References
- Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), pp. pp. 17-32. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.17
- Bonner, S. E. (1990). Experience effects in auditing: The role of task-specific knowledge. The Accounting Review, 65(1), pp. 72–92.
- Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, R. H., & McGrath, N. T. (1992). Audit quality attributes: The perceptions of audit partners, preparers, and financial statement users. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 11(1), pp. 1–15.
- Choi, J.-H., Kim, C., Kim, J.-B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), pp. 73–97. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.73
- DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), pp. 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
- DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), pp. 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
- Deis, D. R., & Giroux, G. A. (1992). Determinants of audit quality in the public sector. The Accounting Review, 67(3), pp. 462–479.
- Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2023). International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation (FATF recommendations). https://www.fatf-gafi.org
- Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), pp. 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.003
- Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), pp. 125–152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006
- Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), pp. 1521–1552. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
- International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2021). International Standard on Quality Management (ISQM) 1: Quality management for firms that perform audits or reviews of financial statements, or other assurance or related services engagements. IFAC. https://www.iaasb.org
- International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2021). International Standard on Quality Management (ISQM) 2: Engagement quality reviews. IFAC. https://www.iaasb.org
- International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA). (2020). International code of ethics for professional accountants (including international independence standards). IFAC. https://www.ethicsboard.org
- International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2019a). International Education Standard (IES) 5: Initial professional development – Practical experience. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org
- International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2019b). International Education Standard (IES) 7: Continuing professional development. IFAC. https://www.ifac.org
- Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, M. (2015). Does the Identity of Engagement Partners Matter? An Analysis of Audit Partner Reporting Decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), pp. 1443–1478. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12113
- Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), pp. 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-D