Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Experimental load test statistics for the selected IPS tools on low-performance IoT devices Cover

Experimental load test statistics for the selected IPS tools on low-performance IoT devices

Journal of Electrical Engineering
Volume 70 (2019): Issue 4 (August 2019)
By: Tomas Zitta,  Michal Lucki,  Lukas Vojtech,  Marek Neruda and  Lenka Mejzrova  
Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. [1] M. Yassein, Q. Abuein, and S. Alasal, “Combining software-defined networking with Internet of Things: Survey on security performance aspects”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS) Monastir, Tunisia, 8-10 May 2017.10.1109/ICEMIS.2017.8273027
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] A. Lupia and F. De Rango, “Performance evaluation of secure AODV with trust management under an energy aware perspective”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer Telecommunication Systems Monterey, CA, USA, 6-10, 2014.10.1109/SPECTS.2014.6879999
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] C. Y. Tseung, K. P. Chow, and X. Zhang, “Anti-DDoS technique using self-learning bloom filter”, Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence Security Informatics (ISI), Beijing China, 2017.10.1109/ISI.2017.8004917
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] B. Mukherjee, R. L. Neupane, and P. Calyam, “End-to-End IoT Security Middleware for Cloud-Fog Communication”, Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cyber Security Cloud Computing (CSCloud), New York USA, 2017.10.1109/CSCloud.2017.62
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] G. Kalnoor and J. Agarkhed, “Pattern Matching Intrusion Detection Technique for Wireless Sensor Networks”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Electrical Electronics, Information, Communication Bio-Informatics (AEEICB16), Chennai, India, 2016.10.1109/AEEICB.2016.7538389
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] G. Kalnoor and J. Agarkhed, Snort - Network Intrusion Detection & Prevention System, Available online: https://www.snort.org (accessed on 1st August 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] P. Singh, S. Behal, and K. Kumar, “Performance Enhancement of a Malware Detection System using Score Based Prioritization of Snort Rules”, Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Green Computing Internet of Things (ICGCIoT), Noida India, 2016.10.1109/ICGCIoT.2015.7380636
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] A. Sagala, “Automatic Snort IDS Rule Generation Based on Honeypot Log”, Proceedings of the 2015 7th International Conference on Information Technology Electrical Engineering (ICITEE), Chiang Mai Thailand, 2015.10.1109/ICITEED.2015.7409013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] A. Garg and P. Maheshwari, “Performance Analysis of Snort-based Intrusion Detection System”, Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computing Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore India, 2016.10.1109/ICACCS.2016.7586351
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] N. Naik, R. Diao, and Q. Shen, “Application of Dynamic Fuzzy Rule Interpolation for Intrusion Detection: D-FRI-Snort”, Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Vancouver BC, Canada, 2016.10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2016.7737671
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] E. Albin and N. Rowe, “A Realistic Experimental Comparison of the Suricata Snort Intrusion-Detection Systems”, Proceedings of the 2012 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking Applications Workshops, Fukuoka Japan, 2012.10.1109/WAINA.2012.29
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] J. White, T. Fitzsimmons, and J. Matthews, “Quantitative analysis of intrusion detection systems: Snort Suricata”, SPIE Defense Security Sensing Cyber Security Conference, vol. 8757 Baltimore, USA, 2013.10.1117/12.2015616
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] M. Ennert, E. Chovancova, and Z. Dudlakova, “Testing of IDS model using several intrusion detection tools”, Journal of Applied Mathematics Computational Mechanics, vol. 14 no. 1, pp. 55-62, 2013.10.17512/jamcm.2015.1.05
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] K. Thongkanchorn, S. Ngamsuriyaroj, and V. Visoottiviseth, “Evaluation Studies of Three Intrusion Detection Systems under Various Attacks Rule Sets”, Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference of IEEE Region 10 (TENCON 2013), Xi’an China, 22-25, 2013.10.1109/TENCON.2013.6718975
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] S. Sremath, H. Sathu, and A. Sarrafzadeh, “Free open source intrusion detection systems: a study”, Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Machine Learning Cybernetics (ICMLC), Guangzhou China, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] D. Bhosale and V. Mane, “Comparative Study Analysis of Network Intrusion Detection Tools”, Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Applied Theoretical Computing Communication Technology (iCATccT), Davangere India, 2015.10.1109/ICATCCT.2015.7456901
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] B. Brumen and J. Legvart, “Performance analysis of two open source intrusion detection systems”, Proceedings of the 2016 39th International Convention on Information Communication Technology Electronics Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 2016.10.1109/MIPRO.2016.7522356
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] L. Tuong and K. Kimura, “2-Step Power Scheduling with Adaptive Control Interval for Network Intrusion Detection Systems on Multicores”, Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSOC), Lyon France, 21-23, 2016.10.1109/MCSoC.2016.18
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] P. S. Horn, “Some Easy t Statistics.”, J, of the Americ. Statist. Assoc. 78, 930-936, 1983.10.1080/01621459.1983.10477042
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] https://github.com/esnet/iperf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jee-2019-0058 | Journal eISSN: 1339-309X | Journal ISSN: 1335-3632
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 285 - 294
Submitted on: Jul 13, 2019
|
Published on: Oct 21, 2019
Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year
Keywords:
security,
intrusion prevention systems,
load analysis,
low-power devices,
IoT,
horn method
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2019 Tomas Zitta, Michal Lucki, Lukas Vojtech, Marek Neruda, Lenka Mejzrova, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 70 (2019): Issue 4 (August 2019)Next article