Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Syn-Ecological Connections and Comparison of Α-Diversity Indices of Plant and Bird Communities on Cultivated Coenosises Cover

Syn-Ecological Connections and Comparison of Α-Diversity Indices of Plant and Bird Communities on Cultivated Coenosises

Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. Akimov, I.A.; Azmanova, N.V. & Asaulova, V.M., Eds. (2006). Ecological Atlas of Kyiv. Kyiv: Agency Intermedia (in Ukrainian).
  2. Belik, V.P. (2006). Faunogenetic Structure of the Palearctic Avifauna. Entomol. Rev., 86(1), 15-31. DOI: 10.1134/S0013873806100022.10.1134/S0013873806100022
  3. Bergner, A., Avci, M., Eryiğit, H., Jansson, N., Niklasson, M., Westerberg, L. & Milberg, P. (2015). Influences of forest type and habitat structure on bird assemblages of oak (Quercus spp.) and pine (Pinus spp.) stands in southwestern Turkey. Forest Ecology and Management, 336(15), 137-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.025.10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.025
  4. Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A., & Mustoe, S.H. (2000). Bird Census Techniques, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.
  5. Biluk, G. (1977). Geobotanical zoning of Ukraine. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
  6. Birds of the National Garden (n.d.). In United States Botanic Garden. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from https://www.usbg.gov/NGbirds.
  7. Blinkova, O. & Ivanenko О. (2018). Communities of woody vegetation and wood destroying fungi in natural and semi-natural forests of Kyiv city, Ukraine. Central European Forestry Journal, 64, 55–66. DOI: 10.1515/forj-2017-0030.10.1515/forj-2017-0030
  8. Blinkova, O. & Shupova T. (2017). Bird communities and vegetation composition in the urban forest ecosystem: correlations and comparisons of diversity indices. Ekologia (Bratislava), 36(4), 366-87. DOI: 10.1515/eko-2017-0029.10.1515/eko-2017-0029
  9. Blinkova, O. & Shupova T. (2018). Bird communities and vegetation composition in natural and semi-natural forests of megalopolis: correlations and comparisons of diversity indices (Kyiv city, Ukraine). Ekologia (Bratislava), 37(3), 259-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2018-0021.10.2478/eko-2018-0021
  10. Browder, S.F., Johnson, D.H. & Ball, I.J. (2002). Assemblages of breeding birds as indicators of grassland condition. Ecological Indicators, 2(3), 257-270. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00060-210.1016/S1470-160X(02)00060-2
  11. Camprodon, J. & Brotons, L. (2006). Effects of undergrowth clearing on the bird communities of the Northwestern Mediterranean Coppice Holm oak forests. For. Ecol. Manag., 221(1–3), 72-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.044.10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.044
  12. Carlson, A., Sandstrom, U. & Olsson, K. (1998). Availability and use of natural tree holes by cavity nesting birds in a Swedish deciduous forest. Ardea, 86(1), 109-119.
  13. Catsadorakis, G. (1997). Breeding birds from reed beds to alpine meadows. Hydrobiologia, 351, 143-155. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003080911744.10.1023/A:1003080911744
  14. Chaplygina, A., Shupova, T. & Nadtochiy A. (2016). The avifauna of the National Nature Park “HomilshanskiLisy. Biosystems Diversity, 24(1), 124-133. DOI: 10.15421/01161510.15421/011615
  15. Conner, R.N. & Dickson, J.D. (1997). Relationships between bird communities and forest age, structure, species composition and fragmentation in the west gulf coastal plain. Tex. J. Sci., 49, 123-138.
  16. Domokos, E. & Domokos J. (2016). Bird communities of different woody vegetation types from the Niraj Valley, Romania. Turk. J. Zool., 40, 734-742. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1510-64.10.3906/zoo-1510-64
  17. Everard, M. (2008). Selection of taxa as indicators of river and freshwater wetland quality in the UK. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18 (6), 1052-1061. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.89610.1002/aqc.896
  18. Fischer, J., Lindenmayer, D.B., Blomberg, S.P., Montague-Drake, R., Felton, A. & Stein, J.A. (2007). Functional Richness and Relative Resilience of Bird Communities in Regions with Different Land Use Intensities. Ecosystems, 10 (6), 964-974. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9071-610.1007/s10021-007-9071-6
  19. Fuller, R.J. & Moreton, B.D. (1987). Breeding bird population of Kentish sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) coppice in relation to age and structure of the coppice. J. Appl. Ecol., 24(1), 13-27. DOI: 10.2307/2403784.10.2307/2403784
  20. Gabbe, A.P, Robinson, S.K. & Brawn, J.D. (2002). Tree-Species Preferences of Foraging Insectivorous Birds: Implications for Floodplain Forest Restoration. Conservation Biology, 16(2), 462-470. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00460.x.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00460.x
  21. Gardner, T.A., Barlow, J., Araujo, I.S., Ávila-Pires, T.C., Bonaldo, A.B., Costa, J.E., Esposito, M.C., Ferreira, L.V., Hawes, J., Hernandez, M.I., Hoogmoed, M.S., Leite, R.N., Lo-Man-Hung, N.F., Malcolm, J.R., Martins, M.B., Mestre, L.A. M., Miranda-Santos, R., Overal, W.L., Parry, L., Peters, S.L., Ribeiro-Junior, M.A., Da Silva, M.N.F., Da Silva Motta, C. & Peres, C.A. (2008). The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecology Letters, 11 (2), 139-150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01133.x10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01133.x18031554
  22. Grime, J. P. (1977). Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its relenance of ecological and evolutionary theory. The American Naturalist, 111(982), 1169-1194.10.1086/283244
  23. Heyman, E. (2010). Clearance of understory in urban woodlands: assessing impact on bird abundance and diversity. For. Ecol. Manag., 260(1), 125-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.011.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.011
  24. Klausnitzer, B. (1990). Ecology of urban fauna. Moscow: Mir (in Russian).
  25. Kurosawa, R. (2009).Disturbance-induced bird diversity in early successional habitats in the humid temperate region of northern Japan. Ecological Research, 24 (3), 687-696. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-008-0539-4.10.1007/s11284-008-0539-4
  26. Lavrov, V.V. & Blinkova., O.I. (2018). Methodological problems of biotic diagnostics of antropogenic transformation of forest ecosystems at the levels of organization of life. Factors of experimental evolution of organisms, 22, 368-373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7124/FEEO.v22.977 (in Ukrainian).10.7124/FEEO.v22.977
  27. MacArthur, R. & MacArthur J. (1961). On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42, 594-598. DOI: 10.2307/1932254.10.2307/1932254
  28. Magurran, E. (1998). Ecological diversity and its measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  29. Mikusinski, G., Gromadzki, M. & Chylarecki, P. (2001). Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. Conserv. Biol., 15(1), 208-217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99236.x.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99236.x
  30. Milne, R. & Bennett, L. (2013). Understanding landscape patterns of temporal variability in avian populations to improve environmental impact assessments. Ecological Informatics, 14, 75-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.11.006.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.11.006
  31. Mirkin, V., Naumova, L. & Solomesh A. (2002). The modern science of vegetation. Moscow: Logos.
  32. Moreno-Rueda, G. & Pizzaro, M. (2009). Relative influence of habitat heterogeneity, climate, human disturbance, and spatial structure on vertebrate species richness in Spain. Ecol. Res., 24(2), 335-344. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-008-0509-x.10.1007/s11284-008-0509-x
  33. Mosyakin, S. & Fedoronchuk, M. (1999). Vascular plants of Ukraine a nomenclatural checklist. Kyiv: MG Kholodny Institute Botany (in Ukrainian).
  34. Novikov, G. (1953). Field studies on the ecology of terrestrial vertebrates. Moscow: Soviet Science (in Russian).
  35. O’Connor, R. (1981). Habitat correlates of bird distribution in British census plots. Studies in Avian Biology, 6, 533-537.
  36. Pereira, P., Godinho, C., Roque, I., Marques, A., Branco, M. & Rabaça, J. E. (2014). Time to rethink the management intensity in a Mediterranean oak woodland: the response of insectivorous birds and leaf-chewing defoliators as key groups in the forest ecosystem. Annals of Forest Science, 71(1), 25-32. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-012-0227-y.10.1007/s13595-012-0227-y
  37. Polyakov, A. (2009). Crimean forest formations and their ecological role. Kharkiv: Nove slovo (in Ukrainian).
  38. Robledano, F., Esteve, M.A., Farinós, P., Carreño M.F. & Martinez-Fernandez, J. (2010) Terrestrial birds as indicators of agricultural-induced changes and associated loss in conservation value of Mediterranean wetlands. Ecological Indicators, 10, 274-286. DOI:1 0.1016/j.ecolind.2009.05.00610.1016/j.ecolind.2009.05.006
  39. Robles, H., Ciudad, C. & Matthysen, E. (2012). Responses to experimental reduction and increase of cavities by a secondary cavity-nesting bird community in cavity-rich Pyrenean oak forests. For. Ecol. Manag., 277, 46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.017.10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.017
  40. Rysin, L. (2003). Monitoring of recreational forests. Moskow: RAN (in Ukrainian).
  41. Šalek, M., Svobodova, J. & Zasadil, P. (2010). Edge effect of low-traffic forest roads on bird communities in secondary production forests in central Europe. Landsc. Ecol., 25(7), 1113-1124. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-010-9487-9.10.1007/s10980-010-9487-9
  42. Sanitary Forest Regulation in Ukraine (2016). Resolution of government of Ukraine. No. 756. Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
  43. Sekercioğlu, C. (2002a). Effects of forestry practices on vegetation structure and bird community of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biol. Conserv., 107(2), 229-240. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00097-6.10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00097-6
  44. Sekercioğlu, C. (2002b). Forest Fragmentation Hits Insectivorous Birds Hard. Directions in Science, 1, 62-64. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2002.190.10.1100/tsw.2002.190
  45. Sekercioğlu, C. (2006). Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends Ecol. Evol., 21(8), 464-471. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.007.10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.00716762448
  46. Shirihai, H., Gargallo, G., Helbig, A., Harris, A. & Cottridge, D. (2001). Sylvia Warblers: Identification, Taxonomy and Phylogeny of the Genus Sylvia. London: Helm.
  47. Shupova, T.V. (2014). Avifauna in settlement zone of Kiev. J. Karazin Kharkiv National Univ. Ser. Biol., 21(1112), 83-91.
  48. Shupova, T.V. (2017). The transformation of the diversity of avifauna under the influence of recreational load. Biosyst. Divers., 25(1), 45-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/011707.10.15421/011707
  49. Virkkala, R. (2006). Why study woodpeckers? The significance of woodpeckers in forest ecosystems. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 43(2), 82-85. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from http://www.sekj.org/PDF/anzf43/anzf43-082.pdf.
  50. Walther, B. (2002). Vertical stratification and use of vegetation and light habitats by Neotropical forest birds. Journal of Ornithology, 143, 64-81. DOI: 10.1007/BF02465460.10.1007/BF02465460
  51. White, J.G., Fitzsimons, J.A., Palmer, G.C. & Antos, M.J. (2009). Surviving urbanisation: maintaining bird species diversity in urban Melbourne. Victorian naturalist, 126(3), 73-78.
  52. Woodley, S.J., Jonson, G., Freedmanm, B. & Kirk, D.A. (2006). Effects of timber harvesting and plantation development on cavity-nesting birds in New Brunswick. Can. Field-Nat., 120, 298-306. DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v120i3.319.10.22621/cfn.v120i3.319
  53. Zhukova, L.A., Eds (2010). Ecological scales and methods for analyzing the ecological diversity of plants. MarSU, Yoshkar-Ola (in Russian).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2020-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1805-4196 | Journal ISSN: 1803-2427
Language: English
Page range: 62 - 78
Submitted on: Mar 27, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jun 20, 2020
|
Published on: Aug 28, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Olena I. Blinkova, Tetiana V. Shupova, Liudmyla A. Raichuk, published by Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.