Development of decision-making considerations to support equitable patient selection in paediatric haemophilia trials

Fu, Anne; Strike, Karen; Hamilton, Korinne; Waterhouse, Linda; Decker, Kay; Almonte, Theresa; Chan, Anthony K C

doi:10.2478/jhp-2022-0007

References

Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, et al. Treatment Guidelines Working Group on behalf of the World Federation of Hemophilia. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia 2013; 19(1): 1–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02909.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sulser E. A patient's perspective on hemophilia. Semin Hematol 2006; 43(2 Suppl 3): S13–6. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.02.005.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jansen MO, Angelos P, Schrantz SJ, Donington JS, Madariaga MLL, Zakrison TL. Fair and equitable subject selection in concurrent COVID-19 clinical trials. J Med Ethics 2021; 47(1): 7–11. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106590.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th edn. 2001. New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Unger JM, Cook E, Tai E, Bleyer A. The role of clinical trial participation in cancer research: barriers, evidence, and strategies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016; 35: 185–198. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_156686.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dobra R, Scott S, Davies JC, Simmonds NJ. Who and why; sharing our experiences of developing a standard operating procedure (SOP) to allocate screening slots for highly competitive cystic fibrosis trials. J Cyst Fibros 2019; 18(5): e45–e46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.04.008.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weijer C. Selecting subjects for participation in clinical research: one sphere of justice. J Med Ethics 1999; 25(1): 31–36. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.1.31.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacKay D, Saylor KW. Four faces of fair subject selection. Am J Bioeth 2020; 20(2): 5–19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1701731.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000; 283(20): 2701–2711. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Strassle C. Fair subject selection in cystic fibrosis trials. J Cyst Fibros 2019; 18(5): e47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.05.019.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacKay D. Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity. J Med Ethics 2016; 42(10): 672–677. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103311.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gupta R, Morain SR. Ethical allocation of future COVID-19 vaccines. J Med Ethics 2020 Dec 17:medethics-2020-106850. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106850. Epub ahead of print.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Henn W. Allocation criteria for an initial shortage of a future SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and necessary measures for global immunity. Vaccine 2020;38(34):5396–5397. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.058.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rawlings A, Brandt L, Ferreres A, et al. Ethical considerations for allocation of scarce resources and alterations in surgical care during a pandemic. Surg Endosc 2021; 35(5): 2217–2222. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07629-x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guidolin K, Catton J, Rubin B, et al. Ethical decision making during a healthcare crisis: a resource allocation framework and tool. J Med Ethics 2021; medethics-2021-107255. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107255.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.TCPS 2. December 2018. Ottawa, ON: Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research. Available from https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2018.html (accessed 27 July 2021).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wells JR, Gater A, Marshall C, Tritton T, Vashi P, Kessabi S. Exploring the impact of infusion frequency in hemophilia A: exit interviews with patients participating in BAY 94-9027 extension studies (PROTECT VIII). Patient 2019; 12(6): 611–619. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00374-x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Iorio A, Marchesini E, Marcucci M, et al. Clotting factor concentrates given to prevent bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with hemophilia A or B. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (9): CD003429. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003429.pub4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Konkle BA, Skinner M, Iorio A. Hemophilia trials in the twenty-first century: Defining patient important outcomes. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2019; 3(2): 184–192. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12195.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhou ZY, Riske B, Forsberg AD, et al. Self-reported barriers to hemophilia care in people with factor VIII deficiency. Am J Prev Med 2011; 41(6 Suppl 4): S346–S353. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.09.003.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saxena K. Barriers and perceived limitations to early treatment of hemophilia. J Blood Med 2013 May 16; 4: 49–56. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S43734.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soares BMD, Simeoni LA, de Almeida KJQ, et al. Factors associated with compliance with the treatment protocol and mortality in adults with hemophilia. Patient Prefer Adherence 2020; 14: 2279–2285. doi:10.2147/PPA.S279401.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bodicoat DH, Routen AC, Willis A, et al. Promoting inclusion in clinical trials-a rapid review of the literature and recommendations for action. Trials 2021;22(1):880. doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05849-7.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Development of decision-making considerations to support equitable patient selection in paediatric haemophilia trials

References

Paradigm

My account