Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Nanoparticle shapes: Quantification by elongation, convexity and circularity measures Cover

Nanoparticle shapes: Quantification by elongation, convexity and circularity measures

Journal of Electrical Engineering
Volume 70 (2019): Issue 7 (December 2019)
By: Lazar Kopanja,  Boris Lončar,  Dragiša Žunić and  Marin Tadić  
Open Access
|Sep 2019

References

  1. [1] G. Tong, Y. Liu, T. Wu, C. Tong, and F. Du, ““ H2O-steered size/phase evolution and magnetic properties of large-scale, monodisperse FexOy nanomaterials”, Journal of Materials Chemistry C, vol. 3, pp. 5506–5515, 2015.10.1039/C5TC00347D
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] B. Ahmed, S. Kumar, S. Kumar and A. K. Ojha, “Shape induced (spherical, sheets and rods) optical and magnetic properties of CdS nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic activity for photodegradation of methylene blue dye under ultra-violet irradiation”, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 679, pp. 324–334, 2016.10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.295
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] S. P. Gubin, Y. A. Koksharov, G. B. Khomutov and G. Y. E. Yurkov, “Magnetic nanoparticles: preparation, structure and properties”, Russian Chemical Reviews, vol. 74, pp. 489–520, 2005.10.1070/RC2005v074n06ABEH000897
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] R. M. Fratila, S. Rivera-Fernández and M. Jesús, “Shape matters: synthesis and biomedical applications of high aspect ratio magnetic nanomaterials”, Nanoscale, vol. 7, pp.8233–8260, 2015.10.1039/C5NR01100K
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] H. Gavilán, O. Posth, L. K. Bogart, U. Steinhoff, L. Gutiérrez and M. P. Morales, “How shape and internal structure affect the magnetic properties of anisometric magnetite nanoparticles”, Acta Materialia, vol. 125, pp. 416–424, 2017.10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] A. H. Lu, E. E. Salabas and F. Schüth, “Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application”, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 46, pp. 1222–1244, 2007.10.1002/anie.200602866
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] A. Nagata, H. Sato, Y. Matsui, T. Kaneko and Y. Fujiwara, “Magnetic properties of carbon nanotubes filled with ferromagnetic metals”, Vacuum, vol. 87, pp. 182–186, 2013.10.1016/j.vacuum.2012.03.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] L. Kopanja, D. Žunić, B. Lončar, S. Gyergyek and M. Tadić, “Quantifying shapes of nanoparticles using modified circularity and ellipticity measures”, Measurement, vol. 92, pp. 252–263, 2016.10.1016/j.measurement.2016.06.021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] M. Mohammadikish, “Hydrothermal synthesis, characterization and optical properties of ellipsoid shape α-Fe2O3 nanocrystals”, Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 1351–1358, 2014.10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.07.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] L. Kopanja, M. Tadić, S. Kralj and J. Žunić, “Shape and aspect ratio analysis of anisotropic magnetic nanochains based on TEM micrographs”, Ceramics International, vol. 44, pp. 12340–12351, 2018.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] T. O. Paine, L. I. Mendelsohn and F. E. Luborsky, “Effect of shape anisotropy on the coercive force of elongated single-magnetic-domain iron particles”, Physical Review, vol. 100, pp. 1055, 1995.10.1103/PhysRev.100.1055
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Z. Wang, “A new approach for segmentation and quantification of cells or nanoparticles”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 12(3), pp. 962–971, 2016.10.1109/TII.2016.2542043
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Y. C. Chen, Y. C. Chen, Y. C. and A. S. Chiang, “Template-driven segmentation of confocal microscopy images”, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, vol. 89(3), pp. 239–247, 2008.10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.11.00718178286
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] L. Li and Q. An, “An in-depth study of tool wear monitoring technique based on image segmentation and texture analysis”, Measurement, vol. 79, pp. 44–52, 2016.10.1016/j.measurement.2015.10.029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] M. A. Akta and J. Žunić, “Measuring shape ellipticity”, Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 170–177, 2011.10.1007/978-3-642-23672-3_21
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] A. Boschetto and V. Giordano, “Powder sampling and characterization by digital image analysis”, Measurement, vol. 45, pp. 1023–1038, 2012.10.1016/j.measurement.2012.01.041
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] E. S. Gadelmawla, “Simple and efficient algorithms for roundness evaluation from the coordinate measurement data”, Measurement, vol. 43, pp. 223–235, 2010.10.1016/j.measurement.2009.10.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] A. M. Herrera-Navarro, H. Jiménez-Hernández and I. R. Terol-Villalobos, “Framework for characterizing circularity based on a probability distribution”, Measurement, vol. 46, pp. 4232–4243, 2013.10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] M. Ilić, I. Budak, M. V. Vasić, A. Nagode, U. Kozmidis-Luburić, J. Hodolič and T. Puškar, “Size and shape particle analysis by applying image analysis and laser diffraction-Inhalable dust in a dental laboratory”, Measurement, vol. 66, pp. 109–117, 2015.10.1016/j.measurement.2015.01.028
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] R. Klette and J. Žunić, “Digital approximation of moments of convex regions”, Graphical Models and Image Processing, vol. 61, pp. 274–298, 1999.10.1006/gmip.1999.0501
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] P. L. Rosin, “Measuring shape: ellipticity, rectangularity, and triangularity”, Machine Vision and Applications, vol. 14, pp. 172–184, 2003.10.1007/s00138-002-0118-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] P. L. Rosin and J. Žunić, “Measuring squareness and orientation of shapes”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 39, pp. 13–27, 2011.10.1007/s10851-010-0221-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] A. B. Sekuler, “Axis of elongation can determine reference frames for object perception”, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 50, pp. 270, 1996.10.1037/1196-1961.50.3.270
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] M. A. Taylor, “Quantitative measures for shape and size of particles”, Powder Technology, vol. 124, pp. 94–100, 2002.10.1016/S0032-5910(01)00476-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] J. Zunic, P. L. Rosin and L. Kopanja, “On the orientability of shapes”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 15, pp. 3478–3487, 2006.10.1109/TIP.2006.877527
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] J. Žunić, L. Kopanja and J. E. Fieldsend, “Notes on shape orientation where the standard method does not work”, Pattern Recognition, vol. 39, pp. 856–865, 2006.10.1016/j.patcog.2005.11.010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] J. Žunić, R. Kakarala and M. A. Aktas, “Notes on shape based tools for treating the objects ellipticity issues”, Pattern Recognition, vol. 69, pp. 141–149, 2017.10.1016/j.patcog.2017.04.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] J. Zunic and P. L. Rosin, “A new convexity measure for polygons”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 26, pp. 923–934, 2004.10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1918579950
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] R. Mukundan and K. R. Ramakrishnan, Moment functions in image analysis-theory and applications, World Scientific, 1998.10.1142/3838
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] M. Stojmenović and J. Žunić, “Measuring elongation from shape boundary”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 30, pp. 73–85, 2008.10.1007/s10851-007-0039-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] J. Žunić, K. Hirota and P. L. Rosin, “A Hu moment invariant as a shape circularity measure”, Pattern Recognition, vol. 43, pp. 47–57, 2010.10.1016/j.patcog.2009.06.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jee-2019-0040 | Journal eISSN: 1339-309X | Journal ISSN: 1335-3632
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 44 - 50
Submitted on: Mar 19, 2019
|
Published on: Sep 28, 2019
Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year
Keywords:
shape analysis,
nanoparticles,
elongation,
shape descriptors,
circularity,
convexity
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2019 Lazar Kopanja, Boris Lončar, Dragiša Žunić, Marin Tadić, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 70 (2019): Issue 7 (December 2019)Next article