Biogeographic Realism in Species Distribution Models: Pseudo-Absence Strategies and Spatial Autocorrelation in Apodemus sylvaticus
By: Yehor V. Kozlov
References
- Aiello-Lammens, M.E., Boria, R.A., Radosavljevic, A., Vilela, B., & Anderson, R.P. (2015). spThin: An R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography, 38(5), 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01132.
- Alexander, J.M., Diez, J.M., & Levine, J.M. (2015). Novel competitors shape species’ responses to climate change. Nature, 525(7570), 515–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14952.
- Allouche, O., Tsoar, A., & Kadmon, R. (2006). Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology, 43(6), 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x.
- Alvarado‐Serrano, D.F., & Knowles, L.L. (2014). Ecological niche models in phylogeographic studies: Applications, advances and precautions. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12184.
- Araújo, M.B., & New, M. (2007). Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
- Araújo, M.B., Nogués-Bravo, D., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Haywood, A.M., Valdes, P.J., & Rahbek, C. (2008). Quaternary climate changes explain diversity among reptiles and amphibians. Ecography, 31(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05318.x.
- Araújo, M.B., Ferri‐Yáñez, F., Bozinovic, F., Marquet, P.A., Valladares, F., & Chown, S.L. (2013). Heat freezes niche evolution. Ecology Letters, 16(9), 1206–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12155.
- Austin, M.P. (2002). Spatial prediction of species distribution: An interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling, 157(2–3), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00205-3.
- Austrich, A., Kittlein, M.J., Mora, M.S., & Mapelli, F.J. (2021). Potential distribution models from two highly endemic species of subterranean rodents of Argentina: Which environmental variables have better performance in highly specialised species? Mammalian Biology, 101(4), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-021-00150-1
- Barbet-Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Albert, C.H., & Thuiller, W. (2012). Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: How, where and how many? Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(2), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00172.x.
- Barve, N., Barve, V., Jiménez-Valverde, A., Lira-Noriega, A., Maher, S.P., Peterson, A.T., Soberón, J., & Villalobos, F. (2011). The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modelling and species distribution modelling. Ecological Modelling, 222(11), 1810–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011.
- Bazzichetto, M., Lenoir, J., Da Re, D., Tordoni, E., Rocchini, D., Malavasi, M., Barták, V., & Sperandii, M. G. (2023). Sampling strategy matters to accurately estimate response curves’ parameters in species distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 32(10), 1717–1729. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13725.
- BCCVL (Biodiversity and Climate Change Virtual Laboratory). (2020). Absence data: True absence and pseudo-absence generation for species distribution models. Retrieved May 23, 2024, from https://support.bccvl.org.au/support/solutions/articles/absence-data.
- Bean, W.T., Prugh, L.R., Stafford, R., Butterfield, H.S., Westphal, M., & Brashares, J.S. (2014). Species distribution models of an endangered rodent offer conflicting measures of habitat quality at multiple scales. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(4), 1116–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12281.
- Beck, J., Böller, M., Erhardt, A., & Schwanghart, W. (2014). Spatial bias in the GBIF database and its effect on modelling species’ geographic distributions. Ecological Informatics, 19, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.002.
- Bivand, R.S., & Wong, D.W.S. (2018). Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. TEST, 27(3), 716–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x.
- Broussin, J., Mouchet, M., & Goberville, E. (2024). Generating pseudo-absences in the ecological space improves the biological relevance of response curves in species distribution models. Ecological Modelling, 498, Article 110865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110865.
- Cabral, J.S., & Schurr, F.M. (2010). Estimating demographic models for the range dynamics of plant species. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00492.x.
- Carlson, C.J. (2020). embarcadero: Species distribution modelling with Bayesian additive regression trees in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(7), 850–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13389.
- Castillo, D.S.C., & Higa, M. (2025). Effectiveness and implications of spatial background restrictions on model performance and predictions: A special reference for Rattus species. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 21(3), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-025-00653-w.
- Cerezer, F.O., Cáceres, N.C., & Dambros, C.S. (2021). Effect of Productivity on Community Size Explains the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient of South American Small Mammals. The American Naturalist, 198(4), E111–E121. https://doi.org/10.1086/716171.
- Chapman, D., Pescott, O. L., Roy, H. E., & Tanner, R. (2019). Improving species distribution models for invasive non-native species with biologically informed pseudo-absence selection. Journal of Biogeography, 46(5), 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13555.
- Chefaoui, R.M., & Lobo, J.M. (2008). Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance. Ecological Modelling, 210(4), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.010.
- Chipman, H.A., George, E.I., & McCulloch, R.E. (2010). BART: Bayesian additive regression trees. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(1), 266–298. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOAS285.
- Conrad, O., Bechtel, B., Bock, M., Dietrich, H., Fischer, E., Gerlitz, L., Wehberg, J., Wichmann, V., & Böhner, J. (2015). System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(7), 1991–2007. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015.
- Da Re, D., Tordoni, E., Lenoir, J., Lembrechts, J.J., Vanwambeke, S.O., Rocchini, D., & Bazzichetto, M. (2023). USE it: Uniformly sampling pseudo-absences within the environmental space for applications in habitat suitability models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 14(11), 2873–2887. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14209.
- Da Re, D., Tordoni, E., Lenoir, J., Rubin, S., & Vanwambeke, S.O. (2024). Towards causal relationships for modelling species distribution. Journal of Biogeography, 51(5), 840–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14775.
- Dallas, T.A., & Kramer, A. (2022). A latitudinal signal in the relationship between species geographic range size and climatic niche area. Ecography, 2022(12). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.06349.
- Dormann, C.F., McPherson, J.M., Araújo, M.B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., Davies, R.G., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Kissling, W.D., Kühn, I., Ohlemüller, R., Peres-Neto, P.R., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Schurr, F.M., & Wilson, R. (2007). Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: A review. Ecography, 30(5), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.05171.x.
- EcoCommons, (2025). Species distribution modelling with MaxEnt. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://support.ecocommons.org.au/support/solutions/articles/6000254294.
- Elith, J., Leathwick, J.R. (2009). Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159.
- Ferrier, S., Watson, G., Pearce, J., & Drielsma, M. (2002). Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. I. Species-level modelling. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11(12), 2275–2307. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302930424.
- Fithian, W., Elith, J., Hastie, T., & Keith, D.A. (2015). Bias correction in species distribution models: Pooling survey and collection data for multiple species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6(4), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12287.
- Fleishman, E., Mac Nally, R.M., Fay, J.P., & Murphy, D.D. (2001). Modelling and predicting species occurrence using broad-scale environmental variables: An example with butterflies of the Great Basin. Conservation Biology, 15(6), 1674–1685. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00053.x.
- Forman, R.T.T. (1995). Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press.
- Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M. (1986) Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Franklin, J. (2023). Species distribution modelling supports study of past, present and future biogeographies. Journal of Biogeography, 50(9), 1533–1545.
- Gábor, L., Jetz, W., Lu, M., Rocchini, D., Cord, A., Malavasi, M., Zarzo‐Arias, A., Barták, V., & Moudrý, V. (2022). Positional errors in species distribution modelling are not overcome by the coarser grains of analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(10), 2289–2302. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13956.
- García‐Díaz, P., Prowse, T.A., Anderson, D.P., Lurgi, M., Binny, R.N., & Cassey, P. (2019). A concise guide to developing and using quantitative models in conservation management. Conservation science and practice, 1(2), e11. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.11.
- Gastón, A., García-Viñas, J.I., Bravo-Fernández, A.J., López-Leiva, C., Oliet, J.A., Roig, S., & Serrada, R. (2014). Species distribution models applied to plant species selection in forest restoration: Are model predictions comparable to expert opinion? New Forests, 45(5), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9427-7.
- GBIF.org. (2024). GBIF occurrence download. Retrieved May 23, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.3pqwpb.
- GBIF.org. (2025). GBIF occurrence download. Retrieved December 3, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.g8y2r6.
- GBIF.org. (2026). GBIF occurrence download. Retrieved March 5, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.kdtcep.
- Graham, C.H., Elith, J., Hijmans, R.J., Guisan, A., Townsend Peterson, A., Loiselle, B.A., & The NCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group. (2008). The influence of spatial errors in species occurrence data used in distribution models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(1), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01408.x.
- Guisan, A., & Zimmermann, N.E. (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135(2–3), 147–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9.
- Guisan, A., & Thuiller, W. (2005). Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 8(9), 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x.
- Guisan, A., Tingley, R., Baumgartner, J.B., Naujokaitis-Lewis, I., Sutcliffe, P.R., Tulloch, A.I.T., Regan, T.J., Brotons, L., McDonald-Madden, E., Mantyka-Pringle, C., Martin, T.G., Rhodes, J.R., Maggini, R., Setterfield, S.A., Elith, J., Schwartz, M.W., Wintle, B.A., Broennimann, O., Austin, M., Ferrier, S., Kearney, M.R., Possingham, H.P., & Buckley, Y.M. (2013). Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecology Letters, 16(12), 1424–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12189.
- Guisan, A., Broennimann, O., Thuiller, W., Peterson, A.T., Zimmermann, N.E., Huettmann, F., & Graham, C.H. (2025). Spatially nested species distribution models (N-SDM): An effective tool to overcome niche truncation for more robust inference and projections. Journal of Ecology, 113(6), 1255–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70063.
- Gutiérrez‐Tapia, P., & Palma, R.E. (2016). Integrating phylogeography and species distribution models: Cryptic distributional responses to past climate change in an endemic rodent from the central Chile hotspot. Diversity and Distributions, 22(6), 638–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12433.
- Halley, J.M., Hartley, S., Kallimanis, A.S., Kunin, W.E., Lennon, J.J., & Sgardelis, S.P. (2004). Uses and abuses of fractal methodology in ecology. Ecology Letters, 7(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00568.x.
- Herman, J. S., Jóhannesdóttir, F., Jones, E. P., McDevitt, A. D., Michaux, J. R., White, T. A., Wójcik, J. M., & Searle, J. B. (2017). Post-glacial colonisation of Europe by the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus: evidence of a northern refugium and dispersal with humans. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 120(2), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12882.
- Hernandez, P.A., Graham, C.H., Master, L.L., & Albert, D.L. (2006). The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modelling methods. Ecography, 29(5), 773-785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x.
- Hernandez, P.A., Franke, I., Herzog, S.K., Pacheco, V., Paniagua, L., Quintana, H.L., ... & Young, B.E. (2008). Predicting species distributions in poorly-studied landscapes. Biodiversity and conservation, 17(6), 1353-1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9314-z.
- Hijmans, R.J. (2024). terra: Spatial data analysis (Version 1.7-65) [R package]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra.
- Holt, B.G., Lessard, J.-P., Borregaard, M.K., Fritz, S.A., Araújo, M.B., Dimitrov, D., Fabre, P.-H., Graham, C.H., Graves, G.R., Jønsson, K.A., Nogués-Bravo, D., Wang, Z., Whittaker, R.J., Fjeldså, J., & Rahbek, C. (2013). An update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions of the world. Science, 339(6115), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228282.
- Hutchinson, G.E. (1957). Population studies—Animal ecology and demography—Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415–427.
- Jackson, S.T., & Overpeck, J.T. (2000). Responses of plant populations and communities to environmental changes of the late Quaternary. Paleobiology, 26(S4), 194–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300026932.
- Jiang, G., Liu, J., Xu, L., Yu, G., He, H., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Climate warming increases biodiversity of small rodents by favoring rare or less abundant species in a grassland ecosystem. Integrative Zoology, 8(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12027.
- Jiménez-Valverde, A., Lobo, J.M., & Hortal, J. (2008). Not as good as they seem: The importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions, 14(6), 885–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00496.x.
- Jongman, R.H., Külvik, M., & Kristiansen, I. (2004). European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and urban planning, 68(2-3), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00163-4.
- Kapelner, A., Bleich, J. (2016). bartMachine: Machine learning with Bayesian additive regression trees. Journal of Statistical Software, 70, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v070.i04.
- Kearney, M., & Porter, W.P. (2004). Mapping the fundamental niche: Physiology, climate, and the distribution of a nocturnal lizard. Ecology, 85(11), 3119–3131. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0820.
- Korslund, L., & Steen, H. (2006). Small rodent winter survival: Snow conditions limit access to food resources. Journal of Animal ecology, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01031.x
- Kuhn, M. (2008). Building predictive models in R using the caret package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28(5), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v028.i05.
- Legendre, P. (1993). Spatial autocorrelation: Trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74(6), 1659–1673. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939924.
- Leroy, B., Delsol, R., Hugueny, B., Meynard, C.N., Barhoumi, C., Barbet-Massin, M., & Bellard, C. (2017). Without quality presence–absence data, discrimination metrics such as TSS can be misleading measures of model performance. Ecology, 98(12), 3215. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2043.
- Li, B.L. (2000). Fractal geometry applications in description and analysis of patch patterns and patch dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 132(1-2), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00303-3.
- Lobo, J.M., Jiménez-Valverde, A., & Hortal, J. (2010). The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. Ecography, 33(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06039.x.
- McPherson, J.M., Jetz, W., & Rogers, D.J. (2004). The effects of species’ range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact?. Journal of applied ecology, 41(5), 811-823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00943.x.
- McRae, B.H., Shah, V.B., & Mohapatra, T.K. (2009). Circuitscape user’s guide. The University of California, Santa Barbara. Retrieved May 20, 2009, from http://www.circuitscape.org.
- McRae, B. H., & Kavanagh, D. M. (2011). Linkage Mapper connectivity analysis software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from http://www.circuitscape.org/linkagemapper.
- Mezhzherin, S.V. & Lashkova, E.I. (1992). Diagnostics, geographic variation and distribution of two closely related mice species Sylvaemus sylvaticus and S. flavicollis (Rodentia, Muridae) in an area of their overlapping occurrence. Vestnik Zoologii, No. 3, pp. 33-41 (in Russian).
- Mezhzherin, S.V., & Kozlov, Y.V. (2026). Patterns of range formation in Palaearctic mice (Murinae) based on ecological niche modelling. Zoodiversity, 60(2), https://doi.org/10.15407/zoo2026.02.149.
- Michaux, J.R., Filippucci, M.-G., Libois, R.M., Fons, R. & Matagne, R.F. (1996). Biogeography and taxonomy of Apodemus sylvaticus (the woodmouse) in the Tyrrhenian region: enzymatic variations and mitochondrial DNA restriction pattern analysis. Heredity, 76, Supl. 2, pp. 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.40.
- Michaux, J.R., Libois, R.M. & Filippucci, M.-G. (2005). So close and so different: comparative phylogeography of two small mammal species, the Yellow-necked fieldmouse (Apodemus flavicollis) and the Woodmouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) in the Western Palaearctic region. Heredity, 94, Supl. 1, pp. 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800561.
- Michaux, J.R., Magnanou, E., Paradis, E., Nieberding, C. & Libois, R. (2003). Mitochondrial phylogeography of the Woodmouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) in the Western Palaearctic region. Molecular Ecology, 12(3), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01752.x.
- Milne, B.T. (1992). Spatial aggregation and neutral models in fractal landscapes. The American Naturalist, 139(1), 32–57.
- Moudrý, V., Bazzichetto, M., Remelgado, R., Devillers, R., Lenoir, J., Mateo, R.G., Lembrechts, J.J., Sillero, N., Lecours, V., Cord, A.F., Barták, V., Balej, P., Rocchini, D., Torresani, M., Arenas-Castro, S., Man, M., Prajzlerová, D., Gdulová, K., Prošek, J., & Šímová, P. (2024). Optimising occurrence data in species distribution models: Sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias matter. Ecography, 2024(12), Article e07294. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07294.
- Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D.G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N.J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N. (2021): ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021.
- Muscarella, R., Galante, P.J., Soley-Guardia, M., Boria, R.A., Kass, J.M., Uriarte, M., & Anderson, R.P. (2014). ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(11), 1198–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12261.
- Nater, C.R., Van Benthem, K.J., Canale, C.I., Schradin, C., & Ozgul, A. (2018). Density feedbacks mediate effects of environmental change on population dynamics of a semidesert rodent. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87(6), 1534–1546. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12888.
- Naimi, B., Skidmore, A.K., Groen, T.A., & Hamm, N.A.S. (2011). Spatial autocorrelation in predictors reduces the impact of positional uncertainty in occurrence data on species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 38(8), 1497–1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02523.x.
- Paquette, A., & Hargreaves, A.L. (2021). Biotic interactions are more often important at species’ warm versus cool range edges. Ecology Letters, 24(11), 2427–2438. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13864.
- Parreira, M. R., & Nabout, J. C. (2023). Hydropower plants as dispersal barriers in freshwater species distribution models: using restrictions through asymmetrical dispersal predictors. Environmental Management, 72(2), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01812-1
- Pearson, R.G., & Dawson, T.P. (2003). Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12(5), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x
- Pe’er, G., Finn, J.A., Díaz, M., Birkenstock, M., Lakner, S., Röder, N., ... & Guyomard, H. (2022). How can the European Common Agricultural Policy help halt biodiversity loss? Recommendations by over 300 experts. Conservation Letters, 15(6), e12901. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12901.
- Peterson, A.T. (2006). Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models. Biodiversity Informatics, 3, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v3i0.29.
- Peterson, A.T., Soberón, J., Pearson, R.G., Anderson, R.P., Martínez-Meyer, E., Nakamura, M., & Araújo, M.B. (2011). Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840670
- Phillips, S.J., Dudík, M., Elith, J., Graham, C.H., Lehmann, A., Leathwick, J., & Ferrier, S. (2009). Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: Implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications, 19(1), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2153.1
- Pili, A., Leroy, B., & Zurell, D. (2025). Correcting environmental sampling bias improves transferability of species distribution models. Ecography, 2025(1), Article e08002. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08002.
- R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
- Rausell-Moreno, A., Galiana, N., Naimi, B., & Araújo, M.B. (2025). Improving species distribution models by optimising background points: Impacts on current and future climate projections. Ecological Modelling, 507, Article 111177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111177.
- Record, S., Strecker, A., Tuanmu, M.N., Beaudrot, L., Zarnetske, P., Belmaker, J., & Gerstner, B. (2018). Does scale matter? A systematic review of incorporating biological realism when predicting changes in species distributions. PLoS One, 13(4), e0194650.
- Roberts, D.R., Bahn, V., Ciuti, S., Boyce, M.S., Elith, J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Hauenstein, S., Lahoz-Monfort, J.J., Schröder, B., Thuiller, W., Warton, D.I., Wintle, B.A., Hartig, F., & Dormann, C.F. (2017). Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography, 40(8), 913–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02881.
- Rusin, M. (2024). Apodemus sylvaticus (Europe assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T1904A221788084. Retrieved November 30, 2025, from https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2024-2.RLTS.T1904A221788084.en.
- Scherrer, D., Esperon‐Rodriguez, M., Beaumont, L.J., Barradas, V.L., & Guisan, A. (2021). National assessments of species vulnerability to climate change strongly depend on selected data sources. Diversity and Distributions, 27(8), 1367-1382. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13275.
- Schlitter, D., Van der Straeten, E., Amori, G., Hutterer, R., Kryštufek, B., Yigit, N., & Mitsainas, G. (2021). Apodemus sylvaticus (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021, e.T1904A197270811. Retrieved May 30, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-1.RLTS.T1904A197270811.en.
- Seuront, L. (2009). Fractals and multifractals in ecology and aquatic science. CRC Press. Smith, A.B., Murphy, S.J., Henderson, D., & Erickson, K.D. (2023). Including imprecisely georeferenced specimens improves accuracy of species distribution models and estimates of niche breadth. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 32(3), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13628.
- Svenning, J., & Skov, F. (2007a). Could the tree diversity pattern in Europe be generated by postglacial dispersal limitation? Ecology Letters, 10(6), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01038.x.
- Svenning, J., & Skov, F. (2007b). Ice age legacies in the geographical distribution of tree species richness in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00280.x.
- Soberón, J. (2007). Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distribution of species. Ecology Letters, 10(12), 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01107.x.
- Stewart, J. (2008). The progressive effect of the individualistic response of species to Quaternary climate change: An analysis of British mammalian faunas. Quaternary Science Reviews, 27(27–28), 2499–2508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.08.003.
- Thibaud, E., Petitpierre, B., Broennimann, O., Davison, A.C., & Guisan, A. (2014). Measuring the relative effect of factors affecting species distribution model predictions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(9), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12203.
- Tulloch, A.I.T., Sutcliffe, P., Naujokaitis-Lewis, I., Tingley, R., Brotons, L., Ferraz, K.M.P. B., Possingham, H., & Rhodes, J.R. (2016). Conservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processes. Biological Conservation, 199, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.023.
- Tytar, V.M. (2011). Analysis of species habitats; an approach based on ecological niche modelling. Vestnik Zoologi. 2011. No. 25. 93 p. (in Ukrainian).
- Umetsu, F., Pardini, R. (2007). Small mammals in a mosaic of forest remnants and anthropogenic habitats—evaluating matrix quality in an Atlantic forest landscape. Landscape Ecol 22, 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9041-y.
- Urban, D.L. (1994). Landscape ecology and ecosystem management. In W. W. Covington & L. F. DeBano (Eds.), Sustainable ecological systems: Implementing an ecological approach to land management (pp. 127–136). USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
- Varela, S., Anderson, R.P., García-Valdés, R., & Fernández-González, F. (2014). Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models. Ecography, 37(11), 1087–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00441.x.
- Veloz, S.D. (2009). Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. Journal of Biogeography, 36(12), 2290–2299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02174.x.
- Wan, X., Yan, C., Wang, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Sustained population decline of rodents is linked to accelerated climate warming and human disturbance. BMC Ecology and Evolution, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-02056-z.
- Wang, X., Xu, Q., & Liu, J. (2023). Determining representative pseudo-absences for invasive plant distribution modelling based on geographic similarity. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, Article 1193602. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1193602.
- Warren, R.J., Costa, J.T., & Bradford, M.A. (2022). Seeing shapes in clouds: the fallacy of deriving ecological hypotheses from statistical distributions. Oikos, 2022(11), e09315. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.09315.
- Whittaker, R.J., Willis, K.J., & Field, R. (2001). Scale and species richness: Towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 28(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00563.x.
- Wieczorek, J., Guo, Q., & Hijmans, R. (2004). The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(8), 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810412331280211.
- Wüest, R.O., Münkemüller, T., Lavergne, S., Pollock, L.J., & Thuiller, W. (2018). Integrating correlation between traits improves spatial predictions of plant functional composition. Oikos, 127(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.04420.
- Zarzo-Arias, A., Uhl, B., Maynard, D.S., & Morales, M.B. (2023). The ecological niche at different spatial scales. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, Article 1296340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1296340.
- Zhao, J., & Pu, Y. (2025). Characterisation and estimation of heterogeneous spatial autocorrelation in spatial autoregressive models. PLoS ONE, 20(7), Article e0327316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327316.
- Zurell, D., Franklin, J., König, C., Bouchet, P.J., Dormann, C.F., Elith, J., ... & Merow, C. (2020). A standard protocol for reporting species distribution models. Ecography, 43(9), 1261-1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04960.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2026-0034 | Journal eISSN: 1805-4196 | Journal ISSN: 1803-2427 (formerly 1805-4196)
Language: English
Page range: 284 - 319
Submitted on: Dec 11, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 15, 2026
Published on: Aug 3, 2026
Published by: Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Yehor V. Kozlov, published by Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.