Have a personal or library account? Click to login
CTA Evaluation of Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Coronary Stents – a Feasibility Study Cover

CTA Evaluation of Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Coronary Stents – a Feasibility Study

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. 1. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541-2619.10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278
  2. 2. Ferent I, Mester A, Hlinomaz O, et al. Intracoronary Imaging for Assessment of Vascular Healing and Stent Follow-up in Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds. Current Medical Imaging Reviews. 2018. [Epub Ahead of Print.] doi : 10.2174/1573405614666180604093621.10.2174/1573405614666180604093621
  3. 3. Gruntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:61-68.10.1056/NEJM197907123010201
  4. 4. Sigwart U, Urban P, Golf S, et al. Emergency stenting for acute occlusion after coronary balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 1988;78:1121-1127.10.1161/01.CIR.78.5.1121
  5. 5. Roubin GS, Cannon AD, Agrawal SK, et al. Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1992;85:916-927.10.1161/01.CIR.85.3.916
  6. 6. Benedek I, Benedek T. Angio computer tomografie multislice în diagnosticul bolilor cardiovasculare. Oradea: Editura Universității, 2014.
  7. 7. Raber L, Brugaletta S, Yamaji K, et al. Very late scaffold thrombosis: intracoronary imaging and histopathological and spectroscopic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1901-1914.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.853
  8. 8. Gao R, Yang Y, Han Y, et al. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB China Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2298-2309.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.054
  9. 9. Lemos PA, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT, et al. Unrestricted Utilization of Serolimus-Elutiing Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World”: The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry. Circulation. 2004;109:190-195.10.1161/01.CIR.0000109138.84579.FA
  10. 10. Kate FM, Morris SD, Smith HR, Rycroft RJ. Allergy in coronary in-stent restenosis. Lancet. 2001;357:1205-1206.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04350-6
  11. 11. Benedek T, Bucur O, Pascanu I, Benedek I. Analysis of coronary plaque morphology by 64 multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Endocrinologica. 2011;7:59-68.10.4183/aeb.2011.59
  12. 12. Benedek I, Chitu M, Kovacs I, Bajka B, Benedek T. Incremental Value of preprocedural Coronary Computed Tomographic Angyography to classical Coronary Angiography for prediction of PCI complexity in left main stenosis. World Journal of Cardiovascular Disease. 2013;9:573-580.10.4236/wjcd.2013.39090
  13. 13. Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque quantification by coronary CT and intravascular ultrasound identifies a low CT density core as a marker of plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014:55:22-28.10.1536/ihj.13-21324463925
  14. 14. Benedek T, Gyongyosi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164
  15. 15. Collet C, Chevalier B, Cequier A, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:722-732.10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.01328734923
  16. 16. Chien S. Mechanotransduction and endothelial cell homeostasis: the wisdom of the cell. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H1209-H1224.10.1152/ajpheart.01047.200617098825
  17. 17. Oncel D, Oncel G, Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience. Radiology. 2007;242:403-409.10.1148/radiol.242206006517255411
  18. 18. Rist C, von Ziegler F, Nikolaou K, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Academic Radiology. 2006;13:1465-1473.10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.04417138114
  19. 19. De Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, Van Velzen JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:331-340.10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa31220404736
  20. 20. Pelberg R. Basic principles in Computed Tomography (CT). Cardiac CT angiography manual. London: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-1-4471-6690-0
  21. 21. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation. 2009;120:867-875.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.85928019704093
  22. 22. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:234-243.10.1007/s00330-007-0756-117929024
  23. 23. Dawoud MA, Alarabawy RA, Abd Alla TM, Mubarak AA. Evaluation of coronary stents using multidetector CT. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2016;47:793-801.10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.05.002
  24. 24. Yoshimura M, Nao T, Miura T, et al. New quantitative method to diagnose coronary in-stent restenosis by 64-multislice computed tomography. J Cardiol. 2015;65:57-62.10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.03.01324846389
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jim-2018-0033 | Journal eISSN: 2501-8132 | Journal ISSN: 2501-5974
Language: English
Page range: 152 - 159
Submitted on: Aug 4, 2018
Accepted on: Sep 10, 2018
Published on: Dec 19, 2018
Published by: Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Ioan Ferenț, András Mester, Monica Chițu, Annabella Benedek, Mihaela Rațiu, Roxana Hodas, Imre Benedek, published by Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.