Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Carotid Ultrasonography in Patients with High Risk of Atherosclerosis Cover

The Role of Carotid Ultrasonography in Patients with High Risk of Atherosclerosis

Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. 1. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Wilson PW, et al. One-year cardiovascular event rates in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2007;291:1197-1206.10.1001/jama.297.11.119717374814
  2. 2. McGill Jr, Henry C. Risk factors for atherosclerosis. The Thrombotic Process in Atherogenesis. Springer. 1978;104:273-280.10.1007/978-1-4684-7787-0_15
  3. 3. Vrselja Z, Brkic H, Mrdenovic S, Radic R, Curic G. Function of circle of Willis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:578-584.10.1038/jcbfm.2014.7398210124473483
  4. 4. Willeit J, Stefan K. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. A population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13;661-668.10.1161/01.ATV.13.5.6618485116
  5. 5. Piotr S, Joshua B. Carotid Artery Disease. Circulation. 2006;114:244-247.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.542860
  6. 6. Walker M, Marler R, Goldstein M, et al. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1421-1428.10.1001/jama.1995.03520420037035
  7. 7. Griggs R, Bluth E. Noninvasive risk assessment for stroke: special emphasis on carotid atherosclerosis, sex-related differences, and the development of an effective screening strategy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:259-264.10.2214/AJR.10.555521257875
  8. 8. Kakisis, JD, Avgerinos ED, Antonopoulos CN, et al. The European society of vascular surgery guidelines for carotid intervention: an updated independent assessment and literature review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:238-243.10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.01522658616
  9. 9. Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;91:566-579.10.1161/01.CIR.91.2.566
  10. 10. Adla T, Adlova R. Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis. Int J Angiol. 2015;24:179-184.10.1055/s-0035-1556056457201326417185
  11. 11. Loizou CP. A review of ultrasound common carotid artery image and video segmentation techniques. Springer. 2014;52:1073-1093.10.1007/s11517-014-1203-525284219
  12. 12. Adla T, Adlova R. Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis. Int J Angiol. 2015;24:179-184.10.1055/s-0035-1556056
  13. 13. Serena J, Irimia P, Calleja S, Blanco M, Vivancos J, Ayo-Martín Ó. Cuantificación ultrasonográfica de la estenosis carotídea: recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Neurosonología. Neurología. 2013;28:435-442.10.1016/j.nrl.2012.07.01123040716
  14. 14. AbuRahma AF, Wulu Jr JT, Crotty B. Carotid plaque ultrasonic heterogeneity and severity of stenosis. Stroke. 2002;33:1772-1775.10.1161/01.STR.0000019127.11189.B5
  15. 15. Polak JF, Shemanski L, O’Leary DH, et al. Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology. 1998;208:649-654.10.1148/radiology.208.3.97228419722841
  16. 16. Prabhakaran S, Rundek T, Ramas R, et al. Carotid Plaque Surface Irregularity Predicts Ischemic Stroke The Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2006;37:2696-2701.10.1161/01.STR.0000244780.82190.a4265432417008627
  17. 17. Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP. Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2000;31:615-621.10.1161/01.STR.31.3.615
  18. 18. Brinjikji W, Huston III J, Rabinstein A, et al. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:27-42.10.3171/2015.1.JNS14245226230478
  19. 19. Lee W. General principles of carotid Doppler ultrasonography. Ultrasonography. 2014;33:11-17.10.14366/usg.13018405896924936490
  20. 20. Sitzer M, Fürst G, Fischer H, et al. Between-method correlation in quantifying internal carotid stenosis. Stroke. 1993;24:1513-1518.10.1161/01.STR.24.10.15138378955
  21. 21. Alexandrov A, Brodie DS, McLean A, et al. Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke. 1997;28:339-342.10.1161/01.STR.28.2.339
  22. 22. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis – Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology. 2003;229:340-346.10.1148/radiol.229203051614500855
  23. 23. Oates CP, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T, et al. Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:251-261.10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.01519046904
  24. 24. Evans NS. Carotid Artery Stenosis. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2016;24:47-56.
  25. 25. Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:16-94.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.00621288679
  26. 26. Tahmasebpour HR, Buckley AR, Cooperberg PL, Fix CH. Sonographic examination of the carotid arteries. Radiographics. 2005;25:1561-1575.10.1148/rg.25604501316284135
  27. 27. Boontje AH. External carotid artery revascularization: indications, operative techniques and results. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;33:315-318.
  28. 28. Päivänsalo MJ, Siniluoto TM, Tikkakoski TA, Myllylä V, Suramo IJ. Duplex US of the external carotid artery. Acta Radiologica. 1996;37:41-45.10.1177/02841851960371P1088611322
  29. 29. Ricotta A, AbuRahma E, Ascher M, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery. Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1-3.10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.03121889701
  30. 30. Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke. 2003;34:660-664.10.1161/01.STR.0000057462.02141.6F12624288
  31. 31. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001;220:179-185.10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3517911425993
  32. 32. Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, et al. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology. 2004;63:457-460.10.1212/01.WNL.0000135154.53953.2C15304575
  33. 33. Cumming MJ, Morrow IM. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:517-522.10.2214/ajr.163.3.80798368079836
  34. 34. Mester A, Oltean-Péter B, Rodean I, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Function Following Intracoronary and Intramyocardial Stem Cell Injection. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine. 2017;2:112-116.10.1515/jim-2017-0053
  35. 35. Inzitari D, Eliasziw M, Gates P, et al. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1693-1700.10.1056/NEJM200006083422302
  36. 36. Fox Allan J. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology. 1993;186:316-318.10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421726
  37. 37. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445-453.10.1056/NEJM199108153250701
  38. 38. European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991;337:1235-1243.10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-P
  39. 39. Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, et al. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Stroke. 1994;25:2440-2444.10.1161/01.STR.25.12.2440
  40. 40. Saba L, Giorgio M. A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids: evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:42-47.10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.06419464837
  41. 41. Staikov IN, Arnold M, Mattle H, et al. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. J Neurol. 2000;247:681-686.10.1007/s00415007011011081806
  42. 42. Craven TE, Ryu JE, Espeland MA, et al. Evaluation of the associations between carotid artery atherosclerosis and coronary artery stenosis. A case-control study. Circulation. 1990;82:1230-1242.10.1161/01.CIR.82.4.12302205416
  43. 43. Salonen JT, Riitta S. Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:1245-1249.10.1161/01.ATV.11.5.1245
  44. 44. Jashari F, Ibrahimi P, Nicoll R. Coronary and carotid atherosclerosis: similarities and differences. Atherosclerosis. 2013;227:193-200.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.11.00823218802
  45. 45. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, et al. The role of carotid arterial intima-media thickness in predicting clinical coronary events. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:262-269.10.7326/0003-4819-128-4-199802150-00002
  46. 46. Kablak-Ziembicka A, Tracz W, Przewlocki T, et al. Association of increased carotid intima-media thickness with the extent of coronary artery disease. Heart. 2004;90:1286-1290.10.1136/hrt.2003.025080
  47. 47. Lester SJ, Eleid MF, Khandheria BK, Hurst RT. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Coronary Artery Calcium Score as Indications of Subclinical Atherosclerosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:229-233.10.4065/84.3.229
  48. 48. Ikeda N, Kogame N, Iijima R, Nakamura M, Sugi K. Impact of carotid artery ultrasound and ankle-brachial index on prediction of severity of SYNTAX score. Circ J. 2013;77:712-716.10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1087
  49. 49. Oei HH, Vliegenthart R, Hak AE, et al. The association between coronary calcification assessed by electron beam computed tomography and measures of extracoronary atherosclerosis: the Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1745-1751.10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01853-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jim-2018-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2501-8132 | Journal ISSN: 2501-5974
Language: English
Page range: 229 - 233
Submitted on: Aug 6, 2018
Accepted on: Sep 4, 2018
Published on: Jan 31, 2019
Published by: Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Balázs Oltean-Péter, István Kovács, Monica Chițu, Imre Benedek, published by Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.