Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Floodplain Forests and Urban Parks – A Brief Comparison of Bird Diversity Cover

Floodplain Forests and Urban Parks – A Brief Comparison of Bird Diversity

Open Access
|Jan 2022

References

  1. Angelstam, P., Roberge, J.M., Lohmus, A., Bergmanis, M., Brazaitis, G., Dönz-Breuss, M., Edenius, L., Kosinski, Z., Kurlavičius, P., Larmanis, V., Lukins, M., Mikusinski, G., Račinskis, E., Stradzs, M. & Tryjanowski, P. (2004). Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation - a review of parameters for focal forest birds. Ecol. Bull., 51, 427-453. Accession Number: ZOOREC:ZOOR14602013716.
  2. Bibby, C.J., Burges, N.D., Hill, D.A. & Mustoe, S. (2007). Bird Census Techniques; Academic Press: London; pp. 42–64, ISBN 978-0-12-095831-3.
  3. Bureš, S. (1986). Analyses of bird community in proposed natural reserve Sargoun. Manuscript, a report for OSSPPOP Olomouc.
  4. Bureš, S. & Maton, K. (1984). Bird community of Ulmi-fraxineta populi forest habitat in proposed PLA Pomoravi. Sylvia, 23/24, 37-46.
  5. Chace, J.F. & Walsh, J.J. (2006). Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Land Urban Plan 74, 46-69. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007
  6. Chytil, J. (1981). Comparison of ecological production between mammals and birds in floodplain forest. Master thesis, Jan E. Purkyně University, Brno.
  7. Cupa, P. & Madera, P. (2019). The UNESCO Dolni Morava Biosphere Reserve - A model for cultural landscape management. Eco Mont – Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research, 11, 2, 36-42. Doi: 10.1553/eco.mont-11-2s36,10.1553/eco.mont-11-2s36
  8. Daniels, G., Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? Biological Conservation, 133, 326-335.10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.011
  9. Elands, B. H. M., et al.(2019). Biocultural diversity: A novel concept to assess human-nature interrelations, nature conservation and stewardship in cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, 29-34. Doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.04.006.10.1016/j.ufug.2018.04.006
  10. Guo, S.; Su, C.; Saito, K.; Cheng, J.; Terada, T. (2019). Bird Communities in Urban Riparian Areas: Response to the Local- and Landscape-Scale Environmental Variables. Forests, 10, 683. doi: 10.3390/f10080683.10.3390/f10080683
  11. Horák, Z. (1998). Birds in the vicinity of stare Labe u Cihelny near Pardubice in 1984-1997. Panurus, Pardubice, 9, 53-61.
  12. Hudec, K. (2001). Changes in avifauna of South-Moravia floodplain during the 20th century. In: Řehořek, V. & Květ, R. (eds.), Floodplain in multidisciplinary approaches IV. Geotest, Brno: 101-102.
  13. Jaccard, P. (1901). Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37, 547-579.
  14. Kilianova, H.; Pechanec, V.; Lacina, J.; Halas, P. (2009). Ecotones in Current Landscape: Analyses and Modelling of Ecotones in Trkmanka River Basin. Pp. 1-167. Palacky Univ Olomouc, ISBN:978-80-244-2473-6.
  15. Kilianova, H.; Pechanec, V.; Brus, J.; Kirchner, K.; Machar, I. (2017). Analysis of the development of land use in the Morava River floodplain, with special emphasis on the landscape matrix. Moravian Geographical Records, 25, 46-59. DOI 10.1515/mgr-2017-0005.10.1515/mgr-2017-0005
  16. Klimo E. & Hager H. (2001). The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. European Forest Institute Research Report, 10. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.
  17. Kučera, T. & Kloubcová, P. (2015). Veselý P. Diverse vegetation in a spa town supports human social benefits of urban birds. Biodivers Conserv, 24, 3329-3346. Doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0974-9.10.1007/s10531-015-0974-9
  18. Kümmerling, M. & Müller, N. (2012). The relationship between landscape design style and the conservation value of parks. A case study of a historical park in Weimar Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107, 111-117. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.006.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.006
  19. Lancaster, R.K. & Rees, W.E. (1979). Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Can. J. Zool. 57, 2358-2368.10.1139/z79-307
  20. Lehmann, S. (2021). Growing Biodiverse Urban Features: Renaturalization and Rewilding as strategies to Strengthen Urban Resilience. Sustainability, 13, 2932. Doi: 10.3390/su13052932.10.3390/su13052932
  21. Lemberk, V. (2001). Comparison of bird communities of four floodplain forests in East-Bohemia. Panurus, Pardubice, 11: 69-79.
  22. Lepczyk, C.A., Aronson, M.F.J., Evans, K.L., Goddard, M.A., Lerman S.B. & MacIvor, J.S. (2017). Biodiversity in the City: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. BioScience, 67, 799-807. Doi: 10.1093/biosci.bix079.
  23. Liu, J., Bai, H., Ma, H. & Feng, G. (2019). Bird diversity in Chinese urban parks was more associated with natural factors than anthropogenic factors. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 43, 126358. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.06.00.
  24. Liu, Z.; Huang, Q.; Tang, G. (2020). Identification of urban flight corridors for migratory birds in the coastal regions of Shenzhen city based on three-dimensional landscapes. Landscape Ecology, doi:10.1007/s10980-020-01032-6.10.1007/s10980-020-01032-6
  25. Machar, I. (2008). Changes in the fragmentation and ecological stability of the floodplain forest geobiocenosis of the Morava River floodplain in the course of the 20th century (Vrapač National Nature Reserve, Litovelské Pomoraví, Czech Republic). Journal of Landscape Ecology, 1, 38-48.10.2478/v10285-012-0004-5
  26. Machar, I. (2009). Changes in nesting bird community in chateau garden Cechy pod Kosirem – implications for nature conservation. Přírodovědné studie Muzea Prostějovska, 10-11, 67-78. ISSN 1803-1404.
  27. Machar, I. (2010). Results of research on structure of bird communities in forests and applications to nature conservation. Příroda, 29, 21-27.
  28. Machar, I. (2012). The effect of floodplain forest fragmentation on bird community. Journal of Forest Science, 58, 5, 213-22410.17221/123/2010-JFS
  29. Machar, I., Kulhavy, J., Sejak, J. & Pechanec, V. (2018). Conservation effectiveness and monetary value of floodplain forests habitats in the Czech Republic. Reports of Forestry Research-Zpravy Lesnickeho Vyzkumu, 63, 206-213. Accession Number: WOS:000449789300006.
  30. Machar, I., Schlossarek, M., Pechanec, V., Uradnicek, L., Praus, L. & Sivacioglu A. (2019). Retention Forestry Supports Bird Diversity in Managed, Temperate Hardwood Floodplain Forests. Forests, 10, 300, doi: 10.3390/f10040300.10.3390/f10040300
  31. MacGregor-Fors, I. & Ortega-Alvárez, R. (2011). Fading the forest: Bird community shifts related to urban park site-specific and landscape traits. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10, 239-246. Doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.004.10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.004
  32. Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R. & Donnelly, R. (2001). Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9
  33. Mazurek, M.J.; Zielinski, W.J. (2004). Individual legacy trees influence vertebrate wildlife diversity in commercial forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 193, 321-334, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.013.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.013
  34. Nava-Díaz, R.; Pineda-López, R.; Dorantes-Euan, A. (2020). Drivers of Functional Composition of Bird assembladges in Green Spaces of a Neotropical City: A Case Study from Merida, Mexico. Tropical Conservation Science, 13, 1-13. Doi: 10.1177/1940082920923896.10.1177/1940082920923896
  35. Ortega-Alvárez, R.; MacGregor-Fors, I. (2009). Living in the big city: Effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90, 189-195. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.003.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.003
  36. Pavelka, J. (1987). Nesting bird community in floodplain forest along Odra River. Zprávy MOS, Přerov, 46, 115–118.
  37. Pavlik, J. & Pavlik, S. (2000). Some relationships between human impacts, vegetation, and birds in urban environment. Ekologia-Bratislava, 19, 392-408.
  38. Pellissier, V., Cohen, M., Boulay, A. & Clergeau, P. (2012). Birds are sensitive to landscape composition and configuration within the city centre. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104, 181-188. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbanplan.2011.10.011.
  39. Polášek, V. (1991). Results of research on avifauna of floodplain forest in Litovelske Pomoravi. Master thesis. Palacky Univerzity, Olomouc.
  40. Pykal, J. (1991). Avifauna in different types of natural forest habitats in South-West Bohemia highland. Panurus, Pardubice, 3: 67-76.
  41. Růžička, I. (1985). Results of ornithological research in Chrbovsky les site. Master thesis. Palacky Univerzity, Olomouc.
  42. StataCorp (2017). Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
  43. Storch, D. (1998). Densities and territory of birds in two different lowland communities in eastern Bohemia. Folia Zoologica, 47 (3), 181-188.
  44. Toman, A. (1984). Avifauna of Zastudanci Natural Reserve, Master thesis. Palacky Univerzity, Olomouc.
  45. Shannon, C.E. & Weawer, V. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  46. Sheldon, A.L. (1969). Equitability indices: Dependence on the species count. Ecology, 50, 466-467.10.2307/1933900
  47. Sakhvon, V.; Kövér, L. (2020). Distribution and habitat preferences of the urban Woodpigeon (Columba palumbus) in the north-eastern breeding range in Belarus. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201, 103846. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103846.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103846
  48. Yang, G.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Pei, E.; Yuan, X.; Li, H.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Z. (2015). Evaluation of microhabitats for wild birds in a Shanghai urban area park. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14, 246-254. Doi: 10.1016/.j.ufug.2015.02.005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2021-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1805-4196 | Journal ISSN: 1803-2427
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 11
Submitted on: May 25, 2021
|
Accepted on: Aug 4, 2021
|
Published on: Jan 18, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Ivo Machar, Karel Poprach, Luděk Praus, Luboš Úradníček, published by Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.