Decision-Making in the International Monetary Fund: Implications for Sovereign Equality of States

Ansong, Alex

doi:10.2478/jles-2019-0004

Abstract

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is one of the post-Second World War international organizations set up to promote good international economic cooperation among states. Unlike international organizations like the United Nations (UN) and the World Trade Organization (which succeeded the General Agreement on Tariff and Trade 1947), decision-making in the IMF is quite peculiar in that it is based on the joint stock company model where the value of shares determine the value of a member’s vote. Thus the principle of sovereign equality of states that underpins the one-member-one-vote system in the UN and WTO is absent in the IMF. This paper discusses the various decisionmaking organs in the IMF and concludes with a discussion on the sovereignty implications of the use of IMF conditionalities in the giving of loans, especially to developing countries.

References

1. Anghie, A. (2000). Time Present and Time Past: Globalization, International Financial Institutions and the Third World, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 32(2).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Argy, V., (1981). The Postwar International Monetary Crisis: An Analysis, London: George Allen & Unwin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Bernstein, E. (1996). The Making and Remaking of the Bretton Woods Institutions, in Orin Kirshner (ed.), The Bretton Woods-GATT System: Retrospect and Prospect After Fifty Years, New York: M. E. Sharpe Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Boas, M., McNeill, D. (2003). Multilateral Institutions: A Critical Introduction, Pluto Press, London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Boughton, J.M. (2003). Who’s in Charge? Ownership and Conditionality in IMFSupported Programs, IMF Working Paper, WP/03/191.10.5089/9781451859737.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Broad, R. (2004). The Washington Consensus Meets the Global Backlash: Shifting Debates and Policies, Globalizations, 1(2), pp. 129 – 154.10.1080/1474773042000308523
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Chimni, B.S. (2006). Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto’, International Community Law Review, 8, pp.3–27.10.1163/187197306779173220
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. David M. Andrews, D.M. (2008). Bretton Woods: System and Order’, in David M. Andrews (ed.), Orderly Change: International Monetary Relations since Bretton Woods, Cornell University Press, New York.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Emerson Hall, T., Ferguson, J.D. (1998). The Great Depression: An International Disaster of Perverse Economic Policies, University of Michigan Press, Michigan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Finch, D.C. (1989). The IMF: The Record and the Prospects, Princeton Essays in International Finance, No. 175.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Gardner, R.N. (1972).The Political Setting, in A.L.K. Acheson, J.F. Chant, and M.F.J. Prachowny (eds.), Bretton Woods Revisited: Evaluations of the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Garritsen de Vries, M. (1996). The Bretton Woods Conference and the Birth of the International Monetary Fund, in Orin Kirshner (ed.), The Bretton Woods- GATT System: Retrospect and Prospect After Fifty Years, M. E. Sharpe Inc, New York, pp.3-18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Gianviti, F. (1999). Decision-Making in the International Monetary Fund’, in Current Developments in Monetary and Financial Law, Vol.1, Legal Department of the IMF and the IMF Institute, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C, pp.31-67.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Gilpin, R. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400882779
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Gore, C. (2000). The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries, World Development, 28(5), pp. 789-804.10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00160-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Held, D. (2004). Global Covenant: The Social Demoratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Kelsen, H. (2000). Peace Through Law, The Lawbook Exchange Ltd, New Jersey.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Kenen, P.B. (2007). Reform of the International Monetary Fund, New York: Council on Foreign Relations, CSR NO. 29.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Macbean A.I., Snowden, P.N. (1981). International Institutions in Trade and Finance, George Allen & Unwin, London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Mountford, A. (2008). The Formal Governance Structure of the International Monetary Fund’, Independent Evaluation Office of the International Monetary Fund, Background Paper, BP/08/01.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Naim, M. (2000). Washingto Consensus or Washington Confusion?, Foreign Policy, Spring, pp.87-102.10.2307/1149672
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Peet, R. (2009). Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO, Zed Books, London.10.5040/9781350223745
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Portugal, M. (2005). Improving IMF Governance and Increasing the Influence of Developing Countries in IMF Decision-Making’, in Ariel Buira (ed.), Reforming the Governance of the IMF and the World Bank, Anthem Press, London, pp.75-106.10.7135/UPO9780857288189.006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Rodrik, D. (2001). The Global Governance of Trade: As if Development Really Mattered, United Nations Development Programme, New York.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Rowden, R. (2009). The Deadly Ideas of Neoliberalism: How the IMF has Undermined Public Health and the Fight Against AIDS, Zed Books, London, pp.49-78.10.5040/9781350223042
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Seavoy, R.E. (2003). Origins and Growth of the Global Economy: From the Fifteenth Century Onwards, Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., Westport.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Stevenson, J. (2000). Preventing Conflict: The Role of the Bretton Woods Institutions, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, Adelphi Papers 336, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its Discontents, Penguin Books, London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Swedberg, R. (1986). The Doctrine of Economic Neutrality of the IMF and World Bank, Journal of Peace Research, 23(4).10.1177/002234338602300406
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Thacker, S.C. (2006). The High Politics of IMF Lending, in Gustav Ranis, James Raymond Vreeland, and Stephen Kosack (eds.), Globalisation and the Nation State: The Impact of the IMF and the World Bank, Routledge, Abingdon, pp.111-12.10.4324/9780203323441_chapter_5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Treasurer’s Department, (1998). Finanacial Organization and Operations of the IMF, Pamphlet Series No.45, (5th ed.), Washington DC: IMF.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. van Houtven, L. (2002). Governance of the IMF: Decision Making, Institutional Oversight, Transparency, and Accountability, IMF Publication Services, Pamphlet Series No. 53, Washington D.C.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Vernon, R. (1996). The U.S. Government at Bretton Woods and After, in Orin Kirshner (ed.), The Bretton Woods-GATT System: Retrospect and Prospect After Fifty Years, M. E. Sharpe Inc. New York, pp.52-69.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Williams, M. (1994). International Economic Organisations and the Third World, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Williamson J. (ed.) (1990). Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington DC.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Woods, N. (2007). Bretton Woods Institutions in Thomas G. Weiss and Sam Daws (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.233-253.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560103.003.0013
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Woods, N. (2006). The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and Their Borrowers, Cornell University Press, New York.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. Woods, N., Narlikar, A. (2001). Governance and the Limits of Accountability: The WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank, International Social Science Journal, 53(170), pp.569–583.10.1111/1468-2451.00345
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. ***‗The IMF at a Glance, International Monetary Fund Factsheet, https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/IMF-at-a-Glance (viewed on 19 November 2018)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
41. ***‗How the IMF Makes Decisions, International Monetary Fund Factsheet, ttps://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/07/27/15/24/How-the-IMFMakes-Decisions (viewed on 18 November 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
42. ***‗A Guide to Committees, Groups and Clubs, International Monetary Fund Factsheet, https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/A-Guide-to-Committees-Groups-and-Clubs (viewed on 20 November 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
43. ***‗IMF Executive Directors and Voting Power, https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/eds.aspx (viewed on 20 November 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
44. ***IMF Finance Department, Quota and Voting Shares Before and After Implementation of Reforms Agreed in 2008 and 2010, https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2011/pdfs/quota_tbl.pdf (viewed on 20 November 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article