References
- 1. Nădăşan V. The Quality of Online Health-Related Information – an Emergent Consumer Health Issue. Acta Medica Marisiensis. 2016;62:408-421.
- 2. Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:671-692.
- 3. Fahy E, Hardikar R, Fox A, Mackay S. Quality of patient health information on the Internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape. Australas Med J. 2014;7:24-28.
- 4. Health On the NET. The HONcode Principles. Available at: https://www.hon.ch/en/certification.html#principles (1 August 2018)
- 5. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health Related Websites. J Med Internet Res. 2002;4:E15.
- 6. The DISCERN Project. Available at: http://www.discern.org.uk/background_to_discern.php (1 August 2018)
- 7. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA. 1997;277:1244-1245.
- 8. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Zullino D, Khan R. HON label and DISCERN as content quality indicators of health-related websites. Psychiatr Q. 2012;83:15-27.
- 9. Barker S, Charlton NP, Holstege CP. Accuracy of internet recommendations for prehospital care of venomous snake bites. Wilderness Environ Med. 2010;21:298-302.
- 10. Santana S, Lausen B, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki CE, Prokosch HU, Wynn R. Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:20.
- 11. Nădăşan V. Should Critical Care Professionals Take Hoaxes/Rumours Seriously? J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2016;2:205-206.
- 12. Nădăşan V, Roşca AN, Tarcea M, Ábrám Z, Măruşteri M. The Quality of Romanian Breast Cancer Websites: a Five-Year Longitudinal Assessment. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33:703-707.
- 13. Nădăşan V, Moldovan O. The Completeness and Accuracy of Information about Coeliac Disease on the Romanian Websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods. 2016;11:70-76.
- 14. Nădăşan V, Ábrám Z. How credible are the Romanian health-related websites? A cross-sectional study. Acta Medica Transilvanica. 2016;21:1-4.
- 15. Nădăşan V, Voidăzan S, Tarcea M, Ureche R. The quality of the information about influenza on the Romanian Internet. Acta Medica Transilvanica. 2011; 2:312-314.
- 16. Nădăşan V, Vancea G, Georgescu PA, Tarcea M, Abram Z. The credibility, completeness and accuracy of information about first aid in case of choking on the Romanian Websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods. 2011;6:18-26.
- 17. Nădăşan V, Moldovan G, Tarcea M, Ureche R. Edified or confused? How complete and accurate is the information about vitamin B12 on the Romanian Websites? Revista de Igienă şi Sănătate Publică Timişoara. 2011;61:49-57.
- 18. Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2000;321:1511-1515.
- 19. Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe PM, Latthe M, Khan KS. Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. BMJ. 2002;324:581-582.
- 20. Statcounter. Available at: http://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/romania (2 August 2018)
- 21. Granka LA, Joachims T, Gay G (2004) Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search. Available at: https://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/tj/publications/granka_etal_04a.pdf (1 Aug 2018)