2015). Deviance, Aspiration and the Stories we Tell: Reconciling Mass Atrocity and Criminal Law, Yale Law Journal.
  36. 36. Nouwen, M. H. S., (2005). The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Case Continued, Leiden Journal of International Law.10.1017/S0922156505002918
  37. 37. O’keefe, R., (2011). The United State and the ICC: The Force and Farce of the Legal Arguments, Cambridge Review of International Affairs.10.2139/ssrn.3496654
  38. 38. Palmer, G. M., (2004). Compensation for Vietnam’s Agent Orange Victims, International Journal of Human Rights.10.1080/1364298042000212510
  39. 39. Pita, J. C., Schimmeipenninck, O., (2004). A Surinam Crime before Dutch Court: Post-Colonial Injustice or Universal Jurisdiction? Leiden Journal of International Law.
  40. 40. Relva, H., (2003). The Implementation of the Rome Statute in Latin American States, Leiden Journal of International Law.10.1017/S0922156503001171
  41. 41. Sander, B., (2010). Unravelling the Confusion Concerning Successor Superior Responsibility in the ICTY Jurisprudence, Leiden Journal of International Law.10.1017/S0922156509990355
  42. 42. Sands, P., (2003). International Law Transformed? From Pinochet to Congo ......?, Leiden Journal of International Law.10.1017/S0922156503001018
  43. 43. Sangkul, K., (2016). Collective Genocidal Intent and Genocide as a Criminal Enterprise.
  44. 44. Sato, H., (2011). The Execution of Illegal Order and International Criminal Responsibility, Springer Science and Business Media LLC.10.1007/978-3-642-16753-9
  45. 45. Steer, C., (2017). Translating Guilt, Springer Science and Business Media LLC.10.1007/978-94-6265-171-5
  46. 46. Stephen, P.J., (2014). Collective Criminality and Individual Responsibility: The Constraints of Interpretation, Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 37, Issue 2.
  47. 47. Swaak-Goldman, O., (2008), Recent Developments in International Criminal Law: Trying to Stay Afloat between Scylia and Charybdis, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.
  48. 48. Tijs, K., Lachezar, Y., (2013). Divided Minds in the Lubanga Trial Judgment: A Case against the Joint Control Theory, International Criminal Law Review.
  49. 49. Vanacore, G., (2015). Legality, Culpability and Dogmatik: A Dialogue between the ECtHR, Comparative and International Criminal Law, International Criminal Law Review.10.1163/15718123-01506001
  50. 50. von Bogdandy, A., Wolfrum, R., (2009), Max Planck Institute of Comparative Public Law and International Law, Springer Science and Business Media LLC.10.1007/978-3-540-87467-6
  51. 51. Williamson, J.A., (2008). Some Considerations on Command Responsibility and Criminal Liability, International Review of the Red Cross, Volume 90, No. 870.10.1017/S1816383108000349
  52. 52. Wouters, J., (2003). The Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the Case: Some Critical Remarks, Leiden Journal of International Law.10.1017/S0922156503001146
  53. Online Sources:
  54. 1. www.jus.uio.no.
  55. 2. www.nycbar.org.
  56. 3. www.gistprobono.org.
  57. 4. www.usazeris.org.
  58. 5. www.hrc.upeace.org.
  59. 6. www.pulp.up.ac.za.
  60. 7. www.ilsa.org.
  61. 8. www.buponline.com.
  62. 9. www.cambridge.org.
  63. 10. www.gov.harvard.edu.
  64. 11. www.internationallawobserver.eu.
  65. 12. www.wcl.american.edu.
  66. 13. www.oup.com.
  67. 14. www.intelros.ru.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2020-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2457-9017 | Journal ISSN: 2392-7054
Language: English
Page range: 69 - 97
Submitted on: Apr 1, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2020
Published on: Jul 17, 2020
Published by: Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 William Edward Adjei, published by Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.