References
- 1. Neglia D, Rovai D, Caselli C, et al. Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease by Noninvasive Anatomical and Functional Imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8: e002179.
- 2. Dönmez E, Koç M, Şeker T, İçen YK, Çayli M. The assessment of non culprit coronary artery lesions in patients with ST segment elevated myocardial infarction and multivessel disease by control angiography with quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;32:1471-1476.10.1007/s10554-016-0943-8
- 3. Montone RA, Meucci MC, Niccoli G. The management of non-culprit coronary lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020;22:L170-L175.10.1093/eurheartj/suaa175
- 4. Lønborg J, Engstrøm T, Kelbæk H, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10: e004460.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004460
- 5. Kundu A, Sardar P, Kakouros N, et al. Outcomes of multivessel vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Evidence from an updated meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94:70-81.10.1002/ccd.28062
- 6. Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann F-J, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve– Guided Multivessel Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1234-1244.10.1056/NEJMoa1701067
- 7. Park J, Lee JM, Koo B-K, et al. Relevance of anatomical, plaque, and hemodynamic characteristics of non-obstructive coronary lesions in the prediction of risk for acute coronary syndrome. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:6119-6128.10.1007/s00330-019-06221-9
- 8. Mathew RC, Gottbrecht M, Salerno M. Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Coronary Angiography and Intervention. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2018;7:345-354.10.1016/j.iccl.2018.03.008
- 9. Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, et al. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1813-1823.10.1056/NEJMoa1616540
- 10. Lee JM, Choi G, Koo B-K, et al. Identification of High-Risk Plaques Destined to Cause Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1032-1043.10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.023
- 11. Mintz GS, Guagliumi G. Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease. Lancet. 2017;390:793-809.10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8
- 12. von Knebel Doeberitz PL, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, et al. Impact of Coronary Computerized Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification and Machine-Learning Computerized Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve on Adverse Cardiac Outcome. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:1340-1348.10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.06131481177
- 13. Lee JM, Choi G, Koo B-K, et al. Identification of High-Risk Plaques Destined to Cause Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1032-1043.10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.02329550316
- 14. Puchner SB, Mayrhofer T, Park J, et al. Differences in the association of total versus local coronary artery calcium with acute coronary syndrome and culprit lesions in patients with acute chest pain: The coronary calcium paradox. Atherosclerosis. 2018;274:251-257.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.017599957929703635
- 15. Russo M, Kim HO, Kurihara O, et al. Characteristics of non-culprit plaques in acute coronary syndrome patients with layered culprit plaque. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21:1421-1430.10.1093/ehjci/jez30831848590
- 16. Kalra DK, Heo R, Valenti V, Nakazato R, Min JK. Role of Computed Tomography for Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Patients With Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:1144-1154.10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302074412011824723554
- 17. Mester A, Chiţu M, Rat N, et al. CT Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Lesions. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine. 2016;1:237-241.10.1515/jim-2016-0070
- 18. Duguay TM, Tesche C, Vliegenthart R, et al. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Machine Learning for Risk Stratification of Non-Culprit Coronary Narrowings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:1260-1266.10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.00828844517
- 19. Kyhl K, Ahtarovski KA, Nepper-Christensen L, et al. Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit Lesion Only in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:721-730.10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.24831000010
- 20. Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, et al. One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1699-1710.10.1056/NEJMoa180878830145971
- 21. Kolte D, Sardar P, Khera S, et al. Culprit Vessel–Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10: e005582.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.00558229146672
- 22. Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, et al. One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1699-1710.10.1056/NEJMoa180878830145971
- 23. Gershlick AH, Banning AS, Parker E, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Complete Versus Lesion-Only Revascularization in STEMI and Multivessel Disease. Am J Cardiol. 2019;74:3083-3094.10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.03331856964
- 24. Jeger R, Jaguszewski M, Nallamothu BN, et al. Acute multivessel revascularization improves 1-year outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172:76-81.10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.08324461983
- 25. Dziewierz A, Siudak Z, Rakowski T, Zasada W, Dubiel JS, Dudek D. Impact of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and Noninfarct-Related Artery Revascularization on Outcome of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the EUROTRANSFER Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:342-347.10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.02920643243
- 26. de Waha S, Jobs A, Eitel I, et al. Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018;7:28-37.10.1177/204887261771964028703046
- 27. Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, et al. Randomized Trial of Preventive Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1115-1123.10.1056/NEJMoa130552023991625
- 28. Elfaramawy A, Hassan M, Nagy M, ElGuindy A, Elmahdy MF. Impact of fractional flow reserve on decision-making in daily clinical practice: A single center experience in Egypt. Egypt Heart J. 2018;70:161-165.10.1016/j.ehj.2017.12.007612334130190641
- 29. Baumann AAW, Mishra A, Worthley MI, Nelson AJ, Psaltis PJ. Management of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a complex path to precision medicine. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020;11:204062232093852.10.1177/2040622320938527733177032655848
- 30. Piróth Z, Boxma-de Klerk BM, Omerovic E, et al. The Natural History of Nonculprit Lesions in STEMI. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:954-961.10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.01532327091
- 31. Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, et al. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(19):1813-1823.10.1056/NEJMoa161654028317438
- 32. Hlatky MA, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. Quality-of-Life and Economic Outcomes of Assessing Fractional Flow Reserve With Computed Tomography Angiography: PLATFORM. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2315-2323.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.05126475205
- 33. Lee SH, Choi KH, Lee JM, et al. Physiologic Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Discordance Between FFR and iFR. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2019;12(20):2018-2031.10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.04431563683
- 34. Lee JM, Doh J-H, Nam C-W, Shin E-S, Koo B-K. Functional Approach for Coronary Artery Disease: Filling the Gap Between Evidence and Practice. Korean Circ J. 2018;48(3):179.10.4070/kcj.2017.0393586131029557104
- 35. Dey D, Gaur S, Ovrehus KA, et al. Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(6):2655-2664.10.1007/s00330-017-5223-z594053729352380