Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ultrasound-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Lesions Cover

Ultrasound-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Lesions

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. 1. Romania in Global Cancer Statistics 2018. Oncology Today. Available at: https://www.medichub.ro/reviste/oncolog-hematolog-ro/romania-in-global-cancer-statistics-2018-id-2019-cmsid-68.
  2. 2. Tereanu C, Baili P, Berrino F, et al. Recent trends of cancer mortality in Romanian adults: Mortality is still increasing, although young adults do better than the middle-aged and elderly population. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2013;22:199-209.10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283581d9022968450
  3. 3. Gøtzsche PC, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Brodersen J, Jørgensen KJ. Breast screening: The facts - Or maybe not. BMJ. 2009;338:446-448.10.1136/bmj.b8619174442
  4. 4. Cardoso F, Cataliotti L, Costa A, et al. European Breast Cancer Conference manifesto on breast centres/units. Eur J Cancer. 2017;72:244-250.10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.02328064097
  5. 5. Travasso C. Panel issues advice on early detection of oral, breast, and cervical cancers in India. BMJ. 2015;351:h3807.10.1136/bmj.h380726170274
  6. 6. Britton P, Sinnatamby R. Investigation of suspected breast cancer. Br Med J. 2007;335:347-348.10.1136/bmj.39234.386470.BE194946017703045
  7. 7. John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science. Core-Needle Biopsy for Breast Abnormalities. In: Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians. 2007. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27336126.
  8. 8. National Guideline Alliance (UK). Early and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Diagnosis and Management.2018. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519155/.
  9. 9. Jeibouei S, Akbari ME, Kalbasi A, et al. Personalized medicine in breast cancer : pharmacogenomics approaches. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2019;12:59-73.10.2147/PGPM.S167886654974731213877
  10. 10. Chan CWH, Law BMH, So WKW, Chow KM, Waye MMY. Novel Strategies on Personalized Medicine for Breast Cancer Treatment: An Update. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2324.10.3390/ijms18112423571339129140300
  11. 11. Balic M, Thomssen C, Würstlein R, Gnant M, Harbeck N. St. Gallen/Vienna 2019: A brief summary of the consensus discussion on the optimal primary breast cancer treatment. Breast Care. 2019;14:103-110.10.1159/000499931688610831798382
  12. 12. Morigi C. Tailored Treatments for Patients With Early Breast Cancer. ecancer. 2017;11:1-12.10.3332/ecancer.2017.732540622228491135
  13. 13. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver M. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. Fourth Edition, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press.; 2012.
  14. 14. Who Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Breast Tumours. Lyon (France) Internation Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019. (WHO Classification of Tumours Series, 5th Ed.; Vol. 2).
  15. 15. Hoon Tan P, Ellis I, Allison K, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the breast. Histopathology. 2020. [Ahead of print]
  16. 16. Fitzgibbons PL, Connolly JL, Edgerton M, MD, Simpson MR. Protocol for the examination of specimens From patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020. [Ahead of print]
  17. 17. Untch M, Gerber B, Harbeck N, et al. 13th St. Gallen international breast cancer conference 2013: Primary therapy of early breast cancer evidence, controversies, consensus - Opinion of a German team of experts (Zurich 2013). Breast Care. 2013;8:221-229.10.1159/000351692372863424415975
  18. 18. Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1194-1220.10.1093/annonc/mdz173
  19. 19. Jorns JM. Challenges in routine estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2/neu evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143:1444-1449.10.5858/arpa.2019-0205-RA
  20. 20. Fitzgibbons PL, Bartley AN, Connolly JL. Template for reporting results of biomarker testing of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020. [Ahead of print]
  21. 21. Bucure C. Luna Internațională de C onștientizare d espre Cancerul de Sân (LICCS) 1-31 Octombrie 2019 Analiza de Situație. 2019:1-16. Available at: http://insp.gov.ro/sites/cnepss/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Analiza-desituatie.pdf.
  22. 22. Pant K, Dutta U. Understanding and management of male breast cancer: A critical review. Med Oncol. 2008;25:294-298.10.1007/s12032-007-9034-y
  23. 23. Schünemann HJ, Lerda D, Quinn C, et al. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis: A synopsis of the european breast guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172:46-56.10.7326/M19-2125
  24. 24. Güth U, Huang DJ, Huber M, et al. Tumor size and detection in breast cancer: Self-examination and clinical breast examination are at their limit. Cancer Detect Prev. 2008;32:224-228.10.1016/j.cdp.2008.04.002
  25. 25. Shaevitch D, Taghipour S, Miller A, Montgomery N, Harvey B. Tumor size distribution of invasive breast cancers and the sensitivity of screening methods in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13:562-569.
  26. 26. European Comission E. Breast Cancer and Cervical Cancer Screenings.; 2017. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20200109-1.
  27. 27. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer. 1989;63:181-187.10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO;2-H
  28. 28. Orang E, Marzony ET, Afsharfard A. Predictive role of tumor size in breast cancer with axillary lymph node involvement - can size of primary tumor be used to omit an unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection? Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:717-722.
  29. 29. Michaelson JS, Silverstein M, Sgroi D, et al. The Effect of Tumor Size and Lymph Node Status on Breast Carcinoma Lethality. Cancer. 2003;98:2133-2143.10.1002/cncr.11765
  30. 30. Narod SA. Tumour size predicts long-term survival among women with lymph node-positive breast cancer. Curr Oncol Vol. 2012;19:249-253.10.3747/co.19.1043
  31. 31. Laura S, Coombs NJ, Ung O, Boyages J. Tumour size as a predictor of axillary node metastases in patients with breast cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76:1002-1006.10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03918.x
  32. 32. Sopik V, Narod SA. The relationship between tumour size, nodal status and distant metastases: on the origins of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170:647-656.10.1007/s10549-018-4796-9
  33. 33. Rambau P, Chalya P, Manyama M, Jackson K. Pathological features of Breast Cancer seen in Northwestern Tanzania: A nine years retrospective study. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:214.10.1186/1756-0500-4-214315583521696617
  34. 34. Bonnier P, Romain S, Charpin C, et al. Age as a prognostic factor in breast cancer: Relationship to pathologic and biologic features. Int J Cancer. 1995;62:138-144.10.1002/ijc.29106202057622286
  35. 35. Alieldin NH, Abo-Elazm OM, Bilal D, et al. Age at diagnosis in women with non-metastatic breast cancer: Is it related to prognosis? J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2014;26:23-30.
  36. 36. Nelson H, Zakher B, Cantor A, et al. Risk Factors for Breast Cancer for Women Aged 40 to 49 Years A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:635-648.10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00006356146722547473
  37. 37. Brewer HR, Jones ME, Schoemaker MJ, Ashworth A, Swerdlow AJ. Family history and risk of breast cancer: an analysis accounting for family structure. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165:193-200.10.1007/s10549-017-4325-2551131328578505
  38. 38. Rummel S, Hueman MT, Costantino N, Shriver CD, Ellsworth RE. Tumour location within the breast: Does tumour site have prognostic ability? Ecancermedicalscience. 2015;9:1-10.
  39. 39. Kroman N, Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen HT, Melbye M. Influence of tumor location on breast cancer prognosis. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:542-545.10.1002/ijc.1111612712447
  40. 40. Sohn VY, Arthurs ZM, Sebesta JA, Brown TA. Primary tumor location impacts breast cancer survival. Am J Surg. 2008;195:641-644.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.03918424280
  41. 41. Geisel J, Raghu M, Hooley R. The Role of Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening: The Case for and Against Ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound, CT MRI. 2018;39:25-34.10.1053/j.sult.2017.09.00629317037
  42. 42. Jacklyn G, McGeechan K, Houssami N, Bell K, Glasziou PP, Barratt A. Overdiagnosis due to screening mammography for women aged 40 years and over. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018:CD013076.10.1002/14651858.CD013076
  43. 43. HD N, A C, L H, et al. Screening for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. In: Evidence Syntheses. Vol 124.; 2016. Available at: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/26889531.
  44. 44. Makki J. Diversity of breast carcinoma: Histological subtypes and clinical relevance. Clin Med Insights Pathol. 2015;8:23-31.10.4137/CPath.S31563468932626740749
  45. 45. Klimberg VS., Rivere A. Ultrasound image-guided core biopsy of the breast. Chinese Clin Oncol. 2016;5:1-9.
  46. 46. Julia Y.S. Tsang P and GMT. Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer. Adv Anat Pathol. 2020;27(1):27-35.10.1097/PAP.000000000000023231045583
  47. 47. Hamza AA, Idris SA, Al-haj MB, Mohammed AA. Prognostication of breast cancer using Nottingham Prognostic Index in Sudanese patients. 2014;2:1-5.
  48. 48. Thomas JSJ, Kerr GR, Jack WJL, et al. Histological grading of invasive breast carcinoma - A simplification of existing methods in a large conservation series with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 2009;55:724-731.10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03429.x19845790
  49. 49. Megha T, Neri A, Malagnino V, et al. Traditional and new prognosticators in breast cancer: Nottingham index, Mib-1 and estrogen receptor signaling remain the best predictors of relapse and survival in a series of 289 cases. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;9:266-273.10.4161/cbt.9.4.1065920026902
  50. 50. Oluogun WA, Adedokun KA, Oyenike MA, Adeyeba OA. Histological classification, grading, staging, and prognostic indexing of female breast cancer in an African population: A 10-year retrospective study. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2019;13:3-9.
  51. 51. Salhia B, Tapia C, Ishak EA, et al. Molecular subtype analysis determines the association of advanced breast cancer in Egypt with favorable biology. BMC Womens Health. 2011;11:44.10.1186/1472-6874-11-44320428321961708
  52. 52. Kermani T, Kermani I, Faham Z, Dolatkhah R. Ki-67 status in patients with primary breast cancer and its relationship with other prognostic factors. Biomed Res Ther. 2019;6(2 SE-Research articles).10.15419/bmrat.v6i2.520
  53. 53. Kasangian AA, Gherardi G, Biagioli E, et al. The prognostic role of tumor size in early breast cancer in the era of molecular biology. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0189127.10.1371/journal.pone.0189127571850529211792
  54. 54. Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, et al. Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:290-303.10.3322/caac.2139328294295
  55. 55. Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, et al. Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1346-1366.10.1200/JCO.19.0230931928404
  56. 56. Kuijer A, King TA. Age, molecular subtypes and local therapy decision-making. Breast. 2017;34:S70-S77.10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.03228666919
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jim-2020-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2501-8132 | Journal ISSN: 2501-5974
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 55
Submitted on: May 19, 2020
Accepted on: May 25, 2020
Published on: Jul 6, 2020
Published by: Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Kincső-Zsófia Lőrincz, Zsuzsánna Pap, Simona Lileana Mocan, Csanád-Endre Lőrincz, Beáta-Ágota Baróti, published by Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.