Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Moving beyond limitations: A narrative review exploring the intersection of haemophilia and physical activity Cover

Moving beyond limitations: A narrative review exploring the intersection of haemophilia and physical activity

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Associations between progression of goals in physical activity and patient-relevant outcomes for PwHNote: Progression of goals in physical activity and associations with patient-relevant outcomes are not always sequential or linear. General figure concept inspired by Skinner MW, et al. Haemophilia 2020;26(1):17–24 [107].Abbreviations: PwH, persons with haemophilia
Associations between progression of goals in physical activity and patient-relevant outcomes for PwHNote: Progression of goals in physical activity and associations with patient-relevant outcomes are not always sequential or linear. General figure concept inspired by Skinner MW, et al. Haemophilia 2020;26(1):17–24 [107].Abbreviations: PwH, persons with haemophilia

Figure 2.

Behavioural change techniques to encourage maintenance of physical activity in PwH
Content adapted from Blokzijl J, et al. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2021;5(8):e12639 [34].
Abbreviations: PA, physical activity, PwH, persons with haemophilia.
Behavioural change techniques to encourage maintenance of physical activity in PwH Content adapted from Blokzijl J, et al. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2021;5(8):e12639 [34]. Abbreviations: PA, physical activity, PwH, persons with haemophilia.

Resources providing recommendations for physical activity, exercise, and sports among persons with haemophilia

CANADIAN HEMOPHILIA SOCIETY (2012) [11, 14]NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION (2005 & 2017) [12, 13]WORLD FEDERATION OF HEMOPHILIA (2020) [5]
LevelNational (Canada)National (United States)International
PrinciplesShared decision-making to consider individual risks preferences, and health statusEmphasises shared decision-making; age-appropriate, risk-appropriate, and supervised PA; and timing of treatment relative to PAAdvocates individualised, monitored, and comprehensive approach to PA to manage unique individual needs
Approach and overall contentsAvoids ‘one size fits all’ approach and acknowledges no activity is risk-free Provides ‘in the driver’s seat’ steps to support patients individualising engagement in PA:
  • Assess yourself

  • Choose PA that works for you

  • Reduce the risk

  • Make an activity plan

Overview, risk rating, and safety information pertaining to each exercise/activity/sport Risk ratings:
  • Low risk (1)

  • Low-moderate risk (1.5)

  • Moderate risk (2)

  • Moderate-high risk (2.5)

  • High risk (3)

Recommends:
  • Adapted PA in diverse settings with available resources

  • Includes those without access to prophylaxis

General recommendations for PAConsiderations:
  • Form of benefit the patient is seeking

  • Ability for family to engage in activity together

  • Whether there is a target joint

  • If there is a target joint, whether specific sports are a risk to it

  • Best time to infuse factors relative to PA

Considerations:
  • General health

  • Bleeding history

  • Condition of joints

  • How joints respond to treatment

  • Patient recommendations:

  • Set goals

  • Ensure activities are supervised

  • Follow instructions to reduce injury

  • Warm-up prior to activity

  • Age-appropriate recommendations are provided for toddlers, preschoolers, school-age children, teens, and adults

Regular PA and fitness with specific attention to:
  • Bone health

  • Muscle strengthening

  • Coordination

  • Physical function/condition

  • Ability

  • Preference/interests

  • Local customs/available resources

  • Healthy body weight

  • Positive self-esteem

  • Weight-bearing PA is encouraged to promote bone density and joint health

Activity, exercise, or sport selectionConsiderations:
  • Health condition

  • Reflexes and coordination

  • Team versus individual sports

  • Supervised activity

  • Speed

  • Contact

  • Skill level

  • Position on the team

  • Plans for advancing in the sport

  • Protective gear

  • Training

  • Cost of activity/gear

  • Modifications to activity

Organised sports tend to be better supervised, but should use judgement and weigh risks versus interests

    Sport selection considerations:

  • Age

  • Family situation

  • Current activity level

  • Sport safety rating

  • Bleeding history

  • Joint health

  • Environmental factors

    Conditioning program focused on:

  • Improving muscle function, flexibility, strength, and endurance

  • Stretching, warmup, and cooldown

  • Gradual, targeted strength training

Recommendations:
  • Non-contact sports (e.g., swimming, jogging, golf, rowing, etc.) over high-contact and collision sports (e.g., soccer, hockey, rugby, boxing, etc.) and high-velocity sports (e.g., skiing)

  • Organised sports over unstructured sports

  • Avoid high-contact, collision, and high-velocity sports unless patient has a sufficient prophylactic regimen and education on risks and protective measures

Protective equipmentEmphasises the importance of proper protective gear that supports joints or musclesRecommends ensuring use of properly fitted safety equipment specific to the sport of interestEmphasises importance of protecting target joints with braces/splints during PA, especially without factor coverage
Consulting with healthcare team and trainersRecommends that members of the HTC comprehensive care team (haemophilia nurse, physician, physiotherapist, psychologist) be involved in shared decision-making about what is realistic and safeRecommends meeting with HCP (e.g., physical therapist) for evaluation and training program discussion prior to engagement in PA, focusing on:
  • Identifying and managing bleeding episodes

  • Rehabilitation requirements and safe re-introduction of activity following a bleeding episode

Providers may adjust infusion schedule/dosing/prophylactic factor replacement according to activity
Consult with a physical therapist or musculoskeletal specialist prior to participating in PA or sport to discuss:
  • Patient’s condition

  • Physical skills

  • Protective gear requirements

  • Appropriateness of specific sports

Ensure ongoing patient and caregiver education regarding PA implications and responsible participation

Factor levels and risk of bleeding events during PA in PwH: Evidence from real-world studies

AUTHORSTUDY DESCRIPTIONPHYSICAL ACTIVITYFACTOR LEVELS/TIMING OF INFUSIONINCIDENCE OF PA-INDUCED BLEEDING
Tomschi et al. (2024) [25]Prospective, 12-month, observational study in PwHA (moderate to severe) aged ≥16 years N=231,011 PA sessions categorised by NBDF risk levels:
  • 795 Cat I

  • 193 Cat II

  • 23 Cat III

Measured at start of PA:
  • 29.8% Cat I

  • 38.3% Cat II

  • 86.6% Cat III

3 events:
  • 2 knee hemarthroses during fitness training; FVIII levels ~1% at start of PA

  • 1 knee hemarthrosis during alpine ski fall; FVIII levels ~55% at start of PA

Versloot et al. (2023) [21]Single-centre, prospective, 12-month study in PwH (mild to severe) aged 6–49 years without inhibitors N=12515,999 PA sessions 59% of PwH engaged in high-risk sports (according to NBDF risk levels) and 20% high-intensity (>6 METs) 6% at time of injury with SIB vs. 12.3% without SIB (p<0.03)26 events:
  • 14 (54%) during high-risk sports

  • 6 (23%) during high-intensity sports

Bukkems et al. (2023) [21]Single-centre, prospective, 12-month observational study in PwHA (mild to severe) aged 7–50 years N=11214,162 PA sessions5.9% (range 0–20) during SIB vs. 11.0% (range 0–95) without SIB20 events (not described in detail)
Konkle et al. (2021) [49]
  • Multicentre, prospective, 6-month observational study in PwHA (moderate to severe) aged 11–58 years

  • N=54

Participation in PA sessions according to NBDF risk levels:
  • 75.5% low

  • 9.8% low-to-moderate

  • 18.8% moderate

  • 6.6% moderate-to-high

  • 3.9% high

Time between infusion and start of PA:
  • 64.7% >24 hours

  • 27.8% 1–2 days

  • 37.3% 3–4 days

  • 9.6% ≥5 days

75 events (not described in detail) Mean SIB events per PwH:
  • 1.26 (prophylaxis patients)

  • 2.29 (on-demand patients)

Ai et al. (2022) [48]
  • Single-centre, retrospective cohort study in paediatric PwHA (moderate or severe) aged 3–15 years

  • N=105

373 PA sessions categorised by NBDF risk levels:
  • 57.6% low

  • 42.4% medium

  • 0% high

373 PA sessions Median trough levels:
  • 6.1% for low-risk PA

  • 9.1% for medium-risk

  • 2.7% during low-risk SIB

  • 3.4% during medium-risk SIB

34 events in 19 patients:
  • 23 ankle

  • 9 knee

  • 2 elbow

Patient case example illustrating practical applications of guidelines, use of prophylaxis, and the role of the haemophilia treatment centre to promote physical activity in PwH

CASE COMPONENTDESCRIPTION
Target joint considerationsA 24-year-old male with severe haemophilia A (FVIII <1%) and no history of inhibitors presents to the HTC to discuss optimising his care for increased PA. He has a history of a left ankle target joint from recurrent bleeding in childhood and adolescence but has remained bleed free for several years on prophylaxis with an EHL FVIII concentrate.
Tailoring management around different risk activitiesThe patient has recently taken up recreational soccer and weightlifting and wants to ensure he is adequately protected while maintaining joint health. To personalise the patient’s prophylaxis regimen, he undergoes a pharmacokinetic study of his EHL FVIII concentrate. His results show a peak factor level of 80% post-infusion of 40 IU/kg and a half-life of 16 hours.
Adjustments in prophylaxis for individualised managementBased on these findings, the patient adjusts his infusion schedule, administering factor immediately before soccer matches to maximise protection and tailoring doses to sustain adequate coverage for weightlifting sessions. On average, he requires five infusions per week to maintain his desired level of PA.
Evolution in prophylaxis for management of haemophilia and impact on PAThree years after the patient’s EHL FVIII concentrate infusion schedule adjustments, he transitions to emicizumab prophylaxis, reducing his infusion burden while maintaining excellent bleed protection. With this regimen, he continues soccer and weightlifting and, through shared decision-making with his HTC team, incorporates outdoor rock climbing into his routine.
Involving physiotherapists and other HTC comprehensive care team members in management to support participation in sportThe patient’s HTC team emphasises ongoing joint health monitoring and provides guidance participation in higher-risk activities. To ensure his musculoskeletal needs are adequately addressed, he meets regularly with his HTC team, including physiotherapists and haematologists, to assess joint function, optimise his treatment plan, and incorporate strategies for injury prevention and long-term joint health.

Studies evaluating the impact of non-factor and gene therapies on PA-related outcomes in PwH

AUTHORSTUDY DESCRIPTIONPA-RELATED OUTCOMES
Emicizumab
Shima et al. (2019) [64]Multicentre, open-label, Phase III HOHOEMI study in Japanese paediatric PwHA (severe) aged <12 years on emicizumab N=13
  • Increase in number of patients and time (in minutes/week) engaging in moderate- and high-risk PA starting after first week of treatment initiation

Hermans et al. (2022) [59]Multicentre, single-arm, open-label, Phase III HAVEN 6 trial in PwHA (mild or moderate) aged 2–71 years followed for median of 55.6 weeks N=73
  • Baseline PA levels were comparable to the general population and remained stable through Week 49

Astermark et al. (2025) [57]Interventional, multicentre, single-arm, open-label HemiNorth 2 trial in PwHA (severe) aged 12–60 years followed for a mean of 51.1 weeks N=28
  • PA parameters remained stable after switching from FVIII prophylaxis (Week 24) to end of study (Week 49) including time spent in PA, daily step counts, and METs

  • The proportion of patients with zero PA-related bleeds increased from 39.3% with FVIII prophylaxis to 75.0% with emicizumab

Warren et al. (2020) [66]
  • Single-centre, retrospective chart review in PwHA (mild to severe) aged 0–80 years initiating emicizumab

  • N=68

  • 55% of participants reported an increase in PA levels, 45% similar rates

  • 25% reported trying new types of PA ranging from walking more to lifting weights or playing dodge ball

Nogami et al. (2024) [61]
  • Interim analysis of the multicentre, prospective, observational study, TSUBASA, in PwHA (moderate or severe) aged 0–73 years

  • N=107

  • 396 PA sessions reported, most commonly walking (32.4%), cycling (14.9%), and soccer (5.4%)

  • Two PA-related bleeds (0.5%) reported in one participant secondary to running and weight training

Concizumab
Villarreal et al. (2022) [88]
  • Exploratory analysis of the multicentre, randomised, open-label, Phase III explorer7 trial in PwHA/B with inhibitors (any severity) aged ≥12 years

  • N=52

  • Changes in percentage of awake time spent in moderate and moderate-to-vigorous PA from baseline to end of main part of trial favoured concizumab (estimated difference versus no prophylaxis: 4.2% for moderate PA, 4.4% for moderate-to-vigorous PA)

  • One patient (7.7%) in the concizumab group participated in each of low-to-moderate, moderate, and moderate-to-high-risk sports at end of main part of trial; one patient (9.1%) in the no prophylaxis group participated in low-to-moderate-risk sports (none in moderate or moderate-to-high-risk sports)

Jiménez-Yuste et al. 2024 [89]Exploratory analysis of the multicentre, randomised, open-label, Phase III explorer7 (PwHA/B with inhibitors [any severity] aged ≥12 years) and explorer8 (PwHA/B without inhibitors [severe] aged ≥12 years) trials N=68 (27 from explorer7, 41 from explorer8)
  • Changes in percentage of awake time spent in moderate and moderate-to-vigorous PA from baseline to end of main part of trial favoured concizumab (estimated difference versus no prophylaxis: 4.2% for moderate PA, 4.4% for moderate-to-vigorous PA) for PwH/A with inhibitors, but there was no significant difference for patients without inhibitors (estimated difference versus no prophylaxis: 1.3% for moderate PA, 0.8% for moderate-to-vigorous PA)

Fidanacogene elaparvovec
von Mackenson et al. (2023) [95]Descriptive long-term follow-up analysis of the open-label, non-randomised, dose-escalation study of fidanacogene elaparvovec in PwHB (moderate-to-severe) N=14
  • Between Weeks 52 and 156, 86–100% of patients reported doing the same or higher-intensity PA than at baseline

  • At Week 156, no patients reported a reduction in PA amount or intensity relative to baseline

Language: English
Page range: 173 - 191
Published on: Dec 12, 2025
Published by: Haemnet Ltd
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Kelsey Uminski, Julia Brooks, Sheri van Gunst, Moise Aristide, Greig Blamey, published by Haemnet Ltd
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.